K2K
Full Member
They can see it with their own eyes too.They do. I know that for a fact.
/ITK
But they do.
They can see it with their own eyes too.They do. I know that for a fact.
/ITK
But they do.
He lost the anger and fire after he did the metatarsal at Chelsea in 2006 to be fair.
Never been the same player since.
Yeah, that's the part I'm mainly referring to. Which is bollocks.lol, apart from the initial bit about the Arsenal game being his best performance in 2 years, I'd agree with Rozay. He deserved a 5 out 10 and yes, as extreme as it is, I would actually wish him injury to get him out of the team. It'd be better for the team, the manager and arguably the good for him too. Some time out whatever the circumstance will be good (in an idealistic world).
Out of both qualification matches due to ankle injury.
Seeing the egos of Gerrard and Terry and the trouble they can cause when they're no longer the player they were, I have really no hope that Rooney is going to change that trend and I'm not looking forward to this.
Looking forward to the 'needs a few games under his belt to get in form again after an injury layoff'.
That's partially true, but he's been a great player after that injury also. He was sensational for us up until that injury. Never been one to hype the England NT but they would have gone for with a Rooney in the pre-injury form. He was our main bright light during our barren spell between 2004 and 2006. Hard to pick a favourite moment from that period, but I'll always remember his assist with the outside of his foot to C.Ronaldo during a 4-1 win against Bolton. That was pure genius.
It's not LVG's patience I'm questioning anymore. It's his sanity and sense.
Well there is criticism and I criticize him as well, but people on here go way over the top unecessarily and just revert to saying it's a shit performance even if he puts in a decent one these days. The majority on here just don't like him, or at least that's what it feels like.
Well, the football pundits all seem to agree that Rooney is the best striker in England and must play for club and country.
There are many fans on here, who believe that is definitely one of our best players.
So not everybody shares your view.
I, however, do share your view.
you are talking of aggression. He still has that. He is just devoid of confidence. This is where Fergie was so good in helping players.
Well, the football pundits all seem to agree that Rooney is the best striker in England and must play for club and country.
There are many fans on here, who believe that is definitely one of our best players.
So not everybody shares your view.
I, however, do share your view.
I suspect notwithstanding his somewhat less than impressive club performances, that Rooney will continue to be Hodgson's first choice as striker.
Whether he deserves that uncritical privilege remains to be seen.
Of course he deserves to be England's striker, he's the only player who scores consistently for them. Since Hodgson took over Rooney has scored 22 goals for England, next is Welbeck on 13, then Lampard on 6. However shitty he is in the build-up play, he sticks the ball in the back of the next far more often than anybody else, and that's a pretty important part of football.
England games (and goal scorers).
vs Estonia, Walcott, Sterling
vs Switzerland, Kane, Rooney (pen)
vs San Marino, Rooney (pen), Brolli (og), Barkley, Walcott 2, Kane
vs Slovenia , Wilshere 2, Rooney
vs R. of Ireland, no goals
vs Italy, Townsend
vs Lithuania, Rooney Welbeck Sterling Kane
So in the last 7 games,
Rooney has scored: 2 penalties, 2 in open play
Walcott: 3 in open play
Kane: 3 in open play
Based on the above, his international goal scoring form is as good as any of his English peers.
Lets take a look at his league form:
(name: goal count)
Vardy: 7
Aguero: 6
6 players: 5
...
Rooney: 1
Based on the above, his EPL goal scoring form is terrible.
England games (and goal scorers).
vs Estonia, Walcott, Sterling
vs Switzerland, Kane, Rooney (pen)
vs San Marino, Rooney (pen), Brolli (og), Barkley, Walcott 2, Kane
vs Slovenia , Wilshere 2, Rooney
vs R. of Ireland, no goals
vs Italy, Townsend
vs Lithuania, Rooney Welbeck Sterling Kane
So in the last 7 games,
Rooney has scored: 2 penalties, 2 in open play
Walcott: 3 in open play
Kane: 3 in open play
Based on the above, his international goal scoring form is as good as any of his English peers.
