Mciahel Goodman
Worst Werewolf Player of All Times
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
- Messages
- 30,004
Wow.Notice he used the term "Football Legend" and not Man Utd Legend? There's a reason for that
Wow.Notice he used the term "Football Legend" and not Man Utd Legend? There's a reason for that
My main question is, so what? Do you want people to say 'You have opened my eyes - Bobby Charlton must have been terrible too', or 'Actually, I revise my opinion - in spite of what I have seen with my own eyes to the contrary I now don't think Rooney has been terrible for the final third of his career'? (BTW, terrible wasn't a word used by me and I personally wouldn't go that far in describing Rooney's form over the past few years). What is it that you are trying to prove?
Aside from all of that - unless you've watched both of their careers (maybe you have - in which case, fair play old-timer ;-)) then really when it comes to Bobby C you're just going on documentary evidence rather than something that you have actually seen, which again makes it a strange comparison imho.
With regard to your final paragraph - no, the two things are only mutually inclusive in your head, you have just conflated them for the sake of trying to prove a fairly flaky point.
Well no, of course Rooney isn't alone on this front, I am sure many legends if indulged would end up doing the same, and I am sure someone like Ronaldo at Madrid would end up doing the same if given free reign, or Messi at Barca.. but in general, even the all time greats, are usually prevented from taking it too far. Maybe one or two seasons past their peak, over the hill ala Ronaldinho from 06-08).. but it is very rare to see a player dominate the landscape at a club which isn't even his home side (like Totti at Roma) and at a club with such a ferocious appetite for success, managing to worm his way into staying at a club for 5 years past his peak and no doubt not living the right lifestyle of a professional footballer.
Also just as rare to see the national team of a big nation so manipulated by one star clearly past their prime and clearly more of a hindrance than an asset. It was almost like a mafia 'Godfather' like plot to ensure Wayne Rooney ensures elite level legendary status, so that all vested parties could get a return on their investment.
Would be happy to referred to comparable examples.
He's quite clearly a United legend. All time record goal scorer, all time record European goal scorer. Won everything there is to win, and stayed with the club for over a decade (from teenager to 30+).
It's beyond mental to try and claim he isn't a United legend. Why? Contract negotiations? Most players do or have done that, many whom we class as legends without thinking (Keane for example). As the agent becomes more important as time goes on, Rooney's contract situation will seem quaint in retrospect.
Not taking anything away from his achievements but to be honest, he wouldn't have got a better package at any other club. We were always his best option.
He spent most of his United career under our greatest ever manager, Sir Alex, was playing during a time where we were winning almost everything, managed to play at a club which were was a stones throw from where he grew up and had the luxury of us being able to pay him the best wages.
What were his other options? Go abroad? I always felt Rooney wasn't the type who could settle abroad and he knew that, so that was never really an option. In the end its more a case of, we were the best option available to him rather than him staying because he loved United. He would have gone if the other options were better. Not a club legend for me.
I've only seen a limited amount of Charlton* but what I can say with a great deal of confidence is he was a significantly better player than Rooney, much more deserving of his legendary status, and on the whole his career was significantly more noteworthy. I'm not trying to equate the two. However to avoid looking at the obvious parallels which are grounded in fact, and the contrasting perceptions, strikes me as a very odd form of ignorance. There's nothing subjective there to be arguing about.
Rio Ferdinand has just tweeted this;
Notice he used the term "Football Legend" and not Man Utd Legend? There's a reason for that
He apologized to his teammates for indirectly disparaging the quality of the squad in the statement he released did he not? No ones denying he released a statement questioning the clubs ambition.
Also i wouldn't have put it past Rooney's agent or his advisors to have stirred some shit in the media, but it's a fact that Ferguson broke the news not Rooney, many people seem to have come to thinking that Rooney woke up one morning and decided to tell the world he wants to leave United in a public statement. And no one can provide a scrap of evidence there was anything in the City links beyond a throwaway line by a journalist in an article with the old ''has told teammates he would be willing to go to City''. And yet people still believe it as fact that Rooney wanted to go to City or at least ''threatened'' to.
I've said it before i am convinced a lot of the resentment towards Rooney is based on tabloid nonsense and ignorance of what actually happened during his contract sagas.
Thank feck. Noisy and clueless.Indeed, when i seen this poll i had an idea the majority would vote yes. But i am surprised just how overwhelmingly one sided it is to be honest.
You're right it seems like a vocal minority popping up in every thread have made their numbers seem greater than they actually are.
Ya, there is. Rio wants to convey that his legendary status is not limited to Man Utd, but he is an All Time Football legend. Just wants to emphasis that he is much more than a club legend.Rio Ferdinand has just tweeted this;
Notice he used the term "Football Legend" and not Man Utd Legend? There's a reason for that
Some of my favourite less remembered Rooney goals:
Ya, there is. Rio wants to convey that his legendary status is not limited to Man Utd, but he is an All Time Football legend. Just wants to emphasis that he is much more than a club legend.
Some of my favourite less remembered Rooney goals:
In that terrible third he scored an average of 10 league goals a season, 25%+ more than any other player at the time and a perfectly respectable record if you look through our club's scoring history or at many great goalscorer's records outside of their peak. At least 2 of those goals were among the most iconic goals in our club's long history. In that period our top 3 scorers are...
He was the only player to score more than 30 goals in that period when we played terrible football, in weak squads, and going through significant changes on and off the field. The fact the rest of the team was so poor is a significant caveat to his own poor performances. Think that's being too generous to Rooney? Let's have a look at Bobby Charlton's last 4 seasons at the club...
- Rooney - 40 goals
- Mata - 29 goals
- van Persie - 22 goals
Should that be held against him? I don't think so. Is it? Nope. So why do we apply different standards to the only player in United's history to outscore him? The comparison is incredibly relevant in terms of the context that decline in individual performances took place in, yet for some reason no-one gives it a 2nd thought...
- Productivity - 31 goals in 158 league games
- Success - Finished as low as 18th and as high as 8th, following a period of turmoil driven by managerial change*
*In Busby's penultimate year we won the European Cup and finished 2nd in the league, in his final year we narrowly lost out on reaching a 2nd European Cup final in a row but finished 11th in the league, then the spiral began with Charlton as an essential part of the team
Not for me, I know very well what happened - the statement he put out alone was enough for me to put him firmly in the 'not a legend' category.
Not for me, I know very well what happened - the statement he put out alone was enough for me to put him firmly in the 'not a legend' category.
There's a reason Rio didn't call him a United legend. Which he is easily could of considering this topic is being discussed everywhere. It's because he knows Rooneys loyalties are with Everton and although he is a footballing legend, it would be inappropriate to call him a United one. Rio was always on point and still is.
I don't think you understand what my point was.
Ditto, I never felt he really was a Man United legend. As I read somewhere else, we were just the best destination for him in England, as he was never likely to move abroad or be satisfied with less successful clubs like Arsenal or Chelsea (when we first signed him)
What I do disagree with is the characterisation of that part of his career as terrible, for the reasons mentioned already. Surely you can see that if you were to call Rooney's last few seasons terrible then you'd have to apply the same description to many of our greatest ever players...which sounds silly because it is silly.