Lindelof and Smalling were in the other penalty box. Lindelof ran home, Smalling didnt. That was my point.My criticism of Lindelof is fair as he should have blocked the shot. I expect that. I also praise Smalling for blocking shots. That was my point. However, your critique of Smalling not being around to do something is made up only because you got upset I critiqued Lindelof. Don't tell me you would be expecting Lindelof to leave his position and pop up out of nowhere to block a shot Smalling should have blocked.
Lindelof and Smalling were in the other penalty box. Lindelof ran home, Smalling didnt. That was my point.
And maybe he should have blocked the shot, or he should have done what he actually did and cover everything except the first post. As I wrote before, this is what he has been doing succesfully the whole season, and so many times that it cannot be a coinciden. I believe he does that because he knows that if only leaves a small opening for the first post, DDG will save it. If he tries to block the shot instead of give the attacker a small opening, it may end up anywhere. Or in this case it would be easy to pass the ball.
Our defence certainly was loose.May be loosing was the plan. So we could focus on more important games. I think if Swansea had won today, we would’ve performed better. Idk. Just a weird theory that I have.
its very clear he isn't ball playing defender. his best attribute is actually is positioning and moving quickly to avert dangers.That is what he does every game. Receive the ball, take a nice touch, advance some meters with the ball, and pass sideways to Smalling or Shaw. Rinse and repeat.
Uhm. No. Smalling in those positions would have blocked both the shots, so no goals. He does that all the time, and weirdly enough rarely do you see people give him any credit for blocking shots like that. Ironically you don't think Lindelof could have done anything about those, so I guess shots in and around the box just isn't a important thing to stop then, for a defender. It was not jittery from Lindelof, it was poor. He did well to get himself into the position to block both shots, then he just fell asleep, or pussied out.
Is it harsh to say if we're being honest, he's had a good 10-15 game spell and has now reverted to type?
Or is it more a case of gradual improvement and he's just in a little dip?
I just ask because it's been nearly 10 or so years, and we always seem to let a small upturn in form convince us that Smalling and Jones might actually be good enough for something more than just a top 4 slot (at best).
Yes 15 games where the majority have been good, but certainly not all of them. After another terrible start to the season.
The 15 games came after his last international break so hopefully he can do the same thing. But he still has a lot to prove at this point
Look, there are some posters who pop up in every thread to write about Smalling and his glory. In this case he is supposedly an amazing shot blocker who has never let a shot through and if he was the person who had made the long run home, he would of course have taken the ball from the theee attackers, etc etc.You are being biased. It’s not about Smalling couldn’t sense the danger, we were 1-0 down, we need to score, he saw Shaw could have clear it for us to attack again & Lindelof dropped back to have extra cover in defense. The judgment was wrong but it has nothing to do with not able to sense the danger, unfortunate that Shaw clearance wasn’t long enough.
Seems like it.Do you just go round the forum looking for opportunities to post about Chris Smalling?
Look, there are some posters who pop up in every thread to write about Smalling and his glory. In this case he is supposedly an amazing shot blocker who has never let a shot through and if he was the person who had made the long run home, he would of course have taken the ball from the theee attackers, etc etc.
But it’s like a camera. The best is the one you have with you, not the one in the drawer. Doesn’t matter how amazing Smalling is at shot blocking if he is not there because he didn’t make the long run to defend his goal. This was clearly the wrong place to celebrate Smallngs shot blocking abilities.
Seems like it.
Never said he wasn’t good. Smalling is a good defender. But in this case he was not there because he was jogging home.Smalling has joint 3rd most shots blocked in the premier league alongside Ben Mee and Shane Duffy.
Toby is the 2nd highest from the top clubs on the list this season at joint 27th with exactly half as many shots blocked on average as Smalling per game (0.6 to 1.2)
I wonder if you research these things before complaining about them because Smalling is the most frequent shot blocker out of the top 6 teams.
Also only players from clubs position 16 and lower in the league have players who have blocked more shots than he has on average this season. So teams constantly under pressure. And those 2 players are Tarkowski and Bednarek.
