It's still the same concept, they score just as many as they need to draw or win, and the defence lets them do it every time.
We all say a few more goals and we would be up the table, well the same goes for clean sheets. Even worse is that we focused on defence this summer, so we should ideally be doing better defensively.
These kind of opinions almost make me angry. Look, no team in football, ever, concedes zero goals. It's going to happen. We have conceded on average 1 goal per game. Could that be better? Of course, but it's not bad or a major problem.
Like I've said before, the main reason we're doing terribly is the fact that we don't score. We have scored 1.18 goals per game. That's just not enough. Any top team scores way more than that. Top teams, however, don't necessarily concede less than us. Just look at the average scored/conceded per game in the current top 5:
Team / Scored / Conceded
1. Liverpool 2.27 / 0.82
2. Man. City 3.09 / 0.9
3. Leicester 2.45 / 0.73
4. Chelsea 2.27 / 1.55
5. Arsenal 1.45 / 1.36
.
.
13. Man United 1.18 / 1
If we wouldn't count the first match against Chelsea that ended 4-0, which I now consider a fluke, our goal average would be 0.9. That would be the worst goal scoring average in the entire league, excluding Watford. Meanwhile, our conceded average is the 5th best (least conceded).
So all this talk about us having a lousy defense just doesn't hold. Yes, it could be better, but I bet my left arm if you look at the goals other teams have conceded you will also find defender mistakes. That's usually why goals are scored in the first place. 100% clean sheets without mistakes just don't happen. That's almost like expecting attacking players to score 100% of the time.
What we need is an improved midfield and attack with more consistent goal scoring/scorers. We just don't have that right now and that's why we're doing so terribly.