Murder on Zidanes Floor
You'd better not kill Giroud
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2015
- Messages
- 30,478
At this rate a bucket with a face on it would be fine
I've have been a fan since last season but you're right he never seems to be linked with any jobs outside Italy. I've seen a few inter fans actually allude to the fact that last season he wasn't even actually playing his preferred tactics but had to adjust due to the players he had available. If true that's actually incredible given that they did well last season too.I mentioned him a while ago. I’ve never actually seen him linked with any big jobs though. Maybe he’s to settled there. It’s unsure whether we’d go for a manager that prefers a 3 at the back formations.
He is tactically flexible and the way he setup his midfield is very good. He has managed to get Mkhi and Sanchez playing at a very high level again and his conversion of Hakan from a no10 to a deep playmaker has been a stroke of genius.Did anybody see his tactics against Atletico? In possession he swapped his CBs and CMs to help quick ball progression from the back and the CBs became CMs to battle the Atletico CM 3. Certainly not adverse to trying new things. They won the game too, and have only lost once in the league all season.
I think ETH's biggest problem is the same undoing LVG had. Stubbornly sticking to a tactic that doesn't bring results and failing to adapt accordingly to the league. LVG went to conservative and structural, stripping the team of any sort of imagination essentially making us blunt and boring. ETH is going the complete opposite direction and is failing to implement any sort of structure.It’s a hard one. I have no idea why Hag didn’t work. We simply haven’t seen what he churned out at Ajax, which was beautiful football. He’s admitted we will never see that. I don’t understand why.
He was my first choice by a landslide when we were replacing Ole. Our next manager simply needs to get us playing lovely stuff and scoring goals. Who can do this for us? Naggelsmann looks to have the personality, which may be important.
You right Still funnyThat’s Filipio right? Not Simone
So long as the players are good, the manager should be fine.I think Ineos will make the change and look for someone homegrown and young. Who understands British football and works in a system. Particularly someone who understands United. I wouldn't be surprised to see Kieran McKenna taken on as a coach who will implement the Ineos preferred method of playing. They're implementing a structure now that is compartmentalised and designed to let a coach be just that and will be looking for the right character rather than a big name baggage manager.
You need someone who is a good fit with whatever DoF and recruitment team gets appointed. I'd say that your next managers ability to work alongside his bosses is incredibly important.I fear we will end up Potter.
I agree. Gonna be hard for any manager to come here and do that though when we’ve still got Rashford who decides when he plays good and when he plays bad. A lot of players only play good until there offered a massive contract. I read up that Ratcliffe wants to introduce a reward wage bonus thing, that’s what city have. That should help in maintaining players play to an high standard every week and not just until they get a contract.It’s a hard one. I have no idea why Hag didn’t work. We simply haven’t seen what he churned out at Ajax, which was beautiful football. He’s admitted we will never see that. I don’t understand why.
He was my first choice by a landslide when we were replacing Ole. Our next manager simply needs to get us playing lovely stuff and scoring goals. Who can do this for us? Nagelsman looks to have the personality, which may be important.
I keep hearing this Ajax mantra. Just maybe because Ajax played in one of the weakest leagues in Europe, and have the resources almost equal to rest of league combined, they could play good football? They had one good run in Europe, but also had a collection of very good players. We also see occasionally a team have a great run and look better than they really are in Europe, when other teams underperform. Perhaps coming from an easier league helps. We need a manager who has shown something in a tough league.It’s a hard one. I have no idea why Hag didn’t work. We simply haven’t seen what he churned out at Ajax, which was beautiful football. He’s admitted we will never see that. I don’t understand why.
He was my first choice by a landslide when we were replacing Ole. Our next manager simply needs to get us playing lovely stuff and scoring goals. Who can do this for us? Nagelsman looks to have the personality, which may be important.
But other small clubs in our own league play good football. The type of football comes from coaching and the right system players. Yes there’s a reason these teams like Brighton aren’t competing for top trophies, that’s where the resources come from. But the style comes from the coach.I keep hearing this Ajax mantra. Just maybe because Ajax played in one of the weakest leagues in Europe, and have the resources almost equal to rest of league combined, they could play good football? They had one good run in Europe, but also had a collection of very good players. We also see occasionally a team have a great run and look better than they really are in Europe, when other teams underperform. Perhaps coming from an easier league helps. We need a manager who has shown something in a tough league.
