Wayne Rooney | 2012-14 Performances

Status
Not open for further replies.
And if you even attended school, you would know that comparing slavery with modern day football is pretty terrible. I guess you're trying to get off on a technicality though, so I guess I'll just shut my trap.
still cant understand what " looks a bit like" means huh?.
 
What I was trying to get at was that surely Rooney has some say in this. I think if we dont have to sell Rooney to Chelsea we dont have to and he can either hang out on the training pitch for the remainder of his contract or play if he shows the right form and attitude.
The tricky bit to me is that if a player is unhappy in his situation is it right to hold them beyond a reasonable amount of time?

I'd say morally speaking - no. It makes little sense to keep a player on your books against his wishes from a more pragmatic viewpoint too. But there are exceptions. Because his wishes may be perfectly indecent (see Heinze). Then there's only two options: Sell him to a more suitable buyer or force him to see out his contract. The latter is an undesirable situation, obviously, but when it's caused by the player's own lack of decency - well, so be it.
 
I'm not saying Fergie lied. My guess is that his interpretation of what Rooney said was as he said in the interview. And his perception was quite possibly skewed, or he was unwilling to give him the benefit of the doubt, on the basis of 'once bitten, twice shy'.


Reading what you wrote, you say that Ferguson did not tell the truth, and thus did not tell us what Rooney had actually said. Again the questions beckons, what could possibly Ferguson and/or United benefit from saying that Rooney requested a transfer? You did write that personally you didn't think he handed in a transfer. How is that not saying Fergie lied, or fabricated the story?
 
And if you even attended school, you would know that comparing slavery with modern day football is pretty terrible. I guess you're trying to get off on a technicality though, so I guess I'll just shut my trap.


Indeed - comparing football with slavery is just mean, really, thinking back and knowing what slaves had to go through. You may in some ways compare it to human trafficking, but on no level should you compare it to slavery.
 
Perez said Ronaldo was been treated like a slave when we kept him for that extra year! Brownie points if anyone can find a video of fergies reaction to that :lol:
Which is quite a bit different to the phrase I used but then some on here cant work that out.
 
Indeed - comparing football with slavery is just mean, really, thinking back and knowing what slaves had to go through. You may in some ways compare it to human trafficking, but on no level should you compare it to slavery.
feck me, firstly I used the term " looks a bit like" Are you lot all so PC that you cant understand there is quite a difference between saying something is like slavery and saying something LOOKS a BIT like slavery. Jesus H Christ. harden the feck up.
 
Rooney had weeks to fix any rift and clear the air over a simple misunderstanding, if this had been attempted i am certain that we would have heard word of it. Moreover he has not said that he wants to stay at United nor denied having asked to leave.

For a player who has to prove to the club that he is worth their continued loyalty and support, attempting to throw Sir Alex under the bus as a means of redemption doesn't strike me as entirely rational.
 
So what about my sun/lemon-thing compared to your slavery/footballplayer signing a contract earning him millions of pounds every year? Whats the difference?
 
Perez said Ronaldo was been treated like a slave when we kept him for that extra year! Brownie points if anyone can find a video of fergies reaction to that :lol:

Edit: maybe it was blatter that said it


Blatter:

Brownie points:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...IFA-chief-Blatter-Ronaldo-slavery-claims.html
It was an unfortunate statement from someone in such a position as Sepp Blatter," Ferguson told a pre-match press conference. "Slavery was abolished many years ago.
"These days footballers can earn five or six million pounds a year. I do not want to dignify this kind of statement with a response but when you consider the history of slavery, it was a very unfortunate statement."


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1039068/United-boss-Ferguson-hits-FIFA-chief-Blatter-Ronaldo-slavery-claims.html#ixzz2Y1XmwS1W
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
feck me, firstly I used the term " looks a bit like" Are you lot all so PC that you cant understand there is quite a difference between saying something is like slavery and saying something LOOKS a BIT like slavery. Jesus H Christ. harden the feck up.


I think we just all agree that the comparison, vague or not, should not have been made.
 
Blatter:

Brownie points:


It was an unfortunate statement from someone in such a position as Sepp Blatter," Ferguson told a pre-match press conference. "Slavery was abolished many years ago.
"These days footballers can earn five or six million pounds a year. I do not want to dignify this kind of statement with a response but when you consider the history of slavery, it was a very unfortunate statement."


