M16Red
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2011
- Messages
- 3,726
That poor man.Starmer playing one of the New Labour classics, leaking someone who is getting up the party's nose's name to the press.
We now go live to Harrowdown Hill.
That poor man.Starmer playing one of the New Labour classics, leaking someone who is getting up the party's nose's name to the press.
We now go live to Harrowdown Hill.
To be fair, I support this. All the alternatives are worse. Once a solar farm has reached the end of it's lifespan, that land is still there and can be returned to it's original state quickly. And while it may be classed as agricultural land, if it were being used to grow crops, it would be. As it is, most of these sites are fallow, unused land with only potential to be used for food.
This MP has rightly questioned how we need to involve foreign investment and support from the likes of China in order to build nuclear power plants here. People also don't want to live near those, and they leave a 1000 year legacy of contamination alongside the other environmental and security risks, so maybe he should get on board with supporting the alternatives.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/rachel-reeves-trump-uk-chancellor-b2686094.html
We've just promised to turn Britain into the world's leading AI slop mill, why aren't you more excited? Put some more pep in your step and eat up this slop you disgusting fecking pigs.
These menus sound good on paper, but when mass catered for 200 people they often up pretty bland.anyone who picks a packed lunch over a state banquet is a feckin trying to hard to pretend to be common moron.
this was on the menu at the qataris invite in dec...
On the menu was a tartlet of Cornish lobster and quails eggs for a starter; with pheasant wrapped in Savoy cabbage, roasted celeriac puree and potato gratin with cheese from Suffolk, truffle sauce and winter vegetables as a main course; followed by an iced bombe with organic Samoan vanilla ice cream and a Balmoral plum sorbet.
yes true. although i thought they had gone all out for our Qatari overlords, as i did read it as Ice Bombs made with Organic Samoans. which lets be honest, even The Fat Duck would draw a line at.These menus sound good on paper, but when mass catered for 200 people they often up pretty bland.
You'll generally eat far better at a decent restaurant.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/rachel-reeves-trump-uk-chancellor-b2686094.html
We've just promised to turn Britain into the world's leading AI slop mill, why aren't you more excited? Put some more pep in your step and eat up this slop you disgusting fecking pigs.
Did you read the interview? She just says it would be good to echo his positivity and talk up the country. It's a slightly overegged headline for a dry interview.Why in the hell are we trying to follow his example? The UK needs to distance itself from the US.
Heh, that would be more interesting at least.yes true. although i thought they had gone all out for our Qatari overlords, as i did read it as Ice Bombs made with Organic Samoans. which lets be honest, even The Fat Duck would draw a line at.
I didn’t read the interview, I admit. And yes, their environmental unfriendliness is very bad.Did you read the interview? She just says it would be good to echo his positivity and talk up the country. It's a slightly overegged headline for a dry interview.
I'm concerned Labour seems ok with overriding environmental protections.
Tbh thats more evidence Reeves hasn’t listen to a Trump speech.Did you read the interview? She just says it would be good to echo his positivity and talk up the country. It's a slightly overegged headline for a dry interview.
I'm concerned Labour seems ok with overriding environmental protections.
Yep, every reference to America being great is sandwiched between confrontational rhetoric and putdowns of others.Tbh thats more evidence Reeves hasn’t listen to a Trump speech.
Did you read the interview? She just says it would be good to echo his positivity and talk up the country. It's a slightly overegged headline for a dry interview.
I'm concerned Labour seems ok with overriding environmental protections.
Reeves might kybosh some of the worst stuff, like pumping billions into carbon capture. Given our flat is in Brook Green, fecking hope net zero stops the third runway at Heathrow turning it into a flightpath.But at the same time pressing ahead with daft growth stifling Net Zero projects whilst all our peers are winding back on them.
It's almost like they don't have a plan.
The AI stuff is delusional and of no benefit to the population, and would apparently need these nuclear Small Modular Reactors to power it. Literally nobody wants them. If they're protesting solar farms because they temporarily cover up some grass, what will they think of having uranium reactors in their neighbourhoods. It's pure folly.That’s fair enough but I think it’s all nonsense and we certainly aren’t going to become a world leading AI powerhouse by relying on the sun and the wind.
Considering we are hell bent on the pointless task of also being world leaders in low carbon emissions, the only feasible current answer is nuclear power. We will figure this out a decade too late.
.Some Labour strategists believe there is little point taking on Farage because he poses more of a damaging threat to the Conservatives, eating into the vote share on the right.
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...-farage-miserabilist-declinist-vision-britain
Reeves might kybosh some of the worst stuff, like pumping billions into carbon capture. Given our flat is in Brook Green, fecking hope net zero stops the third runway at Heathrow turning it into a flightpath.
She told us this is who she is over a decade ago and we had cnuts telling us she'd changed since then
Also
.
Also Reeves
Exactly. She’s outflanking the Tories from the right. She’s even more harmful to benefits claimants than the Tories. That’s why I wasn’t that happy on the day after the general election last year; because I knew that both parties are neoliberal fecking filth who hate disabled people like me, as well as of course numerous other minority groups.She told us this is who she is over a decade ago and we had cnuts telling us she'd changed since then
I agree, it is pure nimbyism on my part. I'd rather they added an extra runway at Gatwick.Not wanting to accuse you of nimbyism, and speaking as somebody in the original HS2 path, it's this kind of thinking we need to eradicate in the UK. There is always somebody negatively impacted and they're given far too much of a voice in the UK. The result is nothing ever gets done. Heathrow should have had a 3rd runway 20 years ago and the full HS2 should be halfway finished by now.
that is her packed lunch.anyone who picks a packed lunch over a state banquet is a feckin trying to hard to pretend to be common moron.
this was on the menu at the qataris invite in dec...
