Westminster Politics

:lol:

So the question is which side of the pond can host the best reality TV impeachment show? 24/7 via digital media powered by 5G.

Its gonna be nutsHow the fcuk did it come to all this?.

Pretty sure that our impeachment proceedings will be an afternoon debate followed by a vote to wrap it up.

Trump impeachment process will still be ongoing next April.
 
The Greater London Authority's monitoring officer - whose job it is to monitor the conduct of the mayor and other members - said it had written to the police watchdog, the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC). It said it had referred the PM to the IOPC "so it can assess whether or not it is necessary to investigate the former mayor of London for the criminal offence of misconduct in public office".

It added that it has recorded a "conduct matter" against Mr Johnson which happens when there is information that indicates that a criminal offence may have been committed. But it does not mean that a criminal offence is proved in any way, the GLA's monitoring officer added: "The IOPC will now consider if it is necessary for the matter to be investigated."

The reason the IOPC is involved is because the role of the mayor of London is also London's police and crime commissioner. The IOPC deals with complaints against police forces in England and Wales
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49859321
 
Last edited:
Does it matter? He could drop his trousers at the dispatch box and windmill the opposition front bench, and half the papers and country would still back the fecker
 
Arnott, Hastings and Mate are going to nail the bastard.
 
More often than not the government do the very opposite. The result of protectionism is deaths all around the third world due to the cartel of wealth hoarding via government policy. They're actively promoting the deaths of poor people and we defend them as we've eaten the propaganda that their deaths are in our best interests. The same kind of propaganda used when defending how much worse off we'd all be with the abolition of slavery.

Last year as a random point there were over 26,000 deaths or serious injuries in road traffic accidents. Could you imagine a private company responsible for that level of chaos and death? They'd have gone out of business decades ago. Private industry will circumvent the poor road system by safer autonomous vehicles but it was be hundreds of thousands of deaths too late.

Again I'm not saying the system I'm describing is perfect... But I struggle to see how it wouldn't be better from what I've read.

:lol: Yes, private industry will fix problems by choice rather than being required to. When seatbelts first came out, all manufacturers offered them as options rather than standard until Saab and Volvo eventually made them standard. Ford offered them as options for about a decade before making them standard. Even once they became standard (usually required by law), most people didn't wear them until they were required to by law. Requiring cars to have seatbelts and people to wear them has saved millions of lives. Car companies would not and could not have accomplished that.

For another example, Boeing knew that its 737-MAX had problems with its software and hardware. It offered additional safety features that would have prevented the two crashes that killed ≈ 350 people. After the first crash, did Boeing recall the planes to have them fixed to ensure there would be no further crashes? No, they lobbied governments not to ground them. After the second crash, did Boeing ground the planes? Again, no, they worked hard lobbying the US FAA and other agencies not to ground them. The only airlines who grounded their 737-MAX fleets were the ones who'd had crashes. Others largely kept their planes flying.

The country with the most significant regulatory capture by Boeing took the longest to ground the planes because more libertarian-minded Republican officials were happy to keep it flying until pressure became too great. Regulatory capture of government by industries does untold damage by allowing private companies effectively to self-regulate.

If private industry is so ethical and responsible, why do companies sell lead paint wherever it isn't banned? We've known lead is harmful for more than a century. Why do fossil fuel companies stick with producing fossil fuels that they've known for decades (because they funded the research!) cause climate change?

It is demonstrably false that private industry would be more effective than government at protecting lives or serving the public good. Governments aren't perfect, but you'd have to live in La La Land (aka Gault's Gulch) to believe that private industry is superior.
 
:lol: Yes, private industry will fix problems by choice rather than being required to. When seatbelts first came out, all manufacturers offered them as options rather than standard until Saab and Volvo eventually made them standard. Ford offered them as options for about a decade before making them standard. Even once they became standard (usually required by law), most people didn't wear them until they were required to by law. Requiring cars to have seatbelts and people to wear them has saved millions of lives. Car companies would not and could not have accomplished that.

For another example, Boeing knew that its 737-MAX had problems with its software and hardware. It offered additional safety features that would have prevented the two crashes that killed ≈ 350 people. After the first crash, did Boeing recall the planes to have them fixed to ensure there would be no further crashes? No, they lobbied governments not to ground them. After the second crash, did Boeing ground the planes? Again, no, they worked hard lobbying the US FAA and other agencies not to ground them. The only airlines who grounded their 737-MAX fleets were the ones who'd had crashes. Others largely kept their planes flying.

The country with the most significant regulatory capture by Boeing took the longest to ground the planes because more libertarian-minded Republican officials were happy to keep it flying until pressure became too great. Regulatory capture of government by industries does untold damage by allowing private companies effectively to self-regulate.

If private industry is so ethical and responsible, why do companies sell lead paint wherever it isn't banned? We've known lead is harmful for more than a century. Why do fossil fuel companies stick with producing fossil fuels that they've known for decades (because they funded the research!) cause climate change?

It is demonstrably false that private industry would be more effective than government at protecting lives or serving the public good. Governments aren't perfect, but you'd have to live in La La Land (aka Gault's Gulch) to believe that private industry is superior.

Reminds me of that story about the Ford Pinto in the 70's. A defect was found with the car that meant in some collisions it could potentially jam the doors locked and the fuel tank would explode into the passenger compartment and burn people alive. Ford knew about the defect but crunched the numbers and decided that it was cheaper to pay compensation to the families of those that died (allegedly hundreds) due to the safety defect as opposed to halting production, recalling the cars and fixing the defect.
 
I think people just see the party next to the name and tick a box
 
He's so special, he's a gift to us all



5th column remainer parliament... is he a member of the Nazi party or something?! The problem is I can’t help thinking that the majority of the electorate would rather see us leave the EU than the UK’s democratic principles being protected.
 
Seen multiple MPs having long twitter battles with folk and Sajid Javid calling out the BBC on twitter. Things are getting a bit wierd.
 
5th column remainer parliament... is he a member of the Nazi party or something?! The problem is I can’t help thinking that the majority of the electorate would rather see us leave the EU than the UK’s democratic principles being protected.

Majority of leavers? Perhaps. Majority of the electorate? I doubt it.
 
Prison is too good for these scumbags, destroying a country and ruining lives for profit, they should be tried and executed. Evil like that can not be rehabilitated.
 
Not sure executions are the way to go about things..
I am. Destroying a nations economy, and literally putting lives and livelyhoods at risk to line their own pocket, that's not just selfish, immoral or bad, it's downright evil.
 
So are executions!
In normal circumstances I'd agree with you, but the money these kinds of scumbags have access to? They would buy their freedom back in no time at all and be on to the next nefarious scheme. I'm open to alternatives but don't see any. Except maybe state confiscation of all assets, every single penny, wherever it is hidden away, take the only thing they care about.
 
Seen multiple MPs having long twitter battles with folk and Sajid Javid calling out the BBC on twitter. Things are getting a bit wierd.
All a bit scary now. Not sure how this ends. Probably gets worse before it gets better too - next is a majority Boris government and even more disaster.
 
All a bit scary now. Not sure how this ends. Probably gets worse before it gets better too - next is a majority Boris government and even more disaster.

I'll be amazed if Boris gets a majority. He's fecked if he doesn't get an election before 31st October (which I now think isn't possible anyway).
 
Apparently the police are scrutinising his comments.
 
So he's threatening to stab civil servants in Whitehall, looks completely stoned out of his head, and I can't make out what he says at the end. Getting worried his big pay day may not happen on 31st October.
Bit more flag waving and threats should do it.

"Had enough of all of it."