Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber
Thus says Kemo
As I stated earlier. Osimhen offers all the defensive and pressing qualities Weghorst offers us. I dont see how having him yet Rashford is always in the box like he currently is now will suddenly mean we have no cover on the left. When we loss the ball. I doubt the tean shape without the ba would change. I also I dont see why Rashford would be less instinctual. Im convinved he'd thrive off the extra help in the box, because he'd shed a marker or two. I dont see why people think having a second guy in the box would suddenly cramp his style. People forget an Osinhen is savy enough to attack the right side of the 18 whilst a rashford attacks the left snd vice versea. Even to peel off and drop deeper lurking in behind to pick up a loss ball off his efforts. Its not like he is a strijer that strictly stats in between the two posts and refuses to make room for others...Marcus doesn't have to morph, but he has to have more balance which means he has to think more rather be instinctual. He's much better when told to be direct and get into spaces and areas that allow him to shoot, all those things can be done without the ball...it's traits he's had since he came up to the senior team, which have been emphasized this season thus his goal tally. The less Marcus has to think on the ball - pass, shoot, hold up, wait for play, etc. the better. He's not in the same mindset of Bruno or Eriksen. He's a finisher. Osimhen is a finisher and guess what, they like to occupy similar spaces. Rooney and RVP occupied similar spaces and didn't come off during Year Moyes and LVG. It was only when Sir Alex deployed Rooney as a foil and he went back into his preferred ss/10 position with all things going through RVP. Osimhen can lead the line on his own, Marcus cannot, so they have to work together and get the best out of each other. That requires Marcus to be a little more of a Martinelli or Saka or even Grealish, which Marcus is not. Could he be, I have my doubts because that's not his strong suit nor is he technically capabile of those players. They are better passers with both feet, can dribble better than Marcus and retain ball possession in tight spaces better.
Yes, it can be like operating in a front 2 with the ball assuming the space is there, but then structurally off the ball and when they lose possession, the immediate press and counter press with 2 CFs narrow leaves gaps. Antony's playmaking skill seems to have higher potential with the impending signing of a better RB that suits the team better (e.g., Frimpong) going forward.
But again, signing Osimhen will require further evolution to the attacking line, whether it becomes more fluid or interchangable, etc. It would be exciting to see, but there's going to be a lot of work to be done and it maybe more different to what EtH and coaches have started to develop this year with Martial. Ever since Martial has gotten back into the squad and since he's made starts against Sevilla and Forest, the team have looked damn good in attack and chance creation. I don't think that's a coincidence.
As for Martial. Its not comocidence We look better with him simply because he is the only we have currently that knits the attack together. When he plays all the forwards pass to him and him to them. The rest of the combos simply spend their time passing to bruno and never to each other. I believe we could get the same effect out of either Osimhen and Kane. Kane even more so since he mastered the play maker 9 schtick under mourinho.