Which of your toys will you throw out the pram if Sancho, Antony and Rashford return to United?

LDUred said:
At least with Antony you can't question his attitude. He's always worked hard.

He's a talented player who is just not cut out for the physicality of the EPL.
Click to expand...
Yeah I find it hard to dislike somewhat basic players that are willing to put in a shift for the club like Antony, Fred, Mctominay, even Mount.

Things outside their control (transfer fees, injuries) frustrate us but you can't question their commitment.
 
There is a stark difference between an expensive flop and a toxic player who downed tools. Anthony should not be put in the same category as the other two. Having said that, if we are going to start being a serious club challenging for honours then all three should not be anywhere near the club come next season.
 
Brand Nubian said:
Let them cook on the tour against poor MLS opposition so the biding war between those rich US clubs can commence.
Rashford to NY (50million dollars), Sancho to Miami feeding Messi (40million dollars).
But it could be the other way around as Rashord is the second favourite (after Martial) player for Joel Glazer so he´d love to see him in the flesh every other week. Although I believe Rashy would love to live in New York and become a regullar celebrity at the Knicks games.
Antony will be the most difficult to sell to any rich MLS club as he doesnt have as big of a name in world football as those two.
Click to expand...

Cant we sell Rashford to the Knicks?
 
:) (Un)fortunately Dolan is not running sporting operations there anymore, you might be able to fool him otherwise. With his height and athleticism Rashy must be dunking them in for fun.
 
I’m often just so confused with the likes of Rashford and Sancho. Why is it so hard for them to just run around a lot for 90 minutes, every 3 or sometimes every 7 days, while getting paid that much.

They’re still young, super fit and healthy.
 
Agree with most here - I don't have a problem with Antony. I can forgive Rashford if he came back with a good attitude (because of hist history) - but Sancho ? Never
 
Now that we know Sancho will definitely be back I plan to throw a right fecking wobbler.
 
T00lsh3d said:
Now that we know Sancho will definitely be back I plan to throw a right fecking wobbler.
Click to expand...
Sancho is done, no top club will come from him. Hopefully some of the teams for less physical league will buy him looking at how well Antony is doing.
 
They are all going to return from their loan spells, with Orstein confirming the penalty fee for Chelsea is only 5m to send Sancho back that is a no brainer and Villa won’t activate the 40m fee for Rashford.

Sancho returning is really annoying as seemed like he was gone but one way or another all three will get until they are loaned/sold so their careers at Utd are effectively over.
 
Moston Red said:
I actually think Shaw being injured had a big impact on Rashfords form.
Click to expand...

This might be true, but on the flip side, how can he be paid so much when his performane can be affected so drastically by something as simple as us missing one player?
 
Roboc7 said:
They are all going to return from their loan spells, with Orstein confirming the penalty fee for Chelsea is only 5m to send Sancho back that is a no brainer and Villa won’t activate the 40m fee for Rashford.

Sancho returning is really annoying as seemed like he was gone but one way or another all three will get until they are loaned/sold so their careers at Utd are effectively over.
Click to expand...

5m only? Why would we agree to that? It doesn't make sense with the "obligation to buy".
 
Nothing, really. Their United career’s are all finished. They’ll be another clubs problem next season.
 
Nick7 said:
Nothing, really. Their United career’s are all finished. They’ll be another clubs problem next season.
Click to expand...
This I wish them all well as I would Dalot (still dont have a lot of joy for him) ! Rashford certainly had the talent but not the attitude
 
I just can’t understand how an obligation to buy for £25 million if Chelsea finish above 14th has a penalty clause of just £5 million if Chelsea pull out, surely our board can’t be that stupid ? Right ? Right ? If so someone needs to lose their job as that’s possibly the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever known transfer wise.
 
davidmichael said:
I just can’t understand how an obligation to buy for £25 million if Chelsea finish above 14th has a penalty clause of just £5 million if Chelsea pull out, surely our board can’t be that stupid ? Right ? Right ? If so someone needs to lose their job as that’s possibly the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever known transfer wise.
Click to expand...
Ever?

A useless player with a sh!te attitude, ridiculous wages and zero clubs (bar Chelsea who probably wanted to get their squad to a round 100) interested in him… and we got most of his wages paid and at least another £5m.

The most ridiculous thing was the morons who bought him and gave him the wages.
 
davidmichael said:
I just can’t understand how an obligation to buy for £25 million if Chelsea finish above 14th has a penalty clause of just £5 million if Chelsea pull out, surely our board can’t be that stupid ? Right ? Right ? If so someone needs to lose their job as that’s possibly the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever known transfer wise.
Click to expand...
It's basically a 5m loan fee, on top of them covering his wages for the year.
 
I don't hate Antony and hope he does well wherever he ends up. I would prefer that wasn't here, but can handle him being around if we can't find a buyer. Would prefer that we don't just loan him forever until he has no value.

Would hate to see Rashford back here, and I would also hate Sancho being around again but it would be funny if Chelsea are willing to pay NOT to take Mr Freedom.
 
BeforeKeanetherewasRobson said:
Ever?

A useless player with a sh!te attitude, ridiculous wages and zero clubs (bar Chelsea who probably wanted to get their squad to a round 100) interested in him… and we got most of his wages paid and at least another £5m.

The most ridiculous thing was the morons who bought him and gave him the wages.
Click to expand...

foolsgold said:
It's basically a 5m loan fee, on top of them covering his wages for the year.
Click to expand...
The loan was for this season and obligated to turn into a permanent transfer at the end of this season as long as Chelsea finished above 14th, there shouldn’t be any possibility of Sancho coming back if the obligation is contractual which surely it is ? Surely Chelsea should be taken to court like with the Obi-Mikel thing years ago as contracts are binding.
 
Yakuza_devils said:
5m only? Why would we agree to that? It doesn't make sense with the "obligation to buy".
Click to expand...

We were desperate and not in a good negotiating position, 5m is lower than I would have expected but it’s a reflection of how difficult it was, and maybe still will be to get rid of him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.