Lets take a look at his league form:
(name: goal count)
Vardy: 7
Aguero: 6
6 players: 5
...
Rooney: 1
Based on the above, his EPL goal scoring form is terrible.
he'll be fit for Everton, no doubt about that. Even if 80% fit he plays. when Moyes played Bayern in the away leg he stayed on for 90 mins when he couldn't even kick the ballRooney needs to play his way back into the team now. We can't keep handing him starts in the expectation he'll come good after a run of a few games, because his body is at the point where it can't handle that any more. He needs to rediscover his sharpness in training. If, somehow, he's fit for the Everton game he can come on as a sub for that. And if he makes a positive impact then he can earn himself a spot against City. Otherwise not.
he'll be fit for Everton, no doubt about that. Even if 80% fit he plays. when Moyes played Bayern in the away leg he stayed on for 90 mins when he couldn't even kick the ball
Oh really. And how many of those goals have actually been scored in a major tournament?
Of the 3 goals scored by England at tournaments under Hodgson when Rooney has been playing, he has scored 2 and assisted 1.
Are you counting qualifies? Because I'm not.
No I'm counting WC14 and Euro 12. Although Rooney was our top scorer in both of those qualification's, and this one, and in fact every qualifying we've had since the last time we failed to qualify.
My point is though, the fact that he's scored most of his goals against cannon fodder teams shouldn't be discounted.
Of course he has, but that's true of all players simply because it's easier to score against poorer teams. The truth of the matter is that we've been poor for the best part of a decade now and have been completely outplayed by every good team we've come up against in tournaments during that time so expecting him to have some sort of stellar record would be ludicrous. It's not as if we have other options banging down the door either, Sturridge is a crock, Welbeck is injured, Kane can't buy a goal for Spurs and Walcott is only scoring against the same cannon-fodder that Rooney is being derided for scoring against. Rooney may be in decline but he's still the most likely player to knock in a few goals for us next summer imo. After that we should look ahead, but a major tournament is not the time to take a gamble when we have a solid, if unspectacular goalscorer already in the team.
For whom? You've made him unsaleable by now.I think he'll leave United after the Euros.
For whom? You've made him unsaleable by now.
No way they'd come close to his wages. You'd be stuck paying 70% of them.Everton
For whom? You've made him unsaleable by now.
No way they'd come close to his wages. You'd be stuck paying 70% of them.
he'll be fit for Everton, no doubt about that. Even if 80% fit he plays. when Moyes played Bayern in the away leg he stayed on for 90 mins when he couldn't even kick the ball
Your logic is sound apart from the fact there isnt a snowballs chance in hell we get £20 million for him.It's not always that simple.
Some players receive a part of their contract as a severance package (aka a loyalty bonus) when they are sold while others forfeit it to force a move (which is generally beneficial to the player anyway).
If we received £20m from Everton for Rooney, we might need to give Rooney £18m of that as a contract payment meaning we'd only get £2m, so where is the benefit?
The benefit is that he's off the books and paid up using external money.
So while we don't benefit from much of a transfer fee, we have used the money to tie up his contract and can offer it elsewhere.
That scenario beats having him here stinking out the place for 3 more years and paying him for the privalige.
So if Rooney had 3 years left at £200k a week (£10.4m a year, £31.2m total) and we agreed to receive £20m from Everton for him and agreed an £18m loyalty package with Rooney, rather than being £31.2m down in 3 years, we'd be £2m up meaning we'd be £33.2m better off than had we not sold him.
That way Rooney gets £18m+Everton contract and he's no worse off either.
Everyone benefits in one way or another, none of this "paying 70% of his wages" business.
It's not an ideal situation, you'd rather profit from selling such a high profile player but that's what you get for offering a 28 year old such a long massive contract when there is a good chance he will decline hugely before its up. Cheers Moyseh.