Herman Toothrot
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2021
- Messages
- 2,088
Honestly, if you think an argument about whether the ship was really struck by a missile or a torpedo amounts to anything good luck!
It's not really that personal to me.
Honestly, if you think an argument about whether the ship was really struck by a missile or a torpedo amounts to anything good luck!
Surely his uncles history is this countries history?
The defence of the Falkland Islands was government policy and was undertaken to protect British interests in that area of the southern hemisphere, including the wishes of the people who lived there. Starmer was stating what most British people would agree with.
I would doubt any Prime Minister would sanction a loss of the Falklands, certainly whilst people who served there, their relatives and heirs that are alive, or until the Falkland islanders themselves wished for things to be different.
Seriously? It's pretty easy to find.
Or do you start off not wanting to believe anything he says and go from there?
Oh right so he's just talking absolute bollocks, much better as long as it's 'what politicians do'.
Yeah, he has a close connection to the NHS. His wife works for the NHS. He thinks that it's something we must protect at all costs.The bigger stupidity is the idea that his uncle's history should have any say on government policy.
Sorry but how much can we trust your memory if you can't even accept the fact that his uncle served in the Navy?No, I had zero opinion on him - I had a view on labour because I remembered the last time.
That and the fact that 97-2010 was so much better than the years that followed it you'd have to be blind not to recognise the decline and destruction caused by the subsequent governments.Sorry but how much can we trust your memory if you can't even accept the fact that his uncle served in the Navy?
Yeah but Gordon Brown, gold, no money left letter etcThat and the fact that 97-2010 was so much better than the years that followed it you'd have to be blind not to recognise the decline and destruction caused by the subsequent governments.
I was high 97% of time back then.Sorry but how much can we trust your memory if you can't even accept the fact that his uncle served in the Navy?
Ah yeah. Shit. That note about having spent all the cash that was obviously meant to be taken at face value. How could I forget?Yeah but Gordon Brown, gold, no money left letter etc
She's Leader of the House. You always get a low turnout for Leader's questions on Thursday morning. It only deals with announcing business for the next week.From that picture it looks like next to no one is interested !
fair enoughI was high 97% of time back then.
Finally some proper policy from the Labour Party
Finally some proper policy from the Labour Party
Is that real?It gets better.
From the story:
Hurley told the BBC he was inspired to launch his campaign after speaking to students at a local school in his constituency.
"The girls were very clued-up about political issues, including assisted dying and the Middle East."
However, he said one of the students also asked if he could launch a petition to cut Freddo bars to 5p.
Another ideology vs pragmatism debate.
Philosophically I abhor this idea, funnelling public money into private healthcare is against everything I believe in.
BUT
Can I stop over 2m people having treatment, ‘for free’ quicker than they would otherwise do, and wipe 1/3 off the NHS waiting lists?
For £1bn, or 1/185th of the annual NHS budget, I think it’s a no-brainer.
Another ideology vs pragmatism debate.
Philosophically I abhor this idea, funnelling public money into private healthcare is against everything I believe in.
BUT
Can I stop over 2m people having treatment, ‘for free’ quicker than they would otherwise do, and wipe 1/3 off the NHS waiting lists?
For £1bn, or 1/185th of the annual NHS budget, I think it’s a no-brainer.
So, for those who can't remember back in the mists of time to those fargone days of 2022, kier starmer said he would r3eplace the house of lords with an elected chamber.
He has 400 MPs to choose from for all these positions, many of whom, like McSweeney's wife, luke akehurst, streeting's former and current partner, were hand chosen by his office and forced onto the local PLP.
And this is what he does. A job for life, at £361 per day.
You are too kind. She will allowed to claim £361 per day tax free, plus expenses, and you only have to turn up. You don't have to speak or vote.
So, for those who can't remember back in the mists of time to those fargone days of 2022, kier starmer said he would r3eplace the house of lords with an elected chamber.
He has 400 MPs to choose from for all these positions, many of whom, like McSweeney's wife, luke akehurst, streeting's former and current partner, were hand chosen by his office and forced onto the local PLP.
And this is what he does. A job for life, at £361 per day.
Her CV suggests she has a lot of experience working with investors, which is probably what you want in a Minister for Investment, in a government crying out for investment. Maybe she's actually the best person for the job, as you imply.She was a founder and led a company that agreed a sale £4.2 billion within the last month. I'm not sure £361 per attendance is as tempting for her as it would be for me.
Her CV suggests she has a lot of experience working with investors, which is probably what you want in a Minister for Investment, in a government crying out for investment. Maybe she's actually the best person for the job, as you imply.
In general, yes. On occasion, no.For government, you want someone elected to represent people.
Why on earth can they charge stuff back from a decade ago? Why so long?Eton among elite private schools set to cash in on windfall from new VAT rules
VAT-registered schools will be able to claim refunds for tax paid on capital projects over past 10 years
https://www.theguardian.com/educati...set-to-cash-in-on-windfall-from-new-vat-rules
The UK’s biggest and richest private schools are in line for substantial financial windfalls as a consequence of the government’s plan to impose VAT on their fees, according to official new guidance issued by tax authorities.
A document issued by HMRC on Thursday made clear that, once registered for VAT, independent schools will be able to claim back the tax they have paid on capital projects such as buildings and land acquisition completed over the past 10 years.
The money would be paid back progressively over the next decade, with the timing and amounts dependent on when the project was finished.
The fact that institutions such as Eton College and other elite private schools will be able to attain a net benefit from the change is causing tension within the independent sector, with those running smaller private schools saying it will widen the gap between them and the richest.
I assume because they are registered as charities (like universities) and therefore can take advantages of the huge tax breaks given to them.Why on earth can they charge stuff back from a decade ago? Why so long?
Why on earth can they charge stuff back from a decade ago? Why so long?
Whoops.Eton among elite private schools set to cash in on windfall from new VAT rules
VAT-registered schools will be able to claim refunds for tax paid on capital projects over past 10 years
https://www.theguardian.com/educati...set-to-cash-in-on-windfall-from-new-vat-rules
The UK’s biggest and richest private schools are in line for substantial financial windfalls as a consequence of the government’s plan to impose VAT on their fees, according to official new guidance issued by tax authorities.
A document issued by HMRC on Thursday made clear that, once registered for VAT, independent schools will be able to claim back the tax they have paid on capital projects such as buildings and land acquisition completed over the past 10 years.
The money would be paid back progressively over the next decade, with the timing and amounts dependent on when the project was finished.
The fact that institutions such as Eton College and other elite private schools will be able to attain a net benefit from the change is causing tension within the independent sector, with those running smaller private schools saying it will widen the gap between them and the richest.
I assume because they are registered as charities (like universities) and therefore can take advantages of the huge tax breaks given to them.
Makes sense, thanks. For most it was cushion the VAT on fees blow to some degree, albeit way more for the loaded ones.Because businesses that charge VAT to supply a service can claim back VAT paid on capital investments made in the provision of that service up to 10 years ago.
Like Universities the most elite will have invested the most in building these facilities and stand to gain the most from the rebates, further stretching the inequality gap.
Makes sense, thanks. For most it was cushion the VAT on fees blow to some degree, albeit way more for the loaded ones.