There's never going to be 100% unanimous agreement on the Caf because Caf gonna Caf but you'd get an indication from reading threads and comments all around the forums to find a medium ground (not that I based my opinion on this).
Lindelof is passive, reactive and just not good enough. The last part I don't really have a 'problem' with because many of the players in this squad are not 'good enough' in the strictest sense but I/we as fans can tolerate underlying detrimental flaws by hope of other things they bring to the pitch and potential. Lindelof neither has qualities that outweigh his deficiencies and neither the potential to be greater than he is already showing (even in a better coached team). He doesn't have one singular tangible thing in his locker that you can genuinely say 'yeah on his good day he's a really good defender'.
Lindelof is a net negative most the times; he's just another body in defence, who doesn't engage in duels, sits back and sweeps with minimal impact unless forced too. He's not young, he's played lots of games as a pro/Utd player, he's gets the comfort of being a first teamer, he has AWB shutting down his right side most of the time and he's never called out for mistakes or performances because there's always Maguire/Pogba/OGS to take the flak. He's getting an incredibly easy ride for a one-note player.
Blind would be the best example of a 'flawed' player, who you would tolerate/appreciate on the pitch because he more than makes up for it in other ways. That's the same standard and benefit of the doubt I'd judge other players too i.e I'm partial to criticism and appreciation if there's something to warrant it.