Well I've read her timeline.
Climate change denial, islamophobia, anti free school meals and anti breakfast clubs, pro North Sea drilling, Labour ruined the country in one week after the election, and worst of all we have is self service checkouts, unlike Dubai.
That’s the problem now though, you see one tweet and you’ll be able to guess with 95% certainty their views on:
- benefits
- Brexit
- Trump
- public sector
- Prince Harry
- Education
- Climate Change
And a whole raft of other topics.
Only took a couple of weeks:
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/scotlan...chool-closes-citing-labour-vat-plan-xxrjf5npz
A few dozen teachers redundant and feck the 300 kids booted out with less than a month to find a new school, those rich Tory bastards.
Think you need a permanent mod to follow you around correcting your assertions at this point.
This article is from last year with the same issues and same claims at the same school:
https://perthgazette.co.uk/2023/06/kilgraston-school-to-permanently-close/
So they already announced they were closing last year then stayed open as they had a buyout which has now fallen through and they're closing again.
bUt lAbOuR vAT
Only took a couple of weeks:
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/scotlan...chool-closes-citing-labour-vat-plan-xxrjf5npz
A few dozen teachers redundant and feck the 300 kids booted out with less than a month to find a new school, those rich Tory bastards.
Think you need a permanent mod to follow you around correcting your assertions at this point.
This article is from last year with the same issues and same claims at the same school:
https://perthgazette.co.uk/2023/06/kilgraston-school-to-permanently-close/
So they already announced they were closing last year then stayed open as they had a buyout which has now fallen through and they're closing again.
bUt lAbOuR vAT
Jesus Christ man, have you got a Google alert set up? That school had had problems for ages.
Also… yeah. It sucks that 300 kids need to find new schools. But putting those 300 kids before thousands of other children just rings hollow.
We are short on teachers, so they’ll be fine.
I appreciate that you and I fundamentally disagree on private schools. I celebrate removing their tax breaks, and I’d go further and apply a tax penalty that’s paid to the state to send a kid to one.
But ultimately, if you’re tub thumping for the free market at every turn, these are the consequences. A school that can’t cut costs to rework how they operate to function in the market, has failed based on market conditions.
I could meet you somewhere near the middle and suggest that Labour could have brought in VAT on all enrolments from next September. Or perhaps gone 10% for 2 years, then 20%, but only on the condition that schools didn’t raise costs on parents for those two years.
But ultimately… whatever brings about the demise of private schools as swiftly as possible, is absolutely fine by me. Probably makes me an absolute whopper in your eyes and I get that.
I read the Times and it popped up. School closures are probably going to be news for at least a year or two.
Where you and I disagree is what the end result of this will be and I'm ok to concede neither of us knows who will be right, but at least you understand the dynamics of it.
I happen to agree with you that private schools shouldn't exist and they do promote inequality, but where we differ is i dont think fecking kids' education for the next 10 years is the way to go about addressing it, and i dont think it will make a jot of difference to the state system.
Just bring back grammar schools and/or have more faith schools at secondary level.Only took a couple of weeks:
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/scotlan...chool-closes-citing-labour-vat-plan-xxrjf5npz
A few dozen teachers redundant and feck the 300 kids booted out with less than a month to find a new school, those rich Tory bastards.
Her world must be so confusing.I like that she thought the interviewer put it there!
After she had just said" it's the economy, stupid" as well. Masterful workThis is the actions of a person that should be knighted.
You're not quite up to speed on how this kind of thing works are you.
An organisation that's in a weak position to begin with is going to be more at risk to external shocks such as an additional tax charge. Does that really need explaining to you?
So yes, every school that goes under is probably going to be in a precarious position to begin with. And any investor that's giving them money is going to recalculate their figures to decide if the risk has become too great. Ps. you can replace the word school with any other word you like there.
Doesn’t really mean much currently but might be the first time Reform have polled in second place
It backs Farage's claim, issued immediately after the GE result, that REFORM is now coming for Labour.
It backs Farage's claim, issued immediately after the GE result, that REFORM is now coming for Labour.
Does Google need explaining to you?
I appreciate your commitment to always doubling down. The reason they backed out was the ill health of the chairman of Achieve Education the company that was keeping them afloat. This is in their letter to parents and other non Tory leaning news sites but it's clear that school was never staying open. They like most boarding schools took a huge hit from the absence of international boarders during COVID and they're not able to recover.
