VanGaalEra
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 13,270
Bascombe said a while back that lfc had a kitty of 200mil but wasn't clear if that was gross or net. Time will tell I guess.
What are your sales likely to be?
Bascombe said a while back that lfc had a kitty of 200mil but wasn't clear if that was gross or net. Time will tell I guess.
Hard tackler, fast, fantastic on the ball, knows when to take a risk, can pick out a pass and he's dominant in the air. Not the same but he's the most similar player in the league right now that i can think off.What? He's nothing like Rio.
Anyway, I'm delighted to see them blow most their budget on VVD and Salah.
What are your sales likely to be?
Because I'm not convinced they'll splash out that much more, and there are other holes in their team they need to address.Hard tackler, fast, fantastic on the ball, knows when to take a risk, can pick out a pass and he's dominant in the air. Not the same but he's the most similar player in the league right now that i can think off.
Why would you be happy to see Liverpool add 2 quality players to their squad? the prices are irrelevant if the owners have decided to relax their fists a bit.
Studge 25mil
Moreno 5mil
Stewart 10mil
Lucas free
Origi. 20mil possibly
So you'll need two forwards as well if Sturridge and Origi leave.
How is bluemoon receiving the news?
Van Djik is quality. The same people were laughing at Mane last year. Hes 24 and already one of the best in the league. The 50m spread over 7-8 years will look like a great investment if he lives up to his potential.
Crazy price.
Graeme Kelly saying its a lot less.
Bascombe said a while back that lfc had a kitty of 200mil but wasn't clear if that was gross or net. Time will tell I guess.
Do you really think we'd spend £100m on Salah and Van Dijk if that's the only money we have available? That would be fecking ridiculous.
I know FSG hasn't always been reliable in the past but all the signs point to a figure closer to £200m.
Might as well just get used to the fact that any price is going to be "crazy" from now on.
Do you really think we'd spend £100m on Salah and Van Dijk if that's the only money we have available? That would be fecking ridiculous.
I know FSG hasn't always been reliable in the past but all the signs point to a figure closer to £200m.
Why would any club include an add on payment that required a Premier league win from Liverpool of all clubs?
27 years and counting YSB
They think he's shit for the most part. Think they're a little surprised lfc are paying that much. Bit like the cafe tbh
Is Jeremy Corbyn reliable when it comes to transfers?
Not entirely true! I would say the news has been largely received with a gallic shrug and a little shake of the head. Centre halfs are less of a priority for City than full-backs. I'm not convinced that VvD is significantly better than Otamendi or Stones and definitely not as good as Kompany. I would be fine if City bought no central defenders but would be nervous every time Kompany took the pitch!
However, I think this is a great signing for Liverpool.
Not entirely true! I would say the news has been largely received with a gallic shrug and a little shake of the head. Centre halfs are less of a priority for City than full-backs. I'm not convinced that VvD is significantly better than Otamendi or Stones and definitely not as good as Kompany. I would be fine if City bought no central defenders but would be nervous every time Kompany took the pitch!
However, I think this is a great signing for Liverpool.
Stones is dreadful mate, I'd rather have Daly Blind in my defence than him.
Anyone got the world record progression for a defender?
David Luiz
Rio
Thuram
Rio
What came before?
How the hell would he know. Hes just a fan expressing what he'd like.
Graeme Kelly saying its a lot less.
Not a chance its spread out that long... Maybe 40 + 4 payments is more realistic. If its the 60 quoted and im guessing it is seeing who lfc outbid. But we'll seeReally that long, usually isn't it at the most 5 years?