Where are the 'we need an aerially dominant CB' caveman brigade now? Rondon is a beast and Lindelof more than held his own against him. He also should have got way more credit for how many times he had to cover Atsu when Valencia sleeping.
We do still need an aerially dominant CB.
It's one of the reasons we look so poor at defending set-plays.
We do still need an aerially dominant CB.
It's one of the reasons we look so poor at defending set-plays.
I'd say we're far from set but it'll do. None of the entire first choice back 4 are good enough at the minute.Put Smalling in there, and we are set defensively. RB might be a concern defensively, although for all of his shortcomings in attack, Valencia is quite good defensively.
There are question marks regarding Smalling and playing out from the back, but also keeping possession in midfield. Jones is actually very good at finding pockets of space to either drive into or to find a teammate in and around the midfield circle. I doubt Smalling could do the same, and he would also force Lindelöf to the left, most likely.
I think Smalling/Lindelof is strong enough for that - although that comes at the cost of Smalling's passing.
It's too basic to think that an aerially dominant CB fixes set piece weaknesses. Even if we had bought someone like VVD we'd be just as bad because of how we set up - we don't block runners and we sit very deep, DDG stays deep as well which invites pressure (hopefully this will gradually change under Ole). Goal vs Bournemouth wasn't a CB error, it was a set piece to feet that undid us. Cardiff goal was due to Rashford's handball - nothing to do with CBs, Hudderfield was Pogba losing a header and Herrera not tracking the runner.
If we could get a properly WC CB, i'd be keen but just buying someone who is strong aerially doesn't make sense to me.
Wilson beat him to a ball on one occassion through sheer pace in the first half. Luckily for us, the ball was going away from him or else he was through on goal. Against better quality teams he would've been punished, because there would've been passing options. Playing a high line with him against fast players will be suicide. Zahore who plays for Cardiff knocked a ball past him and exposed his lack of pace just last week too.
Gomez who plays for Liverpool is blessed physically and is a good footballer, so he'd do fine next to Jones.
John Stones is a proven prem player and would do fine too. Laporte has shown his ability in one of the best leagues in the world in Spain, playing for a midtable club. All three players would be a upgrade on Lindelof from the evidence of their performances playing for clubs like Everton and Athletic Bilbao.
Seems like he fits better with Jones than Bailly. Not just because he gets to play RCB instead of left, which of course helps. But I believe it is also because despite some flaws, Lindelof know where Jones is, what he is going to do, and can trust him more than Bailly who likes to do unexpected things. I also saw that Herrera covered for Lindelof sometimes when he advanced forward.
Where are the 'we need an aerially dominant CB' caveman brigade now? Rondon is a beast and Lindelof more than held his own against him. He also should have got way more credit for how many times he had to cover Atsu when Valencia sleeping.
We still need one. One game doesn’t change anything.
Jones got some mistakes in him, but still he is relatively predictable.Not sure about that - I don't even think Phil Jones know's what Phil Jones is going to do half the time.
Why you don't give up on players after one season. Some wanted him sold in the summer.
That was during the Jose war. Signing Lindelof for 30m being used a reason why Jose shouldn't buy another CB was always ridiculous.Why you don't give up on players after one season. Some wanted him sold in the summer.
Blind toyed with Lukaku once among other strong CFs.Where are the 'we need an aerially dominant CB' caveman brigade now? Rondon is a beast and Lindelof more than held his own against him. He also should have got way more credit for how many times he had to cover Atsu when Valencia sleeping.
Jose sucking the life out of all of his signings was a good enough reason not to trust him with more money.That was during the Jose war. Signing Lindelof for 30m being used a reason why Jose shouldn't buy another CB was always ridiculous.
It wasn't argued that way, it was all about how Lindelof was a pub player who we didn't need.Jose sucking the life out of all of his signings was a good enough reason not to trust him with more money.
Disagree here. I think so far this season he's at the very least matched Smalling on the defensive side of the game. The thing that puts Vic above Chris for me is he has much more to his game on the ball so if hes putting in as good as defensive performances as Chris, then he's the better CB imo.He is our only CB which has world class potential. I still think that Smalling might be our best defender
Like I said, playing against mediocre teams where we have 70% possession he'll be fine. I still maintain he isn't good enough as a defender, playing in a high line for a club like ours.Any thoughts of his lack of speed and strength last night?
Predictably badJones got some mistakes in him, but still he is relatively predictable.
Like I said, playing against mediocre teams where we have 70% possession he'll be fine. I still maintain he isn't good enough as a defender, playing in a high line for a club like ours.
I've seen his speed and strength and have given you examples of his physical flaw. Zahore of Cardiff exposed his lack of pace against Cardiff.So no comments regarding his speed and strength he demonstrated last night?
Like I said, playing against mediocre teams where we have 70% possession he'll be fine. I still maintain he isn't good enough as a defender, playing in a high line for a club like ours.
Would give him better vision to see it sailing over his headI like Lindelof.
Just wish he shaved his hair off! Would look like a proper defender then and might sway opinions