Ekeke
Full Member
Fergie said he considered Villa but he also stated that the combination of his high transfer fee and large salary didn't represent value for money.
Where?
Fergie said he considered Villa but he also stated that the combination of his high transfer fee and large salary didn't represent value for money.
Why not ? We've seen players staring for this club at 18/19, we're famous for that. Bringing a £30m midfielder will harm their long term prospects at the club. We've been average away from home this season, because we're crying out for a strong, tough tackling midfielder that can break up play and organize our midfield. I feel we've got enough flair. Take Rooney for example, he's miles better in the hole than Sneijder, and I sill have high hopes for someone like Anderson who needs a full pre season behind him to show what he can do. Bringing a £30m + midfielder on 170k per week is not the answer.
Who has been a regular first-team midfielder for United at age 18/19?
Ronaldo; bought for 12.5m
Fletcher; made debut in 2003, became a 'regular' aged nineteen, granted but still not nailed down a constant first team place.
Anderson? Bought for 18m, still not nailed down a first team place.
Even Scholes was 20 before he got a good run and it wasn't until Eric left he became a first-teamer full time.
Fergie said he considered Villa but he also stated that the combination of his high transfer fee and large salary didn't represent value for money.
Why not ? We've seen players staring for this club at 18/19, we're famous for that. Bringing a £30m midfielder will harm their long term prospects at the club. We've been average away from home this season, because we're crying out for a strong, tough tackling midfielder that can break up play and organize our midfield. I feel we've got enough flair. Take Rooney for example, he's miles better in the hole than Sneijder, and I sill have high hopes for someone like Anderson who needs a full pre season behind him to show what he can do. Bringing a £30m + midfielder on 170k per week is not the answer.
How many more seasons are we going to get away with that excuse for Anderson?
Why not ? We've seen players staring for this club at 18/19, we're famous for that. Bringing a £30m midfielder will harm their long term prospects at the club. We've been average away from home this season, because we're crying out for a strong, tough tackling midfielder that can break up play and organize our midfield. I feel we've got enough flair. Take Rooney for example, he's miles better in the hole than Sneijder, and I sill have high hopes for someone like Anderson who needs a full pre season behind him to show what he can do. Bringing a £30m + midfielder on 170k per week is not the answer.
Please do tell me who exactly has nailed a first team place at age 18 and who exactly has STARED for United when they were 18 except maybe for Rooney. Ronaldo started playing for us maybe when he was 18 but was he a star when he started playing for us?
And Rooney is MILES better than Sneidjer in the hole behind the striker? What bollocks are you talking? This is like the first season he is playing there consistently. When Ronaldo was here, he was on the left. Last season he played up top and was an out and out striker. Sneidjer has been playing in that position for some years now.
On the flip side of that this is the summer where we will be losing significant experience from the squad, Neville already gone, VDS on his way, quite possibly Scholes as well, Giggs how many seasons left? It's all very well buying young players when the squad already has an abundance of experience but when those players start retiring then you then need to address the balance
Where do you want Rooney (& Chicharito) to play if we buy Sneijder ?
You'd have to back two or three years to find my last post in this forum and that was probably a wum.....but if we sign Sneider I'll break down with excitement like a School Girl at a Justin Beiber concert.
I think he would fit right into our team and would add energy, pace, creativeness, goals and just sheer class to it.
Break the bank for him Fergie.
Sneijder through ball onto a Hernandez, Nani or Valencia run.
I'm not saying that they will start at the Emirates next season for us. I'm only saying that given our current financial situation, there are better options than buying Sneijder who is again a brilliant playmaker but would cost a fortune. One of those is to gradually blood youngsters into the first team. We rarely sign established stars anyways.
You'd have to back two or three years to find my last post in this forum and that was probably a wum.....but if we sign Sneider I'll break down with excitement like a School Girl at a Justin Beiber concert.
I think he would fit right into our team and would add energy, pace, creativeness, goals and just sheer class to it.
Break the bank for him Fergie.
If a guy has played only in one league and he comes here, he might not make it. This guy is experienced, played in the biggest leagues in the world. He has played in the biggest stages football can offer and proved himself. What makes you think he won't click?
Look at Diego Forlan. He came straight from the South American league to the Premier League. Hence he struggled to adapt. Tim Vickery was saying if United got Forlan three years ago after he had spent 4-5 years in Europe adapting, he would have flourished under us. He moved to a big club in a big league too soon.
Sneidjer is not like that. He has played for the two biggest clubs in two of the biggest leagues outside England and for Holland in a WC final and he did great for them. I know the English game is harder and maybe more physical, but if he has shown he can adapt to leagues quickly and can do the job.
Pretty sure he never said that, more like that he wanted to go to Barca and there was nothing we could do about it
You got me all wrong, fella; I'm agreeing with you.
I'm stating to GCHQ or whatever he's called he's placing far too much emphasis on this resale value nonsense when Sneijder for me would be a clear winner in the Premiership.
