This is a good un
I think that's the point though, saying he was useless originally is about as sensible as now claiming he's one of the world's top fullbacks.
He was a young lad that had hardly played much football when he was already written off.
I think most of us are at some point guilty of avoiding any nuance in our appraisal of players, maybe because it sounds definite and impressive to state some throwaway opinion. Most of the time players aren't hero or zero and Dalot is a perfect example. He was never that bad and he's not yet achieved anything substantial either.
How can he have been objectively poor? Doesn't even make any sense. He was subjectively poor in your opinion.No he was.
This wasn't a young talented player not quite putting his game together. He was objectively really poor.
It's great to see him performing in a position we all thought we'd struggle in.
But let's see how it goes once this initial new manager burst of excitement amongst the players dies down a bit.
Classic RedCafe. The teams form improves playing a far more conservative system under a much more organised coach, some of the feel-good factor comes back and suddenly all is forgotten and the lads who are currently starting are all amazing players. It's no wonder we bounce up and down emotionally.
Dalot has done well recently, lets be clear about that, however, he was starting from a very, very low base and it couldn't really get much worse.
I have still yet to see any evidence whatsoever that he can contribute in an attacking sense and I'm not sure yet whether his improved defensive performances are down to an upturn in his own form or just more generally the improved attitude and organisation of the team.
To be honest, I would say the same about Malacia. I love his attitude and energy and I think he has loads of raw talent. Yet there's tonnes of work to be done to get him to the level of an Andy Robertson or a Cancelo. So let's not build these players up to be something they are not and then call them names and accuse them of not trying/caring when we have a few bad results and/or when we start to try to play a bit more expansive
I think we're mostly on the same page but as you've admitted already, you're just a weary of giving praise or rating a performance, which is fine on its own. However, you are also perhaps underrating what the players have produced on the pitch and I think it's where a few take issue with. You've said Malacia was dire and referred to Dalot as being the McTominay of RBs (!) by basically playing within himself but overall in an almost net negative manner. The truth is that both fullbacks have played big parts in our build up play etc and according to ETH's instructions/tactics. They are not playing at a top tier level but imo definitely above average and hopefully on a clear progression to getting very good. In the context of where Utd is as a team, I can understand why some rate his performances as 'great' from what he's done so far. For me, Malacia/Dalot's roles and performances are more closer to Walker (defensively)/Zinchenko (play making) at City tactically than the other fullbacks mentioned.
Anyways, we're just dissecting fine details atm. It's such a short body of work as I've said before, only 4-5 games so let's see how this goes.
Football. Been plainly obvious since Rangnick gave him a chance last season. Defenders who are technically excellent with both feet and capable of playing out from the back under pressure don't grow on trees, we'd do well to tie him up to a 5 year deal and quickly before he gets huge offers from teams looking to take him on a free.
I think so too, no matter how small the last 4-6 games are at least some evidence. There are for sure those who are simply getting overhyped from the shift back to more conservative tactics but I'm backing that Dalot won't be one of them. Only just guessing by looking at general play during progressive phases. Where others have regressed to their questionable decisionmaking selves and poor general play Dalot has stayed consistent with his ball progression. His form working with ETH goes all the way back to preseason. On a lesser note Dalot was never really one of them who looked better when we played negative tactics. There isn't a body of work indicating he's reliant on it. If anything he looks better when we are organised going forward. At the very least now knows where to aim his deliveries. They've looked deadly.He definitely has the ability in terms of passing, crossing, ball carrying and general attitude when it comes to attacking/ball progression even if it is in spurts, so I'd say it's harsh to say you've not seen any evidence. Unless of course you are talking about consistency, which is fair but then that could be said about the whole team.
As for the names mentioned, I've made a post about this in response to somebody else, which may give you another perspective/expectation:
You might want to look at the videos posting there too: https://www.redcafe.net/threads/diogo-dalot-2022-23-performances.471411/page-20#post-29508960
Overall though, I agree we shouldn't jump into conclusions.
He's not poor. You wouldn't believe his collection of Rolex.I admit I thought he was poor. Delighted he’s proving me wrong!!
I hope he carries on proving me wrong because I've long said he was useless (although did note he had age on his side). But anyone saying 'I told you so' is getting carried away over his first ever solid (but not spectacular) month at this point.