On the menu was a tartlet of Cornish lobster and quails eggs for a starter; with pheasant wrapped in Savoy cabbage, roasted celeriac puree and potato gratin with cheese from Suffolk, truffle sauce and winter vegetables as a main course; followed by an iced bombe with organic Samoan vanilla ice cream and a Balmoral plum sorbet.
Yep she hasn’t change.She told us this is who she is over a decade ago and we had cnuts telling us she'd changed since then
.She added: "It is not an either/or question. We would be tougher [than the Conservatives]. If they don't take it [the offer of a job] they will forfeit their benefit. But there will also be the opportunities there under a Labour government.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/oct/12/labour-benefits-tories-labour-rachel-reeves-welfare
Probably due to the nature of our economy. There is an ever increasing amount of palms being greased before any work actually starts.I agree, it is pure nimbyism on my part. I'd rather they added an extra runway at Gatwick.
The fact everythimg that everything costs at least 4x more to build in the UK than mainland Europe needs urgently addressing. Even after the consultations into why, governments with big majorities do feck all about it.
Ministers have shut down or dropped at least half a dozen artificial intelligence prototypes intended for the welfare system, the Guardian has learned, in a sign of the headwinds facing Keir Starmer’s effort to increase government efficiency.
Pilots of AI technology to enhance staff training, improve the service in jobcentres, speed up disability benefit payments and modernise communication systems are not being taken forward, freedom of information (FoI) requests reveal.
Officials have internally admitted that ensuring AI systems are “scalable, reliable [and] thoroughly tested” are key challenges and say there have been many “frustrations and false starts”.
Not all trials would be expected to make it into regular use, but two of those now scrapped had been highlighted by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in its latest annual report as examples of how it had “successfully tested multiple generative AI proofs of concept”.
A-cubed was intended to help staff steer jobseekers into work. Aigent was supposed to accelerate personal independence payments relied on by millions of people with disabilities.
This month the prime minister declared “AI is the way … to transform our public services” and wrote to all cabinet ministers “tasking them with driving AI adoption and growth … and making that a top priority for their departments”.
“Unsuccessful pilots and trials aren’t necessarily a cause for concern, as they offer an opportunity to improve, but these failures raise important questions for the government’s approach to AI in the public sector,” said Imogen Parker, associate director at the Ada Lovelace Institute, an independent research body focused on data and AI. “Are the right lessons being learned and acted upon, and does the reality of AI match the rhetoric?”
No information about AI used by the DWP in the welfare system has yet been disclosed on the government algorithm transparency register, which has been a requirement across Whitehall for almost a year.
Officials say the time spent on the pilot software is not wasted, as the technology could later appear as part of a system that is rolled out, and thorough testing is essential prior to rollouts. But the move illustrates the complexities of Labour’s hope to deploy AI to revolutionise public services and increase economic productivity.
This week Peter Kyle, the secretary of state for science, innovation and technology, announced a “blueprint for a modern digital government” and said his department “will put AI to work, speeding up our ability to deliver our Plan for Change, improve lives and drive growth”.
Writing in December after a year of running i.AI, the Whitehall AI incubator, its director, Laura Gilbert, admitted “there have been abundant blockers, frustrations and false starts”, but said “if something fails, we try, try again and find another route to impact”.
She said that of 57 ideas tested, 11 made it to rollout in various stages of testing and scaling. She added it has been working with US AI firms including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Microsoft.
DWP officials told tech companies at a private meeting in August that making sure “products are scalable, reliable [and] thoroughly tested” are key challenges in moving AI systems from proofs of concept [POC] to full use, according to meeting notes released under FoI. They showed that “approximately 9 POCs have so far been completed” and “one POC has gone live, one is in the process of going live”.
It’s encouraging that the public sector isn’t taking a rigid or dogmatic approach to AI, particularly in welfare, where the risks of amplifying inequalities and causing real injustice are significant,” said Parker. “Yet a lack of transparency remains a critical issue … [It] should not depend on journalistic investigation – openness, evaluation, and learning must be central to the government’s strategy.”
The DWP declined to comment on the specific reasons AI pilots were dropped, but said considerations can include technological maturity, business readiness, business value, and scalability. It said it rigorously tests how much value the technology provides to officials and the public and its value for money.
A government spokesperson said: “Proof of concept projects are deliberately short, enabling new and innovative technologies to be explored and prototyped – not all projects are expected to become long-term, and the learning from them can be used in the future.
“This aligns with our ‘scan, pilot, scale’ approach set out in the AI opportunities action plan – because we recognise the tremendous potential of AI to transform our public services and save taxpayers billions.”
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/27/ai-prototypes-uk-welfare-system-dropped
AI prototypes for UK welfare system dropped as officials lament ‘false starts’
If you mean Brook Green between Shepard's Bush and Hammersmith, you are well fecking lucky.Reeves might kybosh some of the worst stuff, like pumping billions into carbon capture. Given our flat is in Brook Green, fecking hope net zero stops the third runway at Heathrow turning it into a flightpath.
Deregulation is a great thing.*For God’s sake. Deregulation only makes us less safe.
Won't be that lucky if we have 120 planes flying low over our heads every hour. The flight path I saw in the original discussions years back flew right over Hammersmith & Fulham. Gatwick and its environs is way less residential and also far less polluted already.If you mean Brook Green between Shepard's Bush and Hammersmith, you are well fecking lucky.
A third runway wouldn't be another one across London city,. Pointless because of the prevailing winds. So Brooke Green, and all of the local prep schools, won't be disturbed.
Mate, most of West London should be repurposed for housing. Basically, everything between Heathrow and Slough should be developed. Most of the people in that area either work in Heathrow or are in Heathrow adjacent industries.