So yes out of all the CBs in the league Smalling is probably the most likely to have blocked the shots Lindelof hasnt. And Lindelof averages 1/3 as many as Smalling does so more often than not its Smalling taking charge and blocking the shot, rather than Lindelof.
Seems weird then to complain that for once Lindelof is having to do what Smalling is always doing.
Never said he wasn’t good. Smalling is a good defender. But in this case he was not there because he was jogging home.
Look, there are some posters who pop up in every thread to write about Smalling and his glory. In this case he is supposedly an amazing shot blocker who has never let a shot through and if he was the person who had made the long run home, he would of course have taken the ball from the theee attackers, etc etc.
But it’s like a camera. The best is the one you have with you, not the one in the drawer. Doesn’t matter how amazing Smalling is at shot blocking if he is not there because he didn’t make the long run to defend his goal. This was clearly the wrong place to celebrate Smallngs shot blocking abilities.
I was not talking about who has the best stats. I can also see that Smalling has 1.2 blocks per 90 minutes, it is very easy to see.Right, but he's statistically the best at shot blocking which is what the discussion was about. So if any CB is going to do better blocking than Lindelof did, its Smalling
This is Lindelof thread and people make an example of how great Smalling is, when he was actually not even around. You can see Smalling fans infect more or less every thread.Let's be real. Lindelof was poor last night, while Smalling had a good one.
Whether Smalling was able to block the shot or no, who knows. But you continue to the extent where you made him like that he didn't drop back because he couldn't sense the danger.
This is Lindelof thread and people make an example of how great Smalling is, when he was actually not even around. You can see Smalling fans infect more or less every thread.
I was not talking about who has the best stats. I can also see that Smalling has 1.2 blocks per 90 minutes, it is very easy to see.
No. My post was a reaction to MikeKing writing that Smalling would have blocked both those shots and that Lindelof either fell asleep or pussied out.Aren’t you the one who started mention that Smalling didn’t block the shot and wasn’t even around? People only use Smalling to compare of how little or bad Lindelof did last night, you were the one who end up getting involved yourself into a Smalling’s argument.
No I wasn’t talking about Smalling blocking skills. See above.So you werent talking about Smalling apparently being great at blocking, which is proven to be true. Well thats what you said.
No. My post was a reaction to MikeKing writing that Smalling would have blocked both those shots and that Lindelof either fell asleep or pussied out.
He did not sense the danger in this situation which was very clear if you look how jogs home and when it is too late he starts to run. The alternative is he sensed danger but didn’t care or was too tired to run, which I personally doubt.You both were basically using Smalling as plot device of the argument to defend and attack Lindelof. But as far what I know your point is biased by calling him couldn’t sense a danger, I’m not on MikeKing’s side and I wouldn’t say I agee with him. You are entitled to defend a player but you seem to defend a poor performance of Lindelof and trying to find something bad from Smalling who had a good performance.
It was you who included Smalling in the post in here that I responded to. I disagree that the both of them were jittery and used the comparison of Smalling being good at blocking shots and stopping the sort of goals we conceded, to prove Lindelof didn't do it this game. If that first goal gets blocked, people might not even mention it post match as a moment of danger even. That says something about the importance of certain defensive actions doesn't it, and I find it a bit fascinating how it often gets ignored. It was more so about that than praising Smalling to shit on Lindelof.Do you just go round the forum looking for opportunities to post about Chris Smalling?
@A-man Now I feel you are the one almost derailing this thread on purpose. If you want to critique Smalling for being a 'reactive player' of whatever then why not write about it in his thread?
He has pulled out of the Sweden squad.I'd give him a rest vs Watford, he's played what, every game bar two since Ole took over? Bound to start every game for Sweden during the international break as well.
Love the fact he got pissed after we were 2 down then started going really aggressive in his tackles.
It was a late tackle but not a red, If thats a red then might as well take tackling out of football. We haven't had a defender who is aggressive since vidic, of course not stupid aggressive like Bailly but one that puts fear into attackers mind, so it was nice to see him put bit more into a tackle (not only talking about the yellow card tackle).And almost got sent off for it. Love 'pashun' all you want but coolheadedness is always better than hotheadedness. Especially for a defender.