It's not ridiculous, it's an extremely valid point even if you're offended by it. I'm Scandi, I would love for Lindelöf to do well and I am biased in that regard - but it won't affect my opinion of him whatsoever. My main concern with him is that he looks "scared", out of control and on the back foot in the Premier League. He looks extremely relived every time the ball is cleared or the situation is solved, there is no confidence or composure in his body language - and it matters. Do you think strikers are afraid to go head to head with him like they are with van Dijk or Alderweireld? Of course not, quite the opposite I would assume. I wouldn't care one bit if he looks like a kid in every challenge as long as we keep clean sheets and look solid, but like I mentioned earlier in this thread, we have let in over 20 goals in our first 12 league games and have kept one clean sheet. I read some say he has been great since the Juventus-game, I beg to differ. We have let in goals in every game and against Bournemouth we were terrible at the back, giving away space and looking very disorganized. In Turin we were just terribly lucky and should have been 3-4 down on a bad day, once again looking very open at the back (which can be expected there to be fair). Dybala hit the bar, Cuadrado missed a sitter, Khedira hit the post... and when Ronaldo scored Lindelöf failed to cover the player and the space behind him. It was great execution by Ronaldo, it was also weak defending by Victor. He is slow, he knows it himself, he needs to take out space and clear the danger when it's Ronaldo lurking around. At City we let in three goals and it could have been six. The Swede hasn't been any worse than the others in these games, but let's not pretend he has been great. If so we have lowered the bar completely.