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1039068/United-boss-Ferguson-hits-FIFA-chief-Blatter-Ronaldo-slavery-claims.html#ixzz2Y1XmwS1W
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


Did he not say something along the lines of ''did they tell Franco that''??

Im searching Youtube but cant find it, i know i seen it before
 
So what about my sun/lemon-thing compared to your slavery/footballplayer signing a contract earning him millions of pounds every year? Whats the difference?
I dont see any problem with saying the sun "looks a bit like" a lemon. You just dont understand what " looks a bit like" means do you. you do know what "bit" means dont you?
 
Reading what you wrote, you say that Ferguson did not tell the truth, and thus did not tell us what Rooney had actually said. Again the questions beckons, what could possibly Ferguson and/or United benefit from saying that Rooney requested a transfer? You did write that personally you didn't think he handed in a transfer. How is that not saying Fergie lied, or fabricated the story?


No, I didn't say that. Nor do I think it reads as such. It's not nearly as black and white as you want it to be. It's not a case of me believing one over the other.

My opinion is that Fergie stated what he believed to be the case honestly. He didn't say the exact words Rooney used. I don't find it hard to believe that Rooney could say something, whether through frustration or otherwise, which led Fergie to believe he wanted to leave the club. I also believe that Rooney didn't leave the meeting thinking that he'd asked to leave the club. In my mind, particularly when Rooney isn't the most articulate person in the world, the two aren't mutually exclusive.
 
And he hit back by dredging up Real's links with Spain's former fascist dictator, who made sure his favourite team benefited at the expense of their rivals.
"You get used to this, Madrid's behaviour on these things," said the angry Manchester United boss. "I read about Calderon making the great statement that slavery was abolished many, many years ago.
"Well, did they tell Franco that? Jesus Christ! Eh, give me a break!



:lol: Brilliant! god i miss him :(





Rossa you get brownie points for effort :D
 
I dont see any problem with saying the sun "looks a bit like" a lemon. You just dont understand what " looks a bit like" means do you. you do know what "bit" means dont you?


He takes some things very literally and other things he reads so far between the lines that he reads things that even the author didn't know were there.
 
No, I didn't say that. Nor do I think it reads as such. It's not nearly as black and white as you want it to be. It's not a case of me believing one over the other.

My opinion is that Fergie stated what he believed to be the case honestly. He didn't say the exact words Rooney used. I don't find it hard to believe that Rooney could say something, whether through frustration or otherwise, which led Fergie to believe he wanted to leave the club. I also believe that Rooney didn't leave the meeting thinking that he'd asked to leave the club. In my mind, particularly when Rooney isn't the most articulate person in the world, the two aren't mutually exclusive.


OK, then it's different. From the post I quoted though, it clearly sounded like you said that Ferguson lied or constructed a "false" story. I personally doubt that Fergie would take a frustrated Rooney quote as evidence to Rooney leaving. He knows how much stick the fans would give him for that, and possibly never forgive, seeing it's the second request. Subsequently, I see no reason for Ferguson saying it unless Rooney blatantly said it, or handed in a written request.
 
And he hit back by dredging up Real's links with Spain's former fascist dictator, who made sure his favourite team benefited at the expense of their rivals.
"You get used to this, Madrid's behaviour on these things," said the angry Manchester United boss. "I read about Calderon making the great statement that slavery was abolished many, many years ago.
"Well, did they tell Franco that? Jesus Christ! Eh, give me a break!



:lol: Brilliant! god i miss him :(





Rossa you get brownie points for effort :D


That is brilliant! :lol:

Thanks, mate:D
 
Blatter:

Brownie points:


It was an unfortunate statement from someone in such a position as Sepp Blatter," Ferguson told a pre-match press conference. "Slavery was abolished many years ago.
"These days footballers can earn five or six million pounds a year. I do not want to dignify this kind of statement with a response but when you consider the history of slavery, it was a very unfortunate statement."


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1039068/United-boss-Ferguson-hits-FIFA-chief-Blatter-Ronaldo-slavery-claims.html#ixzz2Y1XmwS1W
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook


"If the player wants to play somewhere else, then a solution should be found because if he stays in a club where he does not feel comfortable to play then it's not good for the player and for the club.

'I'm always in favour of protecting the player and if the player, he wants to leave, let him leave."