Diogo Dalot has been a Manchester United player since 2018. He’s been in form since match day 3 this season. He’s playing well, but come on
Only Ole played AWB over Dalot. Ole bought AWB and played him all the time. Rangnick made Dalot first choice and put AWB in the bench. Ten Hag never plays AWB and plays Dalot all the time.How he heck did so many managers play AwB over Dalot. Was it an English bias or aWB’s transfer fee? In hindsight, Mourinho seems right. Just needed time to grow into his body and the league
How he heck did so many managers play AwB over Dalot. Was it an English bias or aWB’s transfer fee? In hindsight, Mourinho seems right. Just needed time to grow into his body and the league
How he heck did so many managers play AwB over Dalot. Was it an English bias or aWB’s transfer fee? In hindsight, Mourinho seems right. Just needed time to grow into his body and the league
Because in his first season you could count on one hand how many times opposing players could get past AWB. They tried and failed and he was very successful defensively and a big part of turning around our pathetic defensive record before him. 2nd season good too but not quite as impenetrable. 3rd and people get past him and he wasnt having as big an impact on our defensive record, which was poor
Meanwhile Dalot came in with not that much playing time and most of it at left back for Porto. He was weak defensively so he didnt play. He was sent out on loan to Milan, did well and kept a starting place and came back a better defender. We havent seen a great deal of him doing fantastic attacking for United, hopefully the Portugal performance will lead to that
He's good at passing. At least he was last yearBe honest and just admit that he just can't have even a half of these stats
Nah, some of us thought he was quite good last year considering everything, and that he could build on it this year. He always had the ability. He just needed the application and confidence.Classic RedCafe. The teams form improves playing a far more conservative system under a much more organised coach, some of the feel-good factor comes back and suddenly all is forgotten and the lads who are currently starting are all amazing players. It's no wonder we bounce up and down emotionally.
Dalot has done well recently, lets be clear about that, however, he was starting from a very, very low base and it couldn't really get much worse.
I have still yet to see any evidence whatsoever that he can contribute in an attacking sense and I'm not sure yet whether his improved defensive performances are down to an upturn in his own form or just more generally the improved attitude and organisation of the team.
To be honest, I would say the same about Malacia. I love his attitude and energy and I think he has loads of raw talent. Yet there's tonnes of work to be done to get him to the level of an Andy Robertson or a Cancelo. So let's not build these players up to be something they are not and then call them names and accuse them of not trying/caring when we have a few bad results and/or when we start to try to play a bit more expansive
He's good at passing. At least he was last year
How can he have been objectively poor? Doesn't even make any sense. He was subjectively poor in your opinion.
In my opinion he was just a young lad from a completely different footballing culture that came at a young age and had no senior experience. There wasn't even a lot to judge as he didn't get an extended run, probably because he was in fact not ready which is not a reason for big declarations.
Goes out on loan, does okay, comes back and gets a chance under Ralf, does fine without setting the world alight, and now he has really picked up.. surprise surprise after gaining a season and a half of proper experience here and in Italy.
Because in his first season you could count on one hand how many times opposing players could get past AWB. They tried and failed and he was very successful defensively and a big part of turning around our pathetic defensive record before him. 2nd season good too but not quite as impenetrable. 3rd and people get past him and he wasnt having as big an impact on our defensive record, which was poor
Meanwhile Dalot came in with not that much playing time and most of it at left back for Porto. He was weak defensively so he didnt play. He was sent out on loan to Milan, did well and kept a starting place and came back a better defender. We havent seen a great deal of him doing fantastic attacking for United, hopefully the Portugal performance will lead to that
All stats per 90 | All 21/22 | ||||
Dalot 21/22 | Dalot 22/23 | Alexander-Arnold | James | Walker | |
Pass completion | 79.8 | 71.8 | 74.4 | 86.5 | 88.9 |
Progressive passes | 4.95 | 3.9 | 8.8 | 5.8 | 4.4 |
Compl crosses box | 0.45 | 0.51 | 0.82 | 0.63 | 0.26 |
Compl passes box | 1.3 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 2.4 | 1.0 |
xA | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.06 |
SCA | 1.85 | 2.36 | 4.73 | 3.81 | 1.85 |
GCA | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.26 |
Tackles | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.2 |
Blocks | 1.85 | 1.86 | 1.23 | 1.4 | 1.03 |
Interceptions | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 1.01 | 1.28 |
Touches | 70.1 | 66.6 | 94.9 | 90.7 | 90.7 |
Dribbles (succ.) | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 0.4 |
Prog. Carries | 4.9 | 2.7 | 4.9 | 7.5 | 4.7 |
Team success +/- | + 0.39 | N/A | + 1.83 | + 0.97 | + 1.44 |
He definitely has the ability in terms of passing, crossing, ball carrying and general attitude when it comes to attacking/ball progression even if it is in spurts, so I'd say it's harsh to say you've not seen any evidence. Unless of course you are talking about consistency, which is fair but then that could be said about the whole team.
