US Presidential Election: Tuesday November 6th, 2012

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe he's happy the guy is dead because he claimed to be a journalist but made a career out of doctoring his footage to paint people HE disagreed with in the worst possible light, ruining peoples' lives, destroying entire organizations for the horrible crime of trying to help poor people vote?

Do you actually know who Andrew Breitbart was or did you just feel this was a great opportunity to to play the scold?

He had the courage of his convictions, I didn't always agree with his methods but no decent man would revel in his death.
 
Doesn't mean he wasn't a scumbag, and I'm not so sure that most scumbags don't realize exactly what they're doing. If he was just manipulating people's feelings with what amounted to propaganda, people should feel free to hate him.

I'm agnostic, so I personally don't really think much of someone dying, but I do try not to be inflammatory.
 
He had the courage of his convictions, I didn't always agree with his methods but no decent man would revel in his death.

I agree, but he's brought the criticism ultimately upon himself. Much like the media he so hated, he eschewed truth for the sake of his opinion but to an even greater extent in many cases. Had he gone about his business honestly, rather than framing others he'd have been less despised. As it stands, he was little more than a yellow journalist. He and Drudge are a large reason why anything that disagrees with the right is LIBERAL MEDIA BIAS!!! No doubt there is bias in the media, but the remedy isn't being biased in the opposite direction. By creating such an environment, discourse becomes very difficult because facts and truth are thrown out while opinion rules--no matter how wrong. Liberals assume that all conservative arguments are wingnut theories and vice versa.

His death shouldn't be celebrated, but mourning it isn't required either.
 
I only know a little about Brieitbart. Seems like a right wing bomb thrower.

right then. you are excused.

Exactly. So it means his influence was small if not non existent. And it also means he really only affected libs like you by pissing them off.

Brilliant logic there. You don't know much about him, so A) he must not have had much impact, or else you would know, and B) the people who actually do know something about him don't matter.

He had the courage of his convictions, I didn't always agree with his methods but no decent man would revel in his death.

Right, he had such strong convictions that he was willing to lie about the people he was supposedly reporting on in order to misrepresent their views and statements. How courageous.
 
Right, he had such strong convictions that he was willing to lie about the people he was supposedly reporting on in order to misrepresent their views and statements. How courageous.

What point are you trying to make? I have said I disagreed with some of his methods, I imagine he saw them as a means to an end. We weren't discussing whether he was an ethical journalist, I merely pointed out that it was remarkably undignified to revel in the death of another man. You seem to think that it's perfectly fine as long as he's a conservative pundit with a chequered history.
 
What point are you trying to make? I have said I disagreed with some of his methods, I imagine he saw them as a means to an end.

If the end is "my views are the ones accepted by society at large", killing everyone who opposes those views is a means to that end. If I attempted those means, I would be rightly vilified, and my early death surely celebrated.

If you don't feel the means of publicly assassinating the character of those he disagreed with through dishonest means rises to the level of righteous vilification, that's your opinion, but commenting how "idiotic", "crass", and "undignified" people who disagree with you are for saying unkind things about someone they disagree with is a shocking bit of naked hypocrisy.
 
What point are you trying to make? I have said I disagreed with some of his methods, I imagine he saw them as a means to an end. We weren't discussing whether he was an ethical journalist, I merely pointed out that it was remarkably undignified to revel in the death of another man. You seem to think that it's perfectly fine as long as he's a conservative pundit with a chequered history.

I repeat.
 
What point are you trying to make? I have said I disagreed with some of his methods, I imagine he saw them as a means to an end. We weren't discussing whether he was an ethical journalist, I merely pointed out that it was remarkably undignified to revel in the death of another man. You seem to think that it's perfectly fine as long as he's a conservative pundit with a chequered history.

There are many people I would be pleased to see go. It's not like I would actively work towards or wish for their death, but I won't shed a tear, nor will I hold back in my criticism just because they are now dead.

Bottom line is, the world is probably a better place without this jackass.

Other people on the list: Ratzinger, Dick Cheney, al-Assad, etc.
 
What point are you trying to make? I have said I disagreed with some of his methods, I imagine he saw them as a means to an end. We weren't discussing whether he was an ethical journalist, I merely pointed out that it was remarkably undignified to revel in the death of another man. You seem to think that it's perfectly fine as long as he's a conservative pundit with a chequered history.

So just because people are like that with this particular guy, for explicitly stated reasons, you then take that to mean "a conservative pundit with a chequered history"? You're the only one saying such a thing.
 
There are many people I would be pleased to see go. It's not like I would actively work towards or wish for their death, but I won't shed a tear, nor will I hold back in my criticism just because they are now dead.

Bottom line is, the world is probably a better place without this jackass.

Other people on the list: Ratzinger, Dick Cheney, al-Assad, etc.

There's a difference between dignified criticism and tasteless comments like: "Pleased he's rotting in hell". Still, it's a forum for opinions and if that's how people want to conduct themselves then I cannot stop them.
 
