Some tacky comments in this thread.
Maybe he's happy the guy is dead because he claimed to be a journalist but made a career out of doctoring his footage to paint people HE disagreed with in the worst possible light, ruining peoples' lives, destroying entire organizations for the horrible crime of trying to help poor people vote?
Do you actually know who Andrew Breitbart was or did you just feel this was a great opportunity to to play the scold?
He had the courage of his convictions, I didn't always agree with his methods but no decent man would revel in his death.
I only know a little about Brieitbart. Seems like a right wing bomb thrower.
right then. you are excused.
Exactly. So it means his influence was small if not non existent. And it also means he really only affected libs like you by pissing them off.
He had the courage of his convictions, I didn't always agree with his methods but no decent man would revel in his death.
Right, he had such strong convictions that he was willing to lie about the people he was supposedly reporting on in order to misrepresent their views and statements. How courageous.
What point are you trying to make? I have said I disagreed with some of his methods, I imagine he saw them as a means to an end.
What point are you trying to make? I have said I disagreed with some of his methods, I imagine he saw them as a means to an end. We weren't discussing whether he was an ethical journalist, I merely pointed out that it was remarkably undignified to revel in the death of another man. You seem to think that it's perfectly fine as long as he's a conservative pundit with a chequered history.
What point are you trying to make? I have said I disagreed with some of his methods, I imagine he saw them as a means to an end. We weren't discussing whether he was an ethical journalist, I merely pointed out that it was remarkably undignified to revel in the death of another man. You seem to think that it's perfectly fine as long as he's a conservative pundit with a chequered history.
I repeat.
What point are you trying to make? I have said I disagreed with some of his methods, I imagine he saw them as a means to an end. We weren't discussing whether he was an ethical journalist, I merely pointed out that it was remarkably undignified to revel in the death of another man. You seem to think that it's perfectly fine as long as he's a conservative pundit with a chequered history.
There are many people I would be pleased to see go. It's not like I would actively work towards or wish for their death, but I won't shed a tear, nor will I hold back in my criticism just because they are now dead.
Bottom line is, the world is probably a better place without this jackass.
Other people on the list: Ratzinger, Dick Cheney, al-Assad, etc.
There's a difference between dignified criticism and tasteless comments like: "Pleased he's rotting in hell". Still, it's a forum for opinions and if that's how people want to conduct themselves then I cannot stop them.
Addressed.
Well if there is a hell I assume he's there. There's not, though, so I can only take comfort from the fact that the world is now a very slightly better place.
And you're not exactly the model of reasonable forum behavior. Then again, that might be more down to your opinions than the delivery.
You didn't even come close to addressing my point.
Brilliant logic there. You don't know much about him, so A) he must not have had much impact, or else you would know, and B) the people who actually do know something about him don't matter.
Thanks, I thought it was pretty brilliant myself. Seeing as how I pay a reasonable amount of attention to politics in this country if he was anything of note I would know a bit more of him. If he was some fringe idiot who was just a blogger with an opinion, well those kind of tools are everywhere. This board included.
he was central in the faked footage which lead to Acorn being defunded unfairly, and he edited footage of Shirely Sherrod to make her look racist when she was saying the opposite of what it was implied she did, she was sacked by the Obama admin over it.
He did have an impact but the man was everything that is wrong with US politics.
but he was not anyone of note though....or CR would have known who he was
Seeing as how I pay a reasonable amount of attention to politics in this country if he was anything of note I would know a bit more of him.
he was central in the faked footage which lead to Acorn being defunded unfairly, and he edited footage of Shirely Sherrod to make her look racist when she was saying the opposite of what it was implied she did, she was sacked by the Obama admin over it.