You got me all wrong, fella; I'm agreeing with you.
I'm stating to GCHQ or whatever he's called he's placing far too much emphasis on this resale value nonsense when Sneijder for me would be a clear winner in the Premiership.
Yup, he also made comments, around the time that he confirmed his interest in Villa, about the combination of a large transfer fee and huge salary being extremely expensive and not representing value for money. Admittedly he didn't mention Villa by name and he might have been making a general point on the issue.
I remember that, he said the outlay of £30M on a player was not a problem, it was the fact that by the time you factor in the crazy wages the price is £70M.
If Scholes retires though Fergie may treat himself to a bit of proven class to add in to our already bulging youth group.
It all depends on which players you'd classify as ''proven class''. If you're talking about players like Carrick for instance at the time we signed him from Tottenham then I'd agree. Even though I consider Modric as a pretty unrealistic target this Summer I'd still consider him a possibility. I see no possibility whatsoever of us signing Sneijder.
I remember that, he said the outlay of £30M on a player was not a problem, it was the fact that by the time you factor in the crazy wages the price is £70M.
If Scholes retires though Fergie may treat himself to a bit of proven class to add in to our already bulging youth group.
It all depends on which players you'd classify as ''proven class''. If you're talking about players like Carrick for instance at the time we signed him from Tottenham then I'd agree. Even though I consider Modric as a pretty unrealistic target this Summer I'd still consider him a possibility. I see no possibility whatsoever of us signing Sneijder.
Utd have spent close to £85m on Ferdinand since signing him taking in his wages & initial fee.
What's the point about the wages? Fergie wanted him and considered him at Utd...
I was just repeating what Fergie said about the wages being the problem with buying top players. Every £30M player wants a 100K a week right off the bat at the very least.
Yeah but what Fergie's saying is a consoling after-thought in not getting him. He would have been happy paying it had he got him.
As I say, Ferdinand has been on £100k for nine years, Rooney will be on similar figures soon, you pay this because you have to pay it for quality.
You mean that Modric who's a year younger than Sneijder?
Murrrr!!!!
I don't want to get into the whole Glazer thing but Ferdinand was bought and paid for in a different era at the club, in Rooney's case he has been with us from being a boy and his pay has gradually increased to what it is. If the reports on the Sneijder deal are true he wants parity with Rooney right away, now given his pedigree that is fair enough I guess, but whether the club want two players on Rooney sized salaries is something I am unsure of.
When I was talking of proven class I don't see a huge gulf between Modric and Sneijder, although I rate the latter higher. I simply meant the type of player who has some top level experience and who could come in and be a fist teamer right away.
I'm not saying I think Sniejder is the be all and end all as some seem to feel, I am personally disappointed that Real have pulled off the £8M Sahin coup, he was my ideal "Muppet" buy for our midfield, if Fergie finds a similar player and deal then count me chuffed.
No no, let's get into the Glazer thing; are you saying we've bought no-one of significance in the transfer market since May 2005? Because I can think of Evra, Vidic, Carrick, Anderson, Nani, (Tevez), Berbatov, Smalling and Hernandez; that's a fair outlay and consistent in previous spending the decade prior to the Glazer's arrival.
The Glazer's have nothing to do with it, the transfer funds have been made available when required as evidenced in the above examples. As for the wage structure, that remains quite hefty too, just because not all of them are on 100K a week doesn't mean any of these lot are struggling by any means and do better than most Premiership players.
So somebody at the level of Carrick when he was at Tottenham, Modric* or as you say Dortmund's Sahin before Madrid signed him. I agree with that. There has to be a reasonable possibility that we'd sign a player at that level, especially if Scholes retires. A player at a second/third tier club, in the 22-25 year age range, who would see joining United as the biggest challenge of his career and who wouldn't demand ridiculous, Sneijder-esque wages.
*Spurs would more than likely demand a ridiculously large transfer fee so he probably isn't a realistic target. But a player of that calibre at another second tier club would be what we're looking for.
That wasn't what I said, the players you list weren't coming in as the main man in an Inter side that won a treble and the guy who was the focal point to Holland's World Cup final run, who would be wanting close to the 200k a week salary Rooney is on. I think we can afford a quality buy and we do pay good wages, but there are limits IMO.
Til he actually has a pre season behind himHow many more seasons are we going to get away with that excuse for Anderson?
Christ almightly. Are you being deliberately thick?
My reasoning behind United not signing Sneijder is due to a COMBINATION of his age, his attitude/mentality, his salary demands and his transfer fee. There are also some pretty reasonable doubts about how he would fit into the team but you don't even need to consider that in order to rule this transfer out.
He just wouldn't represent anything close to decent value for money. The risk/reward ratio is terrible and we haven't even talked about his history of injury problems.
I've no doubt that we could afford to sign the player but it wouldn't be a smart acquisition and to quote David Gill: ''It's highly unlikely that we would want to go to those levels (of spending). We don't think it's necessary.''