Utd Kits 22/23

The right two look like they’re cut from leftover quilt covers from the 1987 Littlewood's catalogue. Are they serious with that?
 
Which ones did you guys like better? The ones Nike did or the new one from Adidas?


130210195220-manchester-van-persie-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg

g1igL9BbyqIL2fZ.jpg
 
Dont like it. Looks like something you would buy at a market in turkey made by ‘abibas’
 
Pretty sure our away form has dropped this season because of the horrible kit.

The plaid kit is not bad really, the other two I can do without.
 
They’re all awful. How hard can it be to create a decent kit? Who at the club is approving these? Surely we can tell them their kit looks shite and to try again.
 
I may be an outlier but i love the Adidas stuff, its the sponsors logos that have been the issue for the last few years. Chevy was shocking, yellow and red together always looks horrendous no matter how neat the kit design is. I''d love to see something like that AON logo back, but Team Viewer is still .miles better than Chevy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cheimoon
I have a theory they make them as ugly as possible because somebody has data somewhere that suggests the same people shelling out £80 for a kit are the same people who overpay for garish urban style garms.

I refuse to believe a company as big as us or adidas would operate in any other way
 
Those kits are all the worst I've seen probably in the history of this club.
 
Anyone else think adidas are trying to spite us at the min? Probably regret sponsoring us. Everything about us stinks at the moment.
 
Those colours are all wrong. Footy headlines are sure away kit will be white and the third kit is a fluorescent/hi-vis yellow.

These must be fan mock-ups. Pretty terrible fan mock ups.

edit - they have even leaked the away socks
man-utd-21-22-away-kit%2B%25284%2529.jpg
 
Last edited:
Those colours are all wrong. Footy headlines are sure away kit will be white and the third kit is a fluorescent/hi-vis yellow.

These must be fan mock-ups. Pretty terrible fan mock ups.
Hope you’re right. The home one seems fairly legit - hope the box around the crest is more like the 1994-96 shirt though.
 
I'm shocked that the Glazers haven't tried to cash in on the anti-Galzer sentiment by releasing a green and gold shirt. They would sell loads of them.
 
If these are real, I think it's blown it out of the water for the worst set of kits we've ever had. Normally there's been at least one kit that has been decent, but this is a clean sweep of stinkers.

They’re not
 
I think people mostly like the kits we had when we happened to be mint, and dislike the ones that we've worn during times we were shit.

Hence why people think the Adidas era has been shite.
Nah, look at how popular the 80s Adidas kits were and still are, and often those from seasons where we won very little if anything. They were just better. These days they have to make them objectionable most of the time simply so they don't look too similar to the 27 other kits we've released this decade.
 
I'd guess you're right. Although I've heard rumours we are going to have a day glow shirt next season, which I'd imagine will be just as awful as any of these.

oh yeah. I think our home kit and third kits will be bad, but they’re not them. They’re just mock ups.
 

(Figured it doesn't deserve its own thread)

Anyway I don't mind this actually, surely they would provide something better looking than the factory line dross that addi puts for us up every year.
 
Always like what Adam Scott wears, this could be good for us.

When are we done with adidas?
 
Always like what Adam Scott wears, this could be good for us.

When are we done with adidas?
It was a 10 year deal signed in 15/16 I believe so a few more seasons unfortunately, but we could get stuck with it for even longer as it says the negotiation for renewal may already be underway.

Honestly im tired of addidas, I can point to single good kit they made for us while our late 2000s output by nile had several bangers.

Exemplifies the club's decline in our looks somehow.