elmo
Can never have too many Eevees
So if I was that kid I'd just be thankful I avoided Kermit and keep my head down.
Must be saving it for his third one.
So if I was that kid I'd just be thankful I avoided Kermit and keep my head down.
From facebook:
None of the strikers you have mentioned are really a viable option for Chelsea though. Lewandowski is surely off to Munich, Falcao is off to Monaco with this 3rd part ownership issues and Cavani seems far too expensive.
Rooney is the best they can get and he's gotten 15 goals this season after being injured a number of times, being shifted around so RvP can be the main man and with the shit service of Young and Valencia. Rooney behind Mata, OScar and Hazard would be frightening so yes, we better make sure we don't sell to them!
Rooney behind Mata, Oscar and Hazard would be a central midfielder (where he's not very good)... If you mean Rooney in front of them he'd be less prolific than the aforementioned three. Hell with £50m they could get Suarez, who'd command less wages and be equally as prolific.
You keep saying that as if it's a given and a fecking fact. Last season all the 4 mentioned players right up top as center forwards and Rooney had the best goals/games ratio out of all of them.
Actually I keep saying that as if it's an opinion - if you re-read my posts the vast majority state "in my opinion". Rooney isn't a born poacher. He has had a couple of really good seasons where it's all come together, but in terms of consistency he's not a natural number 9, in my opinion.
If you think he's one of the world's best poachers/goalscorers, then fair enough. I however vehemently disagree with this, he's not even in the top 10 in this position in my opinion (as it's not his position).
No, I don't think he's one of the world's best poachers. In fact it would be a waste of his talents playing him that way. I would argue the argument that Chelsea definitely need an out and out poacher and this absurd idea that buying Rooney would weaken their squad when compared to a Falcao. A fully fit and in form Rooney lining up along side the creative talents of Chelsea is far more threatening prospect than Falcao who compared to Rooney is quite a limited player.
This argument is rather pointless as I don't see us selling him to Chelsea anyway
You go on about how limited Falcao is like its a bad thing. They need a goalscorer, something which Falcao has proved to be pretty lethal at.
Something which Rooney was better at last season than Falcao.
Why would I take Falcao when I can get a better all round player who can also bang in the goals when played up top?
Probably because a lot of people don't feel that Rooney could consistently get those returns... One (or 2) swallows don't make a Summer. If he could he'd have established himself as a "number 9" years ago.
I bet if you asked every Chelsea fan, the majority would prefer Hernandez over Rooney... And Hernandez isn't (yet) as good as Falcao.
Kai and now Klay?? Where's he getting these names from?
Congrats Wayne. Now sort your head out.
Maybe he named him after the greatest boxer of all time but didnt spell it correctly.
he seems to like the letter K thats for sure.
So if I was that kid I'd just be thankful I avoided Kermit and keep my head down.
I actually know of a guy called Kermit
Kai is short for Kaiser apparently.
We're going round in circles but a lot of people would say that in the two seasons Rooney has played as a true number 9 he has scored in upwards of 30 goals.
Frankly I would call them idiots and this coming from a self confessed Hernandez fanboy.
Doesn't consistently get good returns? He has 197 goals in 9 years despite not always being played up top. Falcao has a good year or two in leagues where it's far easier to score and people suddenly think the likes of Rooney aren't as good?
I actually know of a guy called Kermit
While he admits to having clear the air talks with Ferguson, as he sought assurances about his future, Rooney remains adamant that no formal transfer request was put in.
That is an official course of action in which the player puts his request in writing and waives his right to a pay-off - and Rooney maintains that has simply never happened, despite United public claims to the contrary.
Just one question (I'm not British): I've seen many derogatory comments under the Daily Mail article regarding Wayne naming his boy Klay. What is wrong with Clay/Klay? Other than being too close to Kai it doesn't sound that unusual to me?
From facebook:
ghaliboy said:it looks as though Roon has had the baby there..
If he's capable of miracles like that, it's no wonder we can't match his ambitions.
It's the bolded that is the issue. The people who are massive Rooney fans suggest he's only ever been our main man for two seasons and scored 35 each time, the fact is he's been the "main man" minimum 4, probably 5 seasons. If that weren't the case then he would be played in that position every season, because a consistent 35 goal a season striker is worth their weight in gold - like Henry, RVN, Shearer or now RVP. Now is anyone truly suggesting Rooney would ever get Van Persie or Van Nistelrooy returns even semi-consistently? I really can't imagine so. Rooney has scored 197 goals in 400 games. That is not the return of a truly prolific goalscorer (despite being a very good return), because Rooney isn't that player. If you believe that he's never been the opportunity then I urge you to look at the reason why.
In the Chelsea team to utilise Rooney best he would be competing for a place in the team with the other player in their team that plays centrally and is responsible for being creative - Mata. If they had £50m to spend on a poacher though they would not be looking to buy a player and play him in his second best position, particularly when there are several quality players out there who are "available".
I just watched a season review video and I hope we can keep Rooney.
Are they fed by Wayne's PR agency? There are no direct quotes and Wayne has never denied the transfer request.