When it's guiding your politics and you're trying to prove a point I suggest reading beyond editors subheadlines. You must know it presents a biased view aimed at intentionally misleading the reader. You might agree with their politics but it doesn't mean you take them on faith.
I think we are seeing the beginning of the re-shaping of British politics.You think? I think it's just they're still riding a bit of success from the election and normality hasn't sunk in yet. Once the Tories get a new leader in and the usual media stand firmly behind them the Tories will gain back their foothold.
I do think Reform may end up rising to be a force in a few years but I think they need the election cycle to give them relevance, much like the Lib Dems.
Clwyd West MS: Porn star follow was ‘accidental click’
https://www.denbighshirefreepress.c...BeJyFCrTCx-nOLtFYA_aem_HDE_rlrmVJT4zrJErY-xEA
The government is facing questions about a second appointment to a senior civil service role of a person linked to previous donations to the Labour Party.
Emily Middleton was named a director general in the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), where the secretary of state is Peter Kyle.
She was previously a partner at consultancy firm Public Digital, which paid for her secondment to Mr Kyle's office in opposition - a donation in kind of more than £65,000.
The Tories have described it as a "growing scandal of appointing donors to top civil service jobs".
A government spokesperson said the appointment was made " in line with the civil service rules on recruitment”.
The Tories have asked the government's top civil servant what was known about the donations when Ms Middleton got the job and what role Mr Kyle played in that process.
Separately, Chancellor Rachel Reeves is under pressure to say whether she was involved in the appointment of former banker and Labour donor Ian Corfield as director of investment at the Treasury.
In opposition, Labour repeatedly accused the Conservatives of "cronyism" in appointing their political friends to public bodies.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyx7krvn44o
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...rning-speeches-international-speaking-circuitSuella Braverman is the latest senior Tory to be cashing in on the international speaking circuit, as it was revealed she was paid nearly £60,000 for making speeches around the world, the highest of any current MP.
The former home secretary received £25,000 to speak in South Korea in May, according to the first register of MPs’ financial interests of this parliament, and she received £20,000 for another speaking engagement in India in March. Braverman also declared that she received £14,000 for articles she wrote for the Telegraph, and she also had an all-expenses trip to Israel worth £27,800 paid for by the National Jewish Assembly.
Last month Braverman declared she received £11,800 for a five-hour talk to a financial intelligence and risk control firm in London, and she also made a speech in Washington during which she was paid £6,500 in expenses for the trip by the Edmund Burke Foundation.
The former prime minister Liz Truss made £250,000 the year after she was ousted from No 10, including £80,000 for one speech in Taipei, Taiwan.
that edmund burke foundation is another of these 'socially conservative' think tanks that seems to accrue a lot of media time and has some siginificant funding above and beyond its actual output.Some companies have way more money than sense.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...rning-speeches-international-speaking-circuit
Disappointed in Taiwan.
Some companies have way more money than sense.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...rning-speeches-international-speaking-circuit
Disappointed in Taiwan.
That’s chicken feed compared to Johnson.Some companies have way more money than sense.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...rning-speeches-international-speaking-circuit
Disappointed in Taiwan.
You'd probably come out of there radicalised and further right than Himmler.A five hour talk?! Jesus Christ. Can you imagine being stuck in that room? The horror.
Yep and even Farage and his GB News earnings too. Still, kind of surprised she earns that much, given she hasn't an ounce of the charisma middle England finds in Johnson and Farage.That’s chicken feed compared to Johnson.
We're shorter on pupils as well - school rolls are falling by around 75,000/year across the country, with 12% or so of school places unfilled across England in primary and secondary schools in 2022, the highest level since 2009. 90 primary schools in England were/are at risk of closure due to these pressures, but hey the private school brigade aren't writing about that.Jesus Christ man, have you got a Google alert set up? That school had had problems for ages.
Also… yeah. It sucks that 300 kids need to find new schools. But putting those 300 kids before thousands of other children just rings hollow.
We are short on teachers, so they’ll be fine.
Who pays someone was PM for 5 minutes that much money? Surely the only story she has to tell is how she fecked it up so badly.Some companies have way more money than sense.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...rning-speeches-international-speaking-circuit
Disappointed in Taiwan.
Too busy shagging to get the numbers up maybeWe're shorter on pupils as well - school rolls are falling by around 75,000/year across the country, with 12% or so of school places unfilled across England in primary and secondary schools in 2022, the highest level since 2009. 90 primary schools in England were/are at risk of closure due to these pressures, but hey the private school brigade aren't writing about that.