Parma Dewol
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 1,911
Keeping VAR and getting better referees would make sense. But then very little in football makes sense these days.
It's a figure of speech I wasn't the original poster who said life was fine without VAR, but overall I do agree with his sentiment. Football was more enjoyable to watch. As a fan, I could actually celebrate goals.
It was better, though.
Football without VAR is better. Football has too many subjective calls for it to ever be 100% fool proof.
You still had inconsistent and controversial decisions but it was split second decisions, not still getting it wrong with the option to review it from several different angles.
I don't think VAR as such is a massive problem just how they choose to apply it from game to game.
That doesn't stop me from worrying that they'll find a way to disallow any goal. There was one vs Fulham away in November where I actually celebrated it as I knew the two players who touched the ball weren't offside, but VAR still found a way to disallow it due to a 'subjective offside'. Moments like those make you worry about any goal being disallowed.Sorry my mad it's a been long day . I actually forgot the initial phrase included the word life.
Yeah as I've said I don't get the not celebrating thing. It's a minority of goals disallowed.
That doesn't stop me from worrying that they'll find a way to disallow any goal. There was one vs Fulham away in November where I actually celebrated it as I knew the two players who touched the ball weren't offside, but VAR still found a way to disallow it due to a 'subjective offside'. Moments like those make you worry about any goal being disallowed.
That doesn’t bother me. I just want to spontaneity back. That’s paramount for me.These refs aren't going to be anything any better if they removed VAR though. They'll be just as shit and there'll be no chance of getting up the right decision.
This is the logical solution. And if the challenge successfully overturns the call, you get it back, as in the NFL.Make it on a challenge basis. 1 per team per game.
Given it’s the most powerful, emotive element of watching a game of football, yes, absolutely.Except few (and yes, there were only few) VAR major mistakes, this season biggest outrage after every round is about was some penalty "soft" or not (but there WAS a contact and it has nothing to do with VAR).
Now, lets go few seasons in the past; goals from offsides and after clear fouls, penalties after clear dives, brutal tackles for red cards not seen by the ref and similiar shit.
Some of you really want that back? Just because you can't celebrate goals like you did before? Mind-blowing stuff.
Exactly . It's their Palpatine moment.Getting rid of it is exactly what the monkeys operating the system want.
The way VAR has been run is borderline sabotage.
Getting rid of it is exactly what the monkeys operating the system want.
The way VAR has been run is borderline sabotage.
How do you decide if you're challenge is "right" though?They should swap it out for an appeals system like cricket or american football. one challenge per half. if you're right you keep the challenge
I agree.Sure but the whole point is if the refs are crap (which they are) then VAR just adds to the issue. VAR fundamentally changes the game, slows down decisions, stops celebrations, over analyses situations and if they can’t even reach the correct decision then what’s the point in accepting all of that. What people have always failed to realise though is that VAR was never going to fix enough issues to be worth those trade offs. There’s too many subjective calls and I’d far rather get some wrong decisions in real time than getting them after all this garbage slow down analysis. At least you can accept real time human error.
If that situation with Amrabat and Gordon was on the other end and we weren’t given a penalty, I’d be fuming.
You could give them 5 years of training and they would still be absolutely rubbish. Wolves are even more stupid to think this is the solution.
If that situation with Amrabat and Gordon was on the other end and we weren’t given a penalty, I’d be fuming.
Agree with that. Still think that VAR would not have overturned it had the ref given it.Never a penalty. Casemiro takes the ball. Gordon and Amrabat is just ordinary collision. Not every contact is penalty.
Never a penalty. Casemiro takes the ball. Gordon and Amrabat is just ordinary collision. Not every contact is penalty.
If that situation with Amrabat and Gordon was on the other end and we weren’t given a penalty, I’d be fuming.
Yeh, was a pen. Didn't think it was in real time, still didn't think it was after a couple replays. But the more I saw it the more it looked a pen.
That was nothing. Small contact. Casemiro took the ball away. Gordon was never going to get chance. For me, no penalty.It wasn't an ordinary collision. He trods on his achilles. It's a foul.
I wouldn’t, it was marginal at best. Casemiro made a good tackle, Amrabat and Gordon had a clash of legs but nothing clear cut.