Ace of Spades
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2013
- Messages
- 5,588
Starting to really annoy me. Need to upgrade on him no doubt, but unfortunately still far more important positions to sort still.
His role is to create chances.Thought he was really good, worked his ass off, kept the ball.
His role is to create chances.
And he didn't keep the ball well. He wasted so many crosses and produced nothing from the reminder of his play.
Truly a player who is too big for his boots
Quite telling that the thing that people normally come back to to defend his performances is his stamina and work rate.
I’ve yet to see anything to convince me that our best midfield isn’t Casemiro - McTominay - Eriksen
Yeah, just like you’ll ignore his pass percentage completion and actual performance in the rest of the 11 matches he’s played this season.Well and his 7 key passes and 87% pass completion.
Ignore that though.
I’ve yet to see anything to convince me that our best midfield isn’t Casemiro - McTominay - Eriksen
Yeah, just like you’ll ignore his pass percentage completion and actual performance in the rest of the 11 matches he’s played this season.
Damn good comparisonThe Russell Westbrook of the footballing world.
Simply can't win with him.
Damn good comparison
Both players can fill a stat sheet, but ultimately their overplay leaves a lot to be desired. Who is a better comparison in the NBA?It's a trash comparison
It's a trash comparison
The Russell Westbrook of the footballing world.
Simply can't win with him.
I can't fecking understand why he is never benched or subbed, even tough he is rubbish. Should be playing in the Portuguese league or as a sub for Eriksen.
Our Midfield first choice should always be Casemiro Fred/Mc tom and Eriksen, Bruno as sub.
Here's a stat for you.7 key passes, 87% pass completion. Better completion than Casemiro and Martinez.
He’s the cafs new scapegoat.
^^ Wasn't the grand conclusion of his fans that passing percentage doesn't matter because he is a CAM and is supposed to take risks? Or has that changed for that particular game. Bruno isn't in great form at all. He might be busy and for sure he is contributing something but he should be critiqued just as any other player. And that means, that the best players will receive the most flak after a bad performance. Which we have witnessed last night. Us struggling against Cyprus teams wasn't just on him but he was part of the crew, and I'll happily give him 3 or 4 skied attempts, but as soon as that line is crossed, things have to change.Well and his 7 key passes and 87% pass completion.
Ignore that though.
Here's a stat for you.
No goals until the 92nd minute against the 7th team in Cyprus. And our main creator did about feck all about that except stupid passes, overhit crosses and generally waving his arms uselessly while panicking himself and the whole team.
The guy is not cut out for top level possession sides who want to dominate opposition and exert pressure.
Ten Hag will soon come to the same conclusion. If van de Injured decides to actually do some work for United, it might be sooner rather than later but we won't win diddly squat with this guy.
States the poster of the world's most insightless reply.What a dumb post
I would have kept the ball playing that crowd , he needs to do more than keep the ball against a Sunday morning team.Thought he was really good, worked his ass off, kept the ball.
This is deliciously ironic. Posts an absolute turd of a post with no justification or any sort of relevancy to the thread and complains there's no essays in response. Maybe if you posted anything above elementary school level, you might get a similar reply.States the poster of the world's most insightless reply.