I think in football there's too much modern slavery in transferring players or buying players here and there, and putting them somewhere,' he continued.

'We are trying now to intervene in such cases. The reaction to the Bosman law is to make long-lasting contacts in order to keep the players and then if he wants to leave, then there is only one solution, he has to pay his contract."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...r-wades-Ronaldo-row-slavery-swipe-United.html
 
Rooney had weeks to fix any rift and clear the air over a simple misunderstanding, if this had been attempted i am certain that we would have heard word of it. Moreover he has not said that he wants to stay at United nor denied having asked to leave.

For a player who has to prove to the club that he is worth their continued loyalty and support, attempting to throw Sir Alex under the bus as a means of redemption doesn't strike me as entirely rational.


Possibly all these things ('demanding' an apology; 'refusing' to take a pay-cut etc) are part of a plan ensuring that United will very much want to sell him?
 
That people are seriously taking Rooney's word before that of Sir Alex is utterly beyond me. You really should go and take a hard look in the mirror and see if that jersey has Adidas stripes or a Nike logo on it and report back. No way would Sir Alex lie about such a thing - why would he? It was in his best interest to leave the club in as good a state as he could as that reflects directly back to his leadership.


I would believe it's a PR-stunt by Rooney's magnificent agent, who is known for his antics. That people are actually and truthfully debating whether Rooney or Ferguson is lying is a joke! Too much Rooney love here for a person who has shown time and time that he has no more love for the club than the paycheck goes.
:wenger:

In case you haven't realised that you've interpreted my point in completely the wrong way, here's some previous posts to highlight my views:
You're giving other people grief for their polarisation of the issue but your suggestion that we're "taking Rooney's word over Fergie's" only serves to do the same. You can believe Sir Alex stretched the truth without thinking Rooney did no wrong. Rooney was the one who made the transfer request last time which now means people will believe he's done the same again much more readily. Likewise if Rooney was in tip-top shape and top form all the time then people would be less willing to cut off all ties with him.
Sir Alex has had fallouts with lots of his players and has never hesitated to put all the blame on them, which the players of course have all denied. I'm surprised people think it's somehow disrespectful to Sir Alex to believe he doesn't always tell the whole truth.
I'm not taking Rooney's side. I think it's hilarious that people are even taking sides, truth be told. I have no love for Rooney. I simply think he's obviously a much better player than many here are letting on and we'd be fools to get rid of him unless he forces himself out. I feel absolutely no inclination to defend Rooney the person principally because I don't think judging these people based on these little snippets you get from the media is wise. Look how easy it was for people to say Giggs is a man of real class and an international role model until they got another little snippet of information and now he's a sleazy, dishonest little man. Scholesy's now seemingly the only squeaky clean player people can think of but then he's only seen that way because he keeps his personal life so private. It doesn't mean he's this honest, decent, honourable man, it just means he keeps to himself. Deciding which of these players are likeable based on so little information is a bit silly, really. As is judging them by how they treat the club for the most part. The majority of our big-name players have disrespected the club in various ways for their own personal gains. That's how football is. For some reason people feel the need to vilify certain players for widespread issues. For example it seems to me that Steve basically hates Rooney, and that's primarily because he particularly hates agents (and their influence in the background in the media). It's not something that's limited to Rooney but he's an easy figure to direct that hate at. I find that quite strange. People hate various things about this game that they love and because they can't actually do anything to combat these issues they decide to direct that hate at some person they don't know. Weird.


I haven't defended Rooney in any way. At the very least he acted like a bit of a prima donna when he finally got dropped on a couple of occasions (for his own "inconsistent" form). I think there's a fair chance he/Stretford also wanted to try and push the boat out for one last bumper contract too. Knowing how the biggest earners at our clubs are usually those who have been here for 7+ years and are in their late 20s I don't think it's that big a stretch to believe he decided to make another play to get some more cash. Maybe he found out van Persie got a wage that came close to his despite not having earned that through loyalty and it made him get even more greedy. Who knows. Me thinking that doesn't make him a despicable cnut is not the same as defending him. It's just accepting that the bizarre football/"celebrity" world he's a part of tends to do that to so many people. It doesn't mean he's blameless, it's just not something I feel is worth getting upset about. It is what it is. If I genuinely found myself getting angry about some footballer wanting to add a few more million to his bank account then I'd simply stop watching the game. Greed and lack of respect for your employers are hardly the biggest sins that exist throughout the game. Likewise when I say I think Sir Alex stretched the truth it's not me taking Rooney's (or RvN's or Keane's or Beckham's) side or disrespecting him in any way, it's not possible to be so successful in a world that's under so much scrutiny and a drama-thirsty media (and audience) without doing so consistently. It's not something specific to this "battle" with Rooney, it's just how I think he manages difficult situations with star players in general. It's not an attempt to excuse Rooney.