There's a difference between dignified criticism and tasteless comments like: "Pleased he's rotting in hell". Still, it's a forum for opinions and if that's how people want to conduct themselves then I cannot stop them.

Well if there is a hell I assume he's there. There's not, though, so I can only take comfort from the fact that the world is now a very slightly better place.

And you're not exactly the model of reasonable forum behavior. Then again, that might be more down to your opinions than the delivery.
 
CR... you do this all the time. To prove that a lefty is just as bad by mentioning someone from the left like Moore. The truth is Moore is not a scum like this guy from the right....who made up lies so someone lost a job and made up lies so an organization that helped poor people vote is gone,are the same

Just like you keep saying the Dems are as bad as the GOP..
 
Well if there is a hell I assume he's there. There's not, though, so I can only take comfort from the fact that the world is now a very slightly better place.

And you're not exactly the model of reasonable forum behavior. Then again, that might be more down to your opinions than the delivery.

You have no idea what my opinions are, you barely bother to digest them before mindlessly interpreting them as sinister. You could give Breitbart a run for his money when it comes to selective quoting and taking comments out of context!
 
Brilliant logic there. You don't know much about him, so A) he must not have had much impact, or else you would know, and B) the people who actually do know something about him don't matter.

Thanks, I thought it was pretty brilliant myself. Seeing as how I pay a reasonable amount of attention to politics in this country if he was anything of note I would know a bit more of him. If he was some fringe idiot who was just a blogger with an opinion, well those kind of tools are everywhere. This board included.
 
Thanks, I thought it was pretty brilliant myself. Seeing as how I pay a reasonable amount of attention to politics in this country if he was anything of note I would know a bit more of him. If he was some fringe idiot who was just a blogger with an opinion, well those kind of tools are everywhere. This board included.

he was central in the faked footage which lead to Acorn being defunded unfairly, and he edited footage of Shirely Sherrod to make her look racist when she was saying the opposite of what it was implied she did, she was sacked by the Obama admin over it.

He did have an impact but the man was everything that is wrong with US politics.
 
he was central in the faked footage which lead to Acorn being defunded unfairly, and he edited footage of Shirely Sherrod to make her look racist when she was saying the opposite of what it was implied she did, she was sacked by the Obama admin over it.

He did have an impact but the man was everything that is wrong with US politics.

but he was not anyone of note though....or CR would have known who he was :D
 
but he was not anyone of note though....or CR would have known who he was :D

He also recently claimed to have video of Obama at college as said he would be using it to show how radical he was.. I imagine we will still see these heavily edited, out-of-context videos at election time. He's set up the organisation and made the blueprint for this strategy, I expect it to continue
 
he was central in the faked footage which lead to Acorn being defunded unfairly, and he edited footage of Shirely Sherrod to make her look racist when she was saying the opposite of what it was implied she did, she was sacked by the Obama admin over it.

He did have an impact but the man was everything that is wrong with US politics.

Tell me if I'm wrong here because I might be but didn't he only take a short clip? Not faked footage. So at most the comment was taken out of context by the footage. And I think he later said he never wanted her to get fired and was sorry she lost her job. I seem to remember the talk being Obama acted too quickly. Again, I could be wrong. And as for ACORN, I'm not sorry they lost funding by the govt. They were more than capable to get private funding. ACORN had big problems with the way it was conducting operations. It wasn't just one office that got nailed.


but he was not anyone of note though....or CR would have known who he was :D

Yes you're right. He was clearly the most powerful man in government.
 
Tell me if I'm wrong here because I might be but didn't he only take a short clip? Not faked footage. So at most the comment was taken out of context by the footage. And I think he later said he never wanted her to get fired and was sorry she lost her job. I seem to remember the talk being Obama acted too quickly. Again, I could be wrong. And as for ACORN, I'm not sorry they lost funding by the govt. They were more than capable to get private funding. ACORN had big problems with the way it was conducting operations. It wasn't just one office that got nailed.




Yes you're right. He was clearly the most powerful man in government.

you really are making yourself silly with this post CR....
 
Tell me if I'm wrong here because I might be but didn't he only take a short clip? Not faked footage. So at most the comment was taken out of context by the footage. And I think he later said he never wanted her to get fired and was sorry she lost her job. I seem to remember the talk being Obama acted too quickly. Again, I could be wrong. And as for ACORN, I'm not sorry they lost funding by the govt. They were more than capable to get private funding. ACORN had big problems with the way it was conducting operations. It wasn't just one office that got nailed.




Yes you're right. He was clearly the most powerful man in government.

he took what she said, turned it on its head and put it up on his website where is was picked up by Fox News. Obama was very weak on the issue but there is no excuse for what Brietbart did, whether he pretended to be sorry or not.

The Acorn footage with James O'keefe was taken out of context again (edit- there was also some overdubbing of voices according to actual investigations if I remember right), the woman working for Acorn didn't offer any help to the 'pimp' and the authorities were called. Obviously this wasn't told to the audience. Acorn have been not been found guilty of any wrongdoing as an organisation, they found that a few workers had tried registering faked names in order to get a bonus but they were caught and fired.