He did have an impact but the man was everything that is wrong with US politics.
but he was not anyone of note though....or CR would have known who he was
Tell me if I'm wrong here because I might be but didn't he only take a short clip? Not faked footage. So at most the comment was taken out of context by the footage. And I think he later said he never wanted her to get fired and was sorry she lost her job. I seem to remember the talk being Obama acted too quickly. Again, I could be wrong. And as for ACORN, I'm not sorry they lost funding by the govt. They were more than capable to get private funding. ACORN had big problems with the way it was conducting operations. It wasn't just one office that got nailed.
Yes you're right. He was clearly the most powerful man in government.
Tell me if I'm wrong here because I might be but didn't he only take a short clip? Not faked footage. So at most the comment was taken out of context by the footage. And I think he later said he never wanted her to get fired and was sorry she lost her job. I seem to remember the talk being Obama acted too quickly. Again, I could be wrong. And as for ACORN, I'm not sorry they lost funding by the govt. They were more than capable to get private funding. ACORN had big problems with the way it was conducting operations. It wasn't just one office that got nailed.
Yes you're right. He was clearly the most powerful man in government.
Joe Arpaio: Barack Obama birth proof 'may be forged'
Barack Obama could well be a forgery, a high-profile Arizona sheriff has said.
Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County - who styles himself as America's toughest - unveiled the results of a probe into the origins of the document.
His investigators found "probable cause" the certificate may have been made by "forgery and fraud", he said.
Mr Arpaio, known for his tough stance on immigration, is being investigated over allegations of racial profiling.
The US justice department alleges that his office routinely discriminated against Latinos.
He also faces a federal grand jury investigation into the activities of his anti-corruption unit, and a forthcoming re-election bid in Maricopa County.
Tea Party request
Announcing the findings of his volunteer "Cold Case Posse", Mr Arpaio, 79, said analysis of an electronic copy of Mr Obama's birth certificate had revealed strong doubts about its authenticity.
"Based on all of the evidence presented and investigated I cannot in good faith report to you that these documents are authentic," Mr Arpaio said.
"My investigators believe that the long-form birth certificate was manufactured electronically and that it did not originate in a paper format as claimed by the White House."
The White House released Mr Obama's long-form birth certificate in April 2011 amid persistent speculation that he was not born in the US.
That would make Mr Obama, whose father is Kenyan, ineligible to hold the office of president.
The release of the birth certificate appeared to placate some so-called "birthers", among them businessman and reality TV star Donald Trump, who had publicly called for greater clarity.
But Mr Arpaio said he had begun an investigation during 2011 after requests from Arizona Tea Party members.
According the sheriff, the investigators compared the electronic copy of Mr Obama's birth certificate with one known to be genuine.
The conclusion that "probable cause" existed warranted a criminal investigation and greater scrutiny of presidential candidates, Mr Arpaio said.
"If nothing else comes out of the investigation… what we have learned, we need a better process to vet people running for president of the United States of America," he said.
Critics have suggested that Mr Arpaio launched his probe into Mr Obama's birth certificate to distract attention from his legal wrangles, as well as to aid his upcoming re-election bid.
But the sheriff denied those accusations, telling reporters at his news conference on Thursday: "I'm not going after Obama. I'm just doing my job."
Critics have suggested that Mr Arpaio launched his probe into Mr Obama's birth certificate to distract attention from his legal wrangles, as well as to aid his upcoming re-election bid.
But the sheriff denied those accusations, telling reporters at his news conference on Thursday: "I'm not going after Obama. I'm just doing my job."
His death shouldn't be celebrated, but mourning it isn't required either.
Yes you're right. He was clearly the most powerful man in government.
Yeah, what part of the Federal Elections Commission's authority devolves to the Maricopa County Sheriff's authority, again?
What a buffoon.
"I'm more than willing to go off decorum to ensure THIS MAN is not beatified,” Breitbart wrote. “Sorry, he destroyed lives. And he knew it."
Breitbart would have wanted his opponents to celebrate his death - he after all only hours after Ted Kennedy died said this....
So yeah....he deserves no better.