That's why this thread is so terrible. There's so many agendas going on and every single person is reading things how they want to read them rather than trying to understand what the other person is saying. And then any piece of non-information is dissected by the anti-Rooney fans as being yet another attempt by the Rooney camp to cover his arse and drag the club through the mud and then everyone on the opposite side jump to his defence and actually try to defend Rooney's actions which quite likely only existed in the writer's imagination for all of five minutes. It's basically a bunch of people taking different sides based on no information at all, and then repeating the same points over and over andn over again to remind people of their views on Rooney. It makes for awful "discussion".
 
People hate various things about this game that they love and because they can't actually do anything to combat these issues they decide to direct that hate at some person they don't know. Weird.


The 'love of the club' and the 'fandom' that comes from supporting United has become this weird vicarious 'I want to feel like I control everything, what I hate becomes what the club should hate'.

I think it's a bit weird as well.
 
Well, first I would say that he's not past it yet. He could go on to have many fine seasons yet - but, again, I think that depends on whether he stays with us.

Secondly, I'd say he hasn't lived up to the enormous expectations people had when he first came into the limelight as a teenager. I remember thinking we had signed a latter-day Charlton when he arrived from Everton. He hasn't turned out quite as spectacular, that's a fact.

Thirdly, whether he has lived up to his potential (rather than people's expectations) is hard to tell. As I've said before in this thread I've come to regard him as a bit of an oddball - as a player. Someone who doesn't quite fit any category, perhaps. And in many ways I think he has always been such a player. The enormous, raw talent that some say he has - at least partially wasted - probably wasn't quite there to begin with. And by that I don't mean to imply he lacked raw talent - just that he didn't possess it to the same extent as a Best, Maradona or Messi. He didn't have that genius-like effortlessness to his game that such players seem to come with.

In terms of living up to his talent I'd say, then, that he is there or thereabouts. But the main thing is - and this is why I don't want him gone - I actually think he hasn't played out his register yet. I think he can become an even better player; that he can become more consistent, more focused, finally shed that last layer of immaturity which hampers his game a little too often.

And if that happens at some other club - well, then I'd call that a fecking waste. For us.


I would agree with that don't count your chickens, I think the results of these 'talks' may decide how Rooney finishes his career. I'm assuming every manager who is interested in signing him sees him the same way you do, that many great days may still be ahead as he enters what is meant to be his peak. I agree that perhaps raw talent wise he may not have been up there with the Messi's, Maradona's and Best's but for me he had enough that when discussing the game's best players he should be in that conversation with Ronaldo and Messi. For me in that regard he has failed. I don't think it is a question of what he can produced because when he has been at his best he has looked like one of the world's very best but it has been how consistently he has done it.

I would not want to let him go either I agree that he can go back to being one of Europe's very best but that is only if he wants it and if he does hopefully it is with us. A half arsed Rooney which some say we have had this season has still been an important part of our title wining campaign. That says it all in regards to the talent he possesses.
 
Possibly all these things ('demanding' an apology; 'refusing' to take a pay-cut etc) are part of a plan ensuring that United will very much want to sell him?

You never know.

Like a type of sea life which makes its digestion so unbearable that a predator vomits it back up again, or something.

Or Rooney when in cahoots with Stretford is but a scorpion:
A scorpion was walking along the bank of a river, wondering how to get to the other side. Suddenly, he saw a fox. He asked the fox to take him on his back across the river.

The fox said, "No. If I do that, you'll sting me, and I'll drown."

The scorpion assured him, "If I do that, we'll both drown."

The fox thought about it and finally agreed. So the scorpion climbed up on his back, and the fox began to swim. But halfway across the river, the scorpion stung him. As poison filled his veins, the fox turned to the scorpion and said, "Why did you do that? Now you'll drown, too."

"I couldn't help it," said the scorpion. "It's my nature."