As for the names mentioned, I've made a post about this in response to somebody else, which may give you another perspective/expectation:
You might want to look at the videos posting there too: https://www.redcafe.net/threads/diogo-dalot-2022-23-performances.471411/page-20#post-29508960
Overall though, I agree we shouldn't jump into conclusions.
Forget about individual players for a minute though...I could be talking about virtually ANY player in our squad when I say 'last year was an aberration and this year they have improved'.
My point is, we tend to go through these cycles were we have a terrible season, appoint a new manager, go back to basics, sign some new players, win a few games and the feel-good factor comes back to a certain extent. At that point, certain people get carried away, talk our players up way beyond their abilities and start demanding title challenges and/or trophies.
Then invariably once the press and the fans have piled enough pressure onto the team and the manager, expectations get to a level that they struggle to hit consistently and when we try to be more progressive/expansive in order to win the volume of games needed to secure trophies, it all falls apart.
Now, let's just get back to Dalot for a second. He has played well in spells this year. He also played 90-minutes in the defeat to Brighton (and was poor), 90-minutes in the 0-4 defeat to Brentford (which thankfully I missed) and 90-minutes in the home defeat to a rather average Sociedad sign.
In fairness, he was very good in our two best performances of the season, against Arsenal and Liverpool, albeit in a much more clearly defined 'old-school- fullback role (in those games specifically) i.e. 'get tight to the winger/wide forward nice and early, play up against them'.
Now we have posters crowing about how somehow they were 'right' that he was a great player all along...hang on a minute...have we lowered standards that far? I get that we're not the 'Man United' of old and need to be patient, I have said that myself, and so it's pointless comparing these lads with the likes of Ferdinand, Scholes, Giggs, (old) Ronaldo, Rooney, Keane etc...
However, in my opinion, we have still not fallen THAT far that a mixed bag of some good, some average, some poor performances suddenly makes a Man United player.
Let's give ETH time, let's support the players but let's not start getting carried away
Yes but if you compare him with the other big 6 RBs, only TAA is better than him at working the ball up the pitch.Well. He completed 79,8% of his attempted passes, which ranked 12th on United among players with at least 10 90s. 4th for progressive passes/90, with 4.95, and also for completed passes into the box/90 (1.3) . But tops for completed crosses into the box/90 (0.45). 13th for expected assists/90, zero actual assists. 10th for Shot Creating Actions/90, 11th for Goal creating actions/90. So that's a fairly mixed picture, even if you just compare him with other players on United.
Yes but if you compare him with the other big 6 RBs, only TAA is better than him at working the ball up the pitch.
And that's last season when most thought he was rubbish and he was playing in an awful team. The fella clearly has the tools to play progressive attacking football. Ten Hag football.
Classic RedCafe. The teams form improves playing a far more conservative system under a much more organised coach, some of the feel-good factor comes back and suddenly all is forgotten and the lads who are currently starting are all amazing players. It's no wonder we bounce up and down emotionally.
Dalot has done well recently, lets be clear about that, however, he was starting from a very, very low base and it couldn't really get much worse.
I have still yet to see any evidence whatsoever that he can contribute in an attacking sense and I'm not sure yet whether his improved defensive performances are down to an upturn in his own form or just more generally the improved attitude and organisation of the team.
To be honest, I would say the same about Malacia. I love his attitude and energy and I think he has loads of raw talent. Yet there's tonnes of work to be done to get him to the level of an Andy Robertson or a Cancelo. So let's not build these players up to be something they are not and then call them names and accuse them of not trying/caring when we have a few bad results and/or when we start to try to play a bit more expansive
Wow, thanks, hadn't caught that. Two goals! Let's hope he just picks up against City right where he left off.
The guy said he'd seen no evidence. Sorry pal, didn't mean to upset you.
Bolded part: 1, By what measure? If you compare him to James' level last season his passing accuracy is much less, he makes much fewer progressive passes, completes fewer crosses into box and much fewer passes into the box, his xA are a fraction of James' as is his SCA and GCA, he has much fewer touches, makes half as many successful dribbles and much fewer progressive carries. in fact, he is consistently and obviously very inferior to James across the board across pretty much every indicator for this part of the game. He's more or less on level with Walker (except for passing accuracy and touches), but that's not a high bar for attacking or on-the-ball impact.
2, his stats so far this year are not really better. In some respects they are worse.
I don't think it's very clear that he's already got the tools to be a high-impact player on the ball. At least he hasn't shown that so far.
Be honest and just admit that he just can't have even a half of these stats