US Presidential Election: Tuesday November 6th, 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.
I saw the Maher piece. I also saw the interview with Alexandra Pelosi. Interesting how you only chose to show the one part of the documentary depicting the people in the south.

Cause when I posted that, I had only seen last week's episode and was in the process of downloading last night's.
Just got done watching last night's a few mins ago..:)


This is the piece from last night for those who missed it, folks from NYC for those wanting to see the other side of the coin..

 
Cause when I posted that, I had only seen last week's episode and was in the process of downloading last night's.
Just got done watching last night's a few mins ago..:)


This is the piece from last night for those who missed it, folks from NYC for those wanting to see the other side of the coin..



Cheers.

I lived in the south for a few years and coming from California it seemed quite different. However, I think people in that part of the country get a very bad rap. Most are good decent people. I think it was said in the Pelosi interview well, you can always find a few idiots, put them in front of a camera and get them to say idiotic things.
 
Scott Brown, the Republican Senator from Massachusetts who famously won Ted Kennedy's senate seat, has had the following to say about the GOP contenders:

“I see that both Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum now have Secret Service with them on the campaign trail,” Brown said. “And in Santorum’s case, I think it’s the first time he’s actually ever used protection.”


:lol:
 
"The scourge of pornography"

What is this, the 1950s? And on the position of banning it, whatever happened to the Republican right's opposition to government meddling in people's lives?
 
It's a silly tactic from Santorum. He knows the only conceivable way to slow Romney down is to mobilize conservative voters, but in trying to do so, he's picked the most ridiculous issue. Banning porn is an old school 1980s televangelist issue that resonates with no one except Santorum and a few religious nutters on the right.
 
He's picking a losing topic on this one but doesn't the article say he'd "enforce". So aren't these already laws? Is not the president supposed to enforce/uphold the laws?

Santorum is a fool on lots of issues IMO but I didn't see a quote saying he'd ban porn or pass new laws banning it (besides that would be utterly impossible).
 
Cheers.

I lived in the south for a few years and coming from California it seemed quite different. However, I think people in that part of the country get a very bad rap. Most are good decent people. I think it was said in the Pelosi interview well, you can always find a few idiots, put them in front of a camera and get them to say idiotic things.

Absolutely. Shouldn't need saying , but it's ridiculous how comfortable so many 'enlightened' folks are caricaturing them.
 
He's a puritanical moron who's more interested in what goes on in your bedroom than anything else. While he should be focusing on the economy, jobs, etc, he's sticking his nose in other people's business and trying to impose his own beliefs on everyone else. He and his dominionist friends want to trample the long-held traditions of separation of church and state in the United States and create their own theocratic regime, which is based on their bullshit origin claims.
 
(CBS News) MOLINE, Ill. - Rick Santorum is coming under fire for saying that the unemployment rate and economic growth are secondary issues to that of freedom in his campaign, a statement that rival Mitt Romney's campaign quickly seized on as being tone-deaf to the plight of out-of-work Americans.
"We need a candidate who's going to be a fighter for freedom. Who's going to get up and make that the central theme in this race because it is the central theme in this race," Santorum told a crowd of about 200 voters during a rally here on Monday. "I don't care what the unemployment rate's going to be. Doesn't matter to me. My campaign doesn't hinge on unemployment rates and growth rates. It's something more foundational that's going on."

The event had barely ended when Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul e-mailed reporters to offer up the statement as evidence of Santorum being an "economic lightweight," a charge that Romney has been making in recent days. The former Massachusetts governor gave a speech in Chicago on Monday attacking President Obama's stewardship of the economy.

"Wow. Sen. Santorum may not care about the unemployment rate in this country or the nearly 24 million Americans struggling for work, but Mitt Romney does and is running to get people back to work," Saul said. "If anyone needed evidence that Rick Santorum is an economic lightweight, they needn't look any further than his various statements today. We're not going to turn around this economy by replacing one former senator with zero job-creating experience with another senator with zero job-creating experience. He has proven it once again," she wrote.

Romney himself, in a subsequent appearance at Bradley University, reaffirmed his concern for unemployment.

"One of the people who is running also for the Republican nomination today said that he doesn't care about the unemployment rate; that does bother me," Romney said. "I do care about the unemployment rate. It does bother me. I want to get people back to work."

Santorum sought to clarify his comments to reporters after the event by saying that freedom supersedes the unemployment issue, and he tried to paint Romney's economic plan as a non-conservative approach.

"Of course I care about the unemployment rate. I want the unemployment rate to go down, but I'm saying, my candidacy doesn't hinge on whether the unemployment rate goes up and down," he said. "Our candidacy's about something that transcends that; its about freedom, its not about, you know, Governor Romney's idea that he's going to fix the economy which is something that, of course, we as Republicans don't believe that presidents fix the economy; we believe that we try to do things to create an atmosphere for the economy to fix itself."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_...care-what-the-unemployment-rates-going-to-be/

:lol: The gift that keeps on giving.
 
Santitation is never going to be the nominee...so no worries.

But Mittens has confirmed the economy is improving....so why is he running.

btw Romney critics Obama's leadership in Afghanistan...Asked what he would do different, by leading. He says he will follow what the people on the ground tell him...

They are both idiots...just that Sanitorium is an honest idiot.
 
Santorum should stay in the race for as long as possible. He will soften Romney up nicely to where by the time Obama sees him, he will be an unhinged corporate flip flopper who resembles a Toy Story character more than a politician.
 
Did anyone miss the 'Santorum's Netherlands' cock-up?

That video showed Mr. Santorum claiming that elderly Dutch people wear a bracelet reading “Do not euthanize me.” Over audible gasps from the audience, he continued:

Because they have voluntary euthanasia in the Netherlands, but half the people who are euthanized every year — and it’s 10 percent of all deaths for the Netherlands — half of those people are euthanized involuntarily, at hospitals, because they are older and sick. And so elderly people in the Netherlands don’t go to the hospital, they go to another country, because they’re afraid because of budget purposes that they will not come out of that hospital if they go into it with sickness.

As Buzzfeed noted, Dutch journalists found it easy to refute Mr. Santorum’s statistics, and made fun of his “fact-free” claim that euthanasia was forced on anyone, but they had no idea where he got the idea that the nation’s elderly wear “Do not euthanize me” bracelets.

Ms. Bundy, the embassy spokeswoman, told The Washington Post, “According to the Ministry of Health, ‘Do not euthanize me’ bracelets do not exist in the Netherlands.”

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/20...-false-claim-they-practise-forced-euthanasia/
 
:lol:

Santorum spewing out of his arse there.

Wasn't too long ago that he "blamed" the fall of the British Empire on the introduction of the NHS.
 
Listened to some of his comments yesterday on the radio this morning...OMG what a fecking retard he is.
 
April will be a huge month for Romney, he can kill off Santorum.

April 3: Maryland (37, Winner take all), Washington DC (19, WTA), Wisconsin (41, WTA, Romney +13)

April 24: Connecticut (mostly proportional, 28, Romney +23), Delaware (17, WTA), New York (95, mostly WTA), Pennsylvania (72, 'proportional'), Rhode Island (19, proportional)

He can double his lead and reach about 800 delegates till the end of the month.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.