Easy to say when it's not you. Look I don't say this in support of him but when you're being accused of being a serial rapist pretty much and have the eyes of millions watching how can you just remain calm and composed. People would talk of psychopathy and toxic masculinity if he just brushed it off like nothing, and when he broke down people criticised his emotional fragility.
Fundamentally disagree with that. There's a high profile judge very much used to the limelight and media attention, extremely well trained for situations like this. He's put in a scenario where either Ford is delusional and flat out lying, or there's a case of mistaken identity, or Kavanaugh himself is lying when he denied the incident ever happened.
Look at all the examples of high profile court cases where truly innocent people got convicted, preferably from countries where there's no jury involved. When you break it down more often than not they either confessed (usually being forced into after being mentally drained) or they've always maintained their innocence in a very typical and straightforward fashion - very different than the lines of defense Kavanaugh is using.
If this were some random guy with no judicial experience picked from the street reacting like that I might've actually agreed with you. But this is not the case with Kavanaugh. Ignoring the possibility that Dr. Ford was delusional and hallucinating during her testimony, it basically only leaves two options. Either it's a massive coincidental mix up with a case of mistaken identity, or Kavanaugh is lying.
Then we look at the facts and the line of defense. The key witness who could confirm or deny all of this, Mark Judge who was alleged to be in the room when the incident took place, is conveniently missing. Even more convenient is that his written statement claimed he 'had no memory of this alleged incident', which is fundamentally different from denying it ever happened.
There's the problem that certain claims Kavanaugh made yesterday while painting himself as Mr. Perfect have already been refuted by people who knew him, which would mean he was lying yesterday. There's him being asked point blank at least five times about an FBI investigation, to which he refused to answer yes or no. There was the all out and irrational attack on the Clintons and democrats to please Trump.
None of this makes any real sense as a defensive strategy from a truly innocent perspective, whereas everything fitted in perfectly with a man going all-in because it's the only hand he can play and has nothing to lose anymore. Which is very much the case if the incident really did happen.