Do you really think providing legal or financial advice and registering poor people to vote is a service that is sustainable without government support?
 
^ I, for one am rejoicing at the death of that scumbag.

On to other news...Sheriff Joe has spoken people...Obama is in trouble :rolleyes:

Joe Arpaio: Barack Obama birth proof 'may be forged'


Barack Obama could well be a forgery, a high-profile Arizona sheriff has said.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County - who styles himself as America's toughest - unveiled the results of a probe into the origins of the document.

His investigators found "probable cause" the certificate may have been made by "forgery and fraud", he said.

Mr Arpaio, known for his tough stance on immigration, is being investigated over allegations of racial profiling.

The US justice department alleges that his office routinely discriminated against Latinos.

He also faces a federal grand jury investigation into the activities of his anti-corruption unit, and a forthcoming re-election bid in Maricopa County.

Tea Party request
Announcing the findings of his volunteer "Cold Case Posse", Mr Arpaio, 79, said analysis of an electronic copy of Mr Obama's birth certificate had revealed strong doubts about its authenticity.

"Based on all of the evidence presented and investigated I cannot in good faith report to you that these documents are authentic," Mr Arpaio said.


"My investigators believe that the long-form birth certificate was manufactured electronically and that it did not originate in a paper format as claimed by the White House."

The White House released Mr Obama's long-form birth certificate in April 2011 amid persistent speculation that he was not born in the US.

That would make Mr Obama, whose father is Kenyan, ineligible to hold the office of president.

The release of the birth certificate appeared to placate some so-called "birthers", among them businessman and reality TV star Donald Trump, who had publicly called for greater clarity.

But Mr Arpaio said he had begun an investigation during 2011 after requests from Arizona Tea Party members.

According the sheriff, the investigators compared the electronic copy of Mr Obama's birth certificate with one known to be genuine.

The conclusion that "probable cause" existed warranted a criminal investigation and greater scrutiny of presidential candidates, Mr Arpaio said.

"If nothing else comes out of the investigation… what we have learned, we need a better process to vet people running for president of the United States of America," he said.

Critics have suggested that Mr Arpaio launched his probe into Mr Obama's birth certificate to distract attention from his legal wrangles, as well as to aid his upcoming re-election bid.

But the sheriff denied those accusations, telling reporters at his news conference on Thursday: "I'm not going after Obama. I'm just doing my job."
 
Critics have suggested that Mr Arpaio launched his probe into Mr Obama's birth certificate to distract attention from his legal wrangles, as well as to aid his upcoming re-election bid.

But the sheriff denied those accusations, telling reporters at his news conference on Thursday: "I'm not going after Obama. I'm just doing my job."

Yeah, what part of the Federal Elections Commission's authority devolves to the Maricopa County Sheriff's authority, again?

What a buffoon.
 
Yes you're right. He was clearly the most powerful man in government.

First evra, and now you? What is it with your arguments that means you have to credit people with blatantly false statements like that? Is it just so you can then go "hah, he's not the most powerful man in government; that is President Obama, so I was right and you were wrong"?

Really clever.
 
Breitbart would have wanted his opponents to celebrate his death - he after all only hours after Ted Kennedy died said this....

"I'm more than willing to go off decorum to ensure THIS MAN is not beatified,” Breitbart wrote. “Sorry, he destroyed lives. And he knew it."

Screen-shot-2012-03-01-at-11.34.52-AM1-448x194.png


Screen-shot-2012-03-01-at-11.34.26-AM-448x217.png


So yeah....he deserves no better.
 
Did not celebrate his death. But glad scum like him are out of circulation.

He must have had an awful lot of scorn and hate for himself to have done what he did to that poor woman who lost her job.

I dont know the status of her suit against him. But I hope she succceds against his estate and drains it out of every penny.
 
Breitbart would have wanted his opponents to celebrate his death - he after all only hours after Ted Kennedy died said this....



Screen-shot-2012-03-01-at-11.34.52-AM1-448x194.png


Screen-shot-2012-03-01-at-11.34.26-AM-448x217.png


So yeah....he deserves no better.

Cringeworthy stuff, just like the responses of his own death.
 
^Yup, definitely not a case of people taking the high road - but he was just so hateful, it's not surprising that his death has been met with this sort of reaction.

Not proud of it myself, but there you are.
 
Santorum has a 13k lead but apparently Cleveland isn't reporting yet. Most of the smaller places will vote Santorum while the more urban areas should be for Romney. Same for Columbus and Cincinnati.

Could be interesting.
 
How the hell is Rick Santorum getting votes? I just cannot wrap my head around it. It is inspiring though, if millions think such a clear idiot should be president than impossible really is nothing.
 
Romney has this...or should based on where is left to report. (Ohio...which is the one that really matters)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.