Shane88
Actually Nostradamus
Not to go all Helen Lovejoy on it but that is very dangerous. The keeper is sprinting and Joelinton yanks his neck back. Deliberate and totally reckless, he should get a ban for it.
It's only GW 2 and it's hard to imagine how the officials will top that for "Worst decisions of the year".
Not just one, but two shockers within a couple minutes.
Who said anything about missing it ? Newcastle have avoided more than 5 red cards between last season and this game. Their players are thugs and no referee is doing anything about it.Objectively, that is absolute hilarious that a literal WWE clothesline has been missed.
Look,everyone hasreferees have got what they’ve been asking for and we’ve now got a version of VAR where everything gets checked for the sole purpose of saying “referee’s call” and going with the on field decision 100% of the time.
Referee’s call at the end of the day. VAR isn’t there to get decisions right, it’s there to back up the referee.How has VAR looked at that Joelinton incident and decided that yellow is fine?
Doesn't VAR have the authority to intervene if it feels the incident deserves a red but only a yellow has been given? I feel like I have seen yellows being upgraded to red and vice versa with VAR intervention.Referee’s call at the end of the day. VAR isn’t there to get decisions right, it’s there to back up the referee.
Would have been a red in rugby for a dangerous high tackle let alone football. If the arm had been a Bournemouth arm on the Newcastle keeper I’m 100% sure he would have been off.Say what you will about the handball, but on what planet is deliberately close-lining the goalkeeper not a red card?
Scandalous refereeing.
They probably didn’t get involved in that. That goal though was not clear and obvious, most would say it came off the very top of the arm /shoulder and should have stood, where was the clear and obvious mistake to award it which the ref did?How has VAR looked at that Joelinton incident and decided that yellow is fine?
Why not? There was a strong challenge just now in the Liverpool game where a yellow was awarded and the commentators specifically mentioned that VAR has has a look at it and has agreed with the on field decision.They probably didn’t get involved in that. That goal though was not clear and obvious, most would say it came off the very top of the arm /shoulder and should have stood, where was the clear and obvious mistake to award it which the ref did?
I fecking hate VAR but I hate the bottling clubs who voted for it to stay when we could have got rid of it even more.
They probably didn’t get involved in that. That goal though was not clear and obvious, most would say it came off the very top of the arm /shoulder and should have stood, where was the clear and obvious mistake to award it which the ref did?
I fecking hate VAR but I hate the bottling clubs who voted for it to stay when we could have got rid of it even more.
To get a definitive answer you’d be better off writing a strongly worded letter to VAR and cc The Times. Not sure you’d get a clear and obvious answer though.Why not? There was a strong challenge just now in the Liverpool game where a yellow was awarded and the commentators specifically mentioned that VAR has has a look at it and has agreed with the on field decision.
Handballs immediately before goals are objective decisions. Contact with arm by goalscorer = disallowed.They probably didn’t get involved in that. That goal though was not clear and obvious, most would say it came off the very top of the arm /shoulder and should have stood, where was the clear and obvious mistake to award it which the ref did?
I fecking hate VAR but I hate the bottling clubs who voted for it to stay when we could have got rid of it even more.
Thanks, I know you mean well but I’m still confused by VARHandballs immediately before goals are objective decisions. Contact with arm by goalscorer = disallowed.
The "clear and obvious error" test only applies to subjective decisions; i.e. foul or not, yellow or red, etc.
I watched a lot of Championship football last season and I concur, a throwback to the good old days.Watched 3 games over the weekend, 1 was with VAR, Brighton v Man Utd.. other 2 were Wrexham v Reading... Swansea v Cardiff no VAR..
Those 2 games were so much better to watch in terms of no anxiety in if VAR sees something we don't is it a goal ? Etc etc.. I really enjoyed watching knowing that a game wasn't going to be spoilt.. there were plenty of incidents in Swansea game , all dealt with by the officials no real dramas .. no need for VAR at all
Watched 3 games over the weekend, 1 was with VAR, Brighton v Man Utd.. other 2 were Wrexham v Reading... Swansea v Cardiff no VAR..
Those 2 games were so much better to watch in terms of no anxiety in if VAR sees something we don't is it a goal ? Etc etc.. I really enjoyed watching knowing that a game wasn't going to be spoilt.. there were plenty of incidents in Swansea game , all dealt with by the officials no real dramas .. no need for VAR at all
However it’s a game played by individuals and it was reffed by an individual and two lines, oops sorry assistants refs, (who brought that shite in)?Games were spoiled by poor decisions all the time pre-VAR. This only holds up if we accept the refs decisions were all perfect and don't watch any replays showing where the officials fecked up.
Watched 3 games over the weekend, 1 was with VAR, Brighton v Man Utd.. other 2 were Wrexham v Reading... Swansea v Cardiff no VAR..
Those 2 games were so much better to watch in terms of no anxiety in if VAR sees something we don't is it a goal ? Etc etc.. I really enjoyed watching knowing that a game wasn't going to be spoilt.. there were plenty of incidents in Swansea game , all dealt with by the officials no real dramas .. no need for VAR at all
Games were spoiled by poor decisions all the time pre-VAR. There was a clamour to bring in video technology because people were pissed off at wrong decisions affecting results, when the video replays showed what had really happened.
Your post only holds up if we accept the refs decisions were all perfect and don't watch any replays showing where the officials fecked up.
However it’s a game played by individuals and it was reffed by an individual and two lines, oops sorry assistants refs, (who brought that shite in)?
Mistakes happen in all areas of life, some more important than others but this is a game and primarily it’s in the entertainment business and that entertainment is slowly been eroded by stopping the game and studying in minute detail incidents that really should be just left to the ref.
Daft offsides where they let play continue and then five minutes later put the flag up, it’s all negative. Remember the ref getting shouted at and songs sung about him going to Spec Savers? It was all part of the game and should be once more.
Games were not spoilt, the result might not have gone your way or certain decisions you didn’t agree with but Christ we still get that now with VAR only VAR really is ruining the game.
Games were never spoiled by correct decisions before VAR. Now we still have enjoyment being soured by bad refereeing AND when the correct decision is reached in the end, because we can no longer enjoy goals without sweating about VAR finding a way to spoil things.
The idea that all that matters in football is making sure that every decision is as close to perfect as possible shows a spectacular ignorance of the whole purpose of the fecking sport. It’s supposed to be entertainment, not a court of law.
Completely agree. I never wanted it before, and expected it to go this way. There’s nothing about it I like.Games were never spoiled by correct decisions before VAR. Now we still have enjoyment being soured by bad refereeing AND when the correct decision is reached in the end, because we can no longer enjoy goals without sweating about VAR finding a way to spoil things.
The idea that all that matters in football is making sure that every decision is as close to perfect as possible shows a spectacular ignorance of the whole purpose of the fecking sport. It’s supposed to be entertainment, not a court of law.