Fortunately United is a wily old fox and knows what best to do.
 
it seems to me that Steve basically hates Rooney, and that's primarily because he particularly hates agents (and their influence in the background in the media).

Sorry, mate, but you're mistaken in this. I've made my position clear several times in this thread - I'd like nothing better than to believe that Wayne will rediscover his zest and his passion for United. I don't believe that will happen though, hence my disappointment with Rooney (whch, true enough, now makes me wish he would leave). I do dislike what I've read about Rooney's agent over the years, and don't care much for agents generally. However, my supposed hatred for Rooney would've been obvious to all throughout the years I've been on the Caf if this had been so; it simply isn't the case though, sorry - if it was, I wouldn't hesitate to make my position clear to all.
 
He can go Arsenal. We owe them a favour. If we get someone like Bale or the great R, then he can go where the hell he wants. Wouldn't make a difference to us.
 
Has there ever been a more polarizing player at the club than Mister Rooney ?
 
I wouldn't use Rooney as an example of the typical English football player. I'd bet nearly all English internationals look after themselves very well.

Well, according to Mick Clegg, "99%" of players he's worked with are like Wayne Rooney. Something he was so sure about he felt he needed to make a point of pointing this out, in order to stop Rooney being singled out as not being typical.

I'm not convinced English/British players look after themselves that well. They often visibly tire in games while their foreign counter parts seem noticably less likely to. Most obvious recent example being the England vs Italy game at the Euros last year. I mean, Italy were better anyway, but they were also from about 60 minutes onwards, quite visibly more fit.

There are probably some cultural differences when it comes to this sort of thing, but at top clubs - whether they be English or Spanish - the standard must be very, very high. In other words, not keeping fully fit will not be tolerated (might even be a breach of contract at some level, I don't know much about the sheer legal aspect of it).

So, when Ronaldo stood out it was probably more a case of him being exceptionally dedicated - not that Rooney was a slacker in any normal sense of the word. The latter being pretty much what the "clarification" stated, unless I'm mistaken. Everyone says Ronaldo is obsessed with keeping fit and trains uncommonly hard - which no doubt partly explains his quality as a player. Most great athletes, regardless of sport, are perfectionists who train that extra bit harder than everybody else.

I'm sure Rooney would've benefited from emulating Ronaldo's regime - but that's necessarily a criticism which could be directed at just about every player on the planet, bar Ronaldo himself.

Ronaldo is a bit of a freak in terms of dedication. I mean, you can ask people to live on a diet of orange juice and fish if you want, but you'll never, ever get most of them to do it. He's not a bar you can realisticaly expect most people to reach for.

There is a scale though, and I genuinely think English players or players brought up in England are more succeptable to be further down it than foreign based counter parts. It's just a theory rather than anything I can really back up other than by comparing on the pitch performances, but there are some things about English teams that amaze me a bit.

Clubs do moniter performance and fitness. We know this...but when it comes to not tolerating it. To what level do they not tolerate? How do you explain Carlos Tevez for example? His frankly obvious lack of getting into shape has been tolerated over a period of years at both of the top two clubs in England. City clinged to him likea trophy. Di Canio took over at Sunderland and found players simply weren't fit, and would sometimes just go home and turn their phones off because they couldn't be arsed. Anderson has been tolerated by Manchester United for over 5 years...he's often literally not fit enough to complete a game of football. How long do you suppose the Barcelona side of 2008-2012 would put up with having a fatso in their team who knackered themselves out 60 minutes into every game? Or players who just couldn't be bothered to keep themselves in top condition? They got rid of Ronaldinho for this reason. Ronaldinho, for feck sake. Not Anderson or John O'Shea...an actual world class player shown the door because of what, according to a former United coach, is apparently typical to an extent of 99% of players based here.

It's worth a thought at least I reckon. Probably less of a thought and more of a serious comparison and looking into if I was in charge of the future of home grown football.
 
Take noodles post, then think about Giggs. It's worth saying - keeping fit is fecking important.
 
Rooney will be bigger than Bruce after he retires. I could see Wenger helping him though...he did the same for the Graham back five and got them playing well into their thirties at a consistently high level.

Of course, Rooney isn't coming to Arsenal though.
 
Im just gona throw this into the mix, Cash plus mata???

A straight swap with Mata would be so fecking awesome for us. Mata was a much better player last season, is much younger and in lower wages. We have Kagawa who can take Rooney's place.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.