I can't see how he turns this around. My worry is that we'll replace EtH and in 12 months we'll still be in the same position.
This is the point that I was trying to make last night. There is no point right now throwing around different names with different philosophiesNot really sure why I keep seeing people say we can’t have ……. because he plays this way or we can’t have …… because he plays this formation when Ratcliffe made it very clear in his interview that an incoming Director Of Football (Ashworth) and the footballing structure will be deciding how United play and our on pitch identity/set up.
Whoever we bring in will be told how we play and our philosophy so they will have to adapt their own style if they were to be successful in their application, the days of us bringing in manager after manager and the club bringing players in to suit their style whilst being stuck with players from managers before them too are over..
We currently have players in the squad from as far back as LVG’s reigns with players who played under Jose, Ole, Rangnick and lots of ETH’s own signings thrown in and that’s on the piss poor footballing structure that’s been in place, or more so lack of footballing structure, so it’ll be no more bringing in managers with different tactics or formations to the previous one and more so everyone on the same page going forward whoever takes over from ETH and yes ETH must go.
Alonso is the most upcoming. When I said best I’d be thinking Klopp, Pep, Carlo, but I think I meant best available. I’d say best available would be Zidane and Alonso. Yes you are correct they are both a gamble.
In some points I have to defend Tuchel a bit. Yes, he did't win the BL, but he performed on par with Klopp's title winning seasons with them. His problem was, that he had to face the fully assembled superteam managed by Guardiola while Klopp had to face only the Bayern team building and developing towards that (remember, Klopp set the point record in 2012, Heynckes crushed that in 2013 and won the treble). So with this context I really don't think Tuchel did (much) worse than Klopp at Dortmund. Klopp obviously has the title wins, the CL final in his favour, but his team wasn't miles ahead of Tuchel's team there.The thing with Tuchel for me was he never won the Bundesliga with Dortmund which would be a real achievement.
Didn't win the Champions League with a stacked PSG team.
Has done poorly with Bayern despite winning the Bundesliga last season. With a good squad, even if they don't have one of their best ever squads. They still have a defence which could contain Kimmich, Pavard, the right back they signed from Ajax whose name evades me... Kim min jae, Upamecano and Alphonso Davies.
He chose to let Pavard go. Harry Kane couldn't even mask their issues this season.
His big success was with Chelsea winning the Champions League coming I believe mid season that year.
I'm definitely not sold on either Tuchel or Nagelsmann. It's hard to believe in someone that couldn't succeed at Bayern in Germany.
I think once the football is right and the players are fitting the system the personality aspect will take care of itself. Think we've been in thrall to that cult of manager for too long. If the team are sweeping all before them and playing swashbuckling football the United fans will laud and love McKenna into a personality. More important is recruiting the right players who dont think they are above him I feelThis is what crossed my mind of recent. Pep, Zidane, Arteta, Alonso were never proven when they took over their first roles and look at them now. It high time we look for fresh ideas and I believe Kieran McKenna has potentieal. my only worry is his charisma. I doubt he is a big personality enough to handle the pressure that comes with managing Man United else he is a good upcoming coach.
agreed.So long as the players are good, the manager should be fine.
In some points I have to defend Tuchel a bit. Yes, he did't win the BL, but he performed on par with Klopp's title winning seasons with them. His problem was, that he had to face the fully assembled superteam managed by Guardiola while Klopp had to face only the Bayern team building and developing towards that (remember, Klopp set the point record in 2012, Heynckes crushed that in 2013 and won the treble). So with this context I really don't think Tuchel did (much) worse than Klopp at Dortmund. Klopp obviously has the title wins, the CL final in his favour, but his team wasn't miles ahead of Tuchel's team there.
Didn't win the CL, but still managed PSG's best CL season.
Bayern don't have a great squad and they messed up their transfer business. Tuchel was ok with selling Pavard and loaning out Stanisic provided that proper replacements were signed. Bayern's board fecked up three transfers on summer deadline day and got him Eric Dier in the winter. Considering how thin their squad at the back was (against Tuchel's explicit wishes) it is no wonder that they often do look vulnerable. Bayern currently is playing the second best league season since Guardiola left. That's absolutely not doing poorly, but it is a clear increase over Nagelsmann.
