Is there an age minimum? If not there should be
Perhaps. How would you enforce that rule though?
Is there an age minimum? If not there should be
Impossible to be sure, but a proxy might be possible, like:Perhaps. How would you enforce that rule though?
I know intelligent 14 year old posters. And terrible posters who are much older. Don't really see what age has got to do with it.Is there an age minimum? If not there should be
So, long story short, ban Pogba.Impossible to be sure, but a proxy might be possible, like:
1. Average over .5 emoticons per post
2. Mention Drake
3. Know what "dabbing" is
=>80% chance of being 13
Therefore: autoban
I know intelligent 14 year old posters. And terrible posters who are much older. Don't really see what age has got to do with it.
Yes and make sure he knows the da Silvas have been promoted ahead of him.So, long story short, ban Pogba.
Also, Ji-Sung Park.Yes and make sure he knows the da Silvas have been promoted ahead of him.
I know intelligent 14 year old posters. And terrible posters who are much older. Don't really see what age has got to do with it.
I know intelligent 14 year old posters. And terrible posters who are much older. Don't really see what age has got to do with it.
Perhaps. How would you enforce that rule though?
I try not to read too much in that thread but does just seem like the same pointless comments just to get to the 1000 page mark, I wish a mod would just close it or delete a huge chunk of itThe Pogba thread is absolutely horrific, but it is not primarily driven by newbies. They have merely contributed to the heady mix of circular arguments, weak "jokes", stupid questions to which the answers are either obvious or impossible to answer, increasingly futile attempts by mods to control the riot, clever meta observations on the thread and quips about muppets and masturbation. Yes, they've probably increased the % of puerile and illiterate teenage wailing spurted therein, but it's experienced posters who are the driving force of the productionised and metronomic posting of bollocks and are certainly the primary proud exponents of "let's get to 10000 posts" (edit: it's a 1000 pages isn't it? Who cares) feckwittery.
For sure. A lot of the deleted posts have been by mains members who've been around for a few years (some for over a decade) and should know better. Newbies see it and think it's okay, and so quality goes down further.The Pogba thread is absolutely horrific, but it is not primarily driven by newbies. They have merely contributed to the heady mix of circular arguments, weak "jokes", stupid questions to which the answers are either obvious or impossible to answer, increasingly futile attempts by mods to control the riot, clever meta observations on the thread and quips about muppets and masturbation. Yes, they've probably increased the % of puerile and illiterate teenage wailing spurted therein, but it's experienced posters who are the driving force of the productionised and metronomic posting of bollocks and are certainly the primary proud exponents of "let's get to 10000 posts" (edit: it's a 1000 pages isn't it? Who cares) feckwittery.
The noobs is shite because everyone posts tryhard rubbish to get likes, the activity levels are crap so half the threads are nonsense. Maybe let mains posters post in noobs to generate better threads if you won't do away with it.
Actually think that could work to an extent. What if mains, or some of the mains (over a certain amount of posts?) were allowed to post 5 times a day down there (or unlimited) but not create threads? It'd alleviate constant try-hard posting and possibly make it easier to spot posters that would benefit the mains community?
Yeah, fewer newbies getting promoted and many people leaving the site after registering and discovering they have to wait ages to be able to respond to posts in the mains.Why wasn't/isn't the old system working?
Not enough people coming through? Too much work?
I don't really remember 'discussion' in the newbie section, what you get are people attempting to post thoughtful individual posts to get likes, but not really two-way discussion. These people just need to change their expectations a bit about the newbie forum and treat it for what it is...it should be possible to get promoted in 100 posts if you really try, just don't expect a normal forum experience whilst doing that.Talking with some folks on a different forum, they are complaining that Red Café (especially in the newbie section) is difficult to move around in, not clear where to go for football discussion, generally confusing. It has been a while since I was down in the newbie's but I don't remember having that problem. Out of curiosity and in an attempt to help, could someone post a few screen shots of the newbie area, like the forum section list, maybe a page from each section so I can see if I can help them out.
It is possible they are just idiots, but who knows.
Yep. A few have been promoted in the past week with 100 or fewer posts.I don't really remember 'discussion' in the newbie section, what you get are people attempting to post thoughtful individual posts to get likes, but not really two-way discussion. These people just need to change their expectations a bit about the newbie forum and treat it for what it is...it should be possible to get promoted in 100 posts if you really try, just don't expect a normal forum experience whilst doing that.
Newbies should be treat as a different forum really. You can expect to be there for a good few months if you're not that active. Just pick the right discussions to get involved in and post decent stuff and you will get noticed. There's no rush to leave there really as its pretty decent in its own right if i remember. Not that i would want to go back there
Just as i was starting to like it hereSend all the baldies back down.
They are all proper wastemen.
I don't really remember 'discussion' in the newbie section, what you get are people attempting to post thoughtful individual posts to get likes, but not really two-way discussion. These people just need to change their expectations a bit about the newbie forum and treat it for what it is...it should be possible to get promoted in 100 posts if you really try, just don't expect a normal forum experience whilst doing that.
There's actually a thread about why Pulisic isn't a United target??
Yep. Come to think of it, been a while since the last newbie game.On another note, are @Akshay and @Mciahel Goodman scouts now? WW activity in the noobs must be at an all-time low.
pretty much.On another note, are @Akshay and @Mciahel Goodman scouts now? WW activity in the noobs must be at an all-time low.
We should do this again...
GK: Split
Defense: City
Midfield: City
Attack: City
Manager: City
Youtube page: City
Really? Not considering age, why is DDG better than Bravo exactly? Because United allowed more goals than City or the fact United has lost 3 straight games.
Next 3 out of 4 games: Leicester City, Liverpool and Chelsea. Who knows, Stoke might get their first win
Don't worry guys, we will revisit this after the Chelsea game.
The posts have been noticed and disliked by the scouts. If this is the level of quality he continues to bring to the forum, he'll be gone.When clowns with 1 like are allowed to post in the mains...
The posts have been noticed and disliked by the scouts. If this is the level of quality he continues to bring to the forum, he'll be gone.
Just look at his contributions to the FC Bayern thread. Guy's a wum wonder.
I think that's due to the regular posters usually making trash posts.It doesn't work. The quality is much poorer.
I think that's due to the regular posters usually making trash posts.