horsechoker
The Caf's Ezza.
We may not win the league with him but we're more likely to get top 4 with him
We may not win the league with him but we're more likely to get top 4 with him
No point discussing titles until we can beat teams like Villa away from home.I don't think anyone disagrees with that.
He completely changes the dynamic of how we play, because he brings a consistent energy and ability to press high that seemingly none of our other players are capable of doing. People accuse of him of being erratic and loose, which is true in part, but we were massively erratic yesterday anyway with our spam crossing of hopeful/hopeless balls into Ronaldo's vague vicinity. We need him.
Bruno has become a scapegoat of sorts, he's definitely a victim of his early unsustainable success. We need to not start Ronaldo, basically, because Bruno also defaults to spamming balls into him. Regardless of what they do in training, or how we set the team up, Ronaldo is such an historical unprecedented goal getter that he inhibits any playstyle that doesn't revolve around getting the ball into him as quickly as possible, regardless of the angle.Apparently a few weeks ago it was his fault for us spamming crosses to Ronaldo.
What we missed is his leadership. One thing he actually does is regardless of how well he is playing, we know he will created 1/2 chances each game. Thats what we lacked.
Bruno has become a scapegoat of sorts, he's definitely a victim of his early unsustainable success. We need to not start Ronaldo, basically, because Bruno also defaults to spamming balls into him. Regardless of what they do in training, or how we set the team up, Ronaldo is such an historical unprecedented goal getter that he inhibits any playstyle that doesn't revolve around getting the ball into him as quickly as possible, regardless of the angle.
On the second paragraph, wholeheartedly agree. He's got a relentless, unwavering desire and belief to get a goal and push onwards that is pretty unique. ten Hag massively dropped the ball by thinking de Beek was a logical replacement. It had to be Fred or McTominay just to make up for the intensity we lost through not having Bruno. de Beek is the antithesis of Bruno in basically every way.
Yep, its weird to see how the fans have turned on him, its also to do with the twitter lords posting videos of his misplaced passes.
We clearly lacked that fighting spirit in the game yesterday. Ten Hag dropped the ball, I agree but alot of fans actually called for this, I had a look on twitter and all I saw was people saying how great it is to see Donny in that role.
I have seen so many people call for Bruno to be dropped for Donny in the 10. I do not think Donny possess any qualities that work for our team, he is a player that you use when you are up and want to keep possession of the ball because he is only really good at passing it back from where the ball comes from.
Hes a chance creating machine with an incredible engine. We can definitely win the league with him in the team.
Basically showing why this thread is completely spot on.
Weak footballer who will never be good enough for more than a fight for the top 4.
Only turning up to get in the World Cup squad.Question is, Would you bring James Maddison in to replace him?
This, what was Eriksen doing?Eriksen and Malacia are more to blame there. It was a shite ball, and Malacia didn't make himself available when Bruno was clearly in a difficult position
NoQuestion is, Would you bring James Maddison in to replace him?
More reasonable, yeah. Regardless of peoples' frustrations there is absolutely no chance that Maddison is a clear upgrade. But as competition al a Malacia to Shaw, he would be good.compete with him?
compete with him?
We need to be moving away from these specialised 10s. Good teams generally don't play them for a reason. You sacrifice too much in the build up