However, and in this regard I am with you: It's probably not good enough to convince you, even with that context provided. And that's absolutely fair.
If we make a change my order of preference is:
1. Amorim
2. Nagelsmann
3. Tuchel
4. Potter
How's Amorim a clown out of interest?I‘d keep Eric instead of handing one of those clowns a 3yr contract just to sack them after a year
I‘d keep Eric instead of handing one of those clowns a 3yr contract just to sack them after a year
Those bottom three can eff off.If we make a change my order of preference is:
1. Amorim
2. Nagelsmann
3. Tuchel
4. Potter
This is only partially true. Yes, they did sign players from Dortmund, and they often did that before to other teams who won the league. But around 2010 there was an important shift in Bayern's recruitment. Essentially they finally started to really act as global players. The key to their treble 2013 wasn't Dortmund players (remember, Götze and Lewandowski only arrived after that season), but that they had signed players like Ribery, Robben, Martinez that finally elevated them above the around 75 points usual BL winners got to around 85 points which nobody could beat not even with a great run of form.Until Bayern did what they do and sign their rivals players to kill them off.
He also went on a dreadful run of three wins in 16 PL matches earlier this season. However, this never got highlighted in the media, as he is the latest "flavour of the month".I'd be curious to see how De Zerbi does with a much bigger club.
And he won't need to have too much input on incoming players once we hire the right people for the board.
It's a gamble though, but he's shown a far greater ability than ETH in the league in terms of maximizing a team. With better players, his system and way of playing could yield great results.
His Brighton team were 4th in xPts last season and are 6th thus far.
With the departures over the summer it’s not that surprising that there was a dip in their form initially.He also went on a dreadful run of three wins in 16 PL matches earlier this season. However, this never got highlighted in the media, as he is the latest "flavour of the month".
Me too. I think the club is doomed whoever we put in charge, it goes beyond who’s sat in the dugout.I can't see how he turns this around. My worry is that we'll replace EtH and in 12 months we'll still be in the same position.
Isn't Nagelsmann a specialist at man management?Those bottom three can eff off.
Tuchel is awful, will probably have to go back into rehab.
Nagelsmann is a child and apparently is very bad at man management.
Potter was held up by a great structure at Brighton.
De Zerbi or Nagelsmann.
Also lost 4-0 to Luton…He also went on a dreadful run of three wins in 16 PL matches earlier this season. However, this never got highlighted in the media, as he is the latest "flavour of the month".
I have thought about this as well and the fact Barrada will be the main man we will probably implement a similar style to city, maybe arsenal which is similar without being exact. So imo a 433 will probably be the default tactic. Nagelsmann as manager?
They played good football under Potter too. It's more of a testament of how well run the club is.If its a similar style to City than Nagelsman isn't your guy. There were reports that higher ups are City like De Zerbi and I can see it happening, and in the right environment working. Brighton play good football and its outside of City the most attractive brand of football. They always lose their best players and have had crazy injuries this season, but they still play well. Definitely a project I can get behind.
The guy has been doing such a great job for years, both at Lazio and Inter and yet he hasn't been talked about enough. The football his team plays is impressive, too.
He would not.If he’s available Nagelsmann makes a lot of sense, I don’t know if he would want to leave the German national team before the Euros in the summer, unless we got him immediately after.
A bit of a stretch, but with Nagelsmann maybe, just maybe, he'd be up for starting his role now. Wouldn't be the first time a national team coach managed a club at the same time.
He would get crucified in Germany. It’s a European Championship and Germany is the host and record champion of the competition. No way the German federation would ever allow it. He’s not coaching Iceland…
For all those saying Tuchel… I think he would be a horrible, horrible choice. The guy would pick a fight with Ghandi and Mother Theresa. He’s a smart man and a great tactician but is emotional intelligence is next to zero. On paper he makes sense with his accolades and PL experience, but I think it would go terribly wrong. It would be like reappointing Mourinho.
Another important note, he already has managed Onana and had him playing at his best. So much so we bought him for a huge transfer fee. But imagine Martinez being utilised in his system, it would be effective.
Another important note, he already has managed Onana and had him playing at his best. So much so we bought him for a huge transfer fee. But imagine Martinez being utilised in his system, it would be effective.