Form is temporary, class is permanent.I'd love him at Chelsea. He is miles better than Hazard right now.
Last edited:
Form is temporary, class is permanent.I'd love him at Chelsea. He is miles better than Hazard right now.
I think he does and i would like that he would do because i think Wilson need a playing time and if we keep him we will not buy another striker. Wilson is currently recovering but he played a lot last season for a striker who is as young as him and i think he will be again in first team this season when he will be needed. Ofcourse all can change if a right player became available and we send Wilson on loan.
As for playing both strikers, we have Herrera and Pereira and even Depay to play in that number 10 position if one striker needs a rest. It a LVG choice to play both becouse both are prepared enough to play 2-3 times per week.
I think people really don't get this substitution. It is much more to change the shape of midfield from 2 DM and one AM to a midfield with only one DM, often if Rooney is AM with him starting to push more forward then before. Fellaini is capable of carring the ball forward, is quite mobile and can track back and win the ball back quickly after we lose it, is a great target man if we have a hard time to bring balls in dangerous areas and also is a great header of the ball when we cross into the box. Unforunately people notice just the last part.
This is the real qestion, is he worth it, how big chance does he have to succed or would he be not only a flop and 10m down the drain but also would prevent us to buy the player we wanted in the summer because we will already have him.
I don't think he is worth it.
I can guarantee that half of the people saying "no" have never seen him play other than maybe the odd game and MOTD highlights. Was very impressed with him at OT last year despite us giving Newcastle a bit of a drubbing and after the game SAF came out and said how impressed he had been with him too (although given SAF's record in his last few years with signings may or may not be a good thing!)
Everybody had a similar reaction to Mane and now most would take him in a heartbeat. It's not always the case that we need to sign "names" for them to bring something
So basically every player who we have not bought and has been bought by other teams? Or are you only referring to Pedro?If it's actually true (and not the usual 'exclusive' shit papers put) then I trust the manager. Frankly I don't think he is that great but I have been pleasantly surprised at our success in transfers (Martial, Rojo, Blind, Darmian), at least players who wanted to be here (before people put valdes and Di Maria). And happy in a way that players we chose not to buy are struggling elsewhere.
Presume you have watched him in every game then, he's not good enough. no more bench warmers or "back-up" players or squad fillers. We have enough youngsters who are at least as good as him
OK looks like Neymar it is then.....seriously though I would always take a young, hungry talented player over a "name" any day of the week. I can't agree that we have "enough youngsters who are at least as good" because other than Martial and arguably Depay I don't see any attackers his age in our squad who are playing to his level week in week out in the PL
So basically every player who we have not bought and has been bought by other teams? Or are you only referring to Pedro?
Must haves by who? The media kept linking us with anyone Dutch and the posters on here dreaded it on the whole. Falcao was never ever wanted to be a permanent signing after last year's loan and the jury is out on Firminio just like it is for Memphis. Pedro is a very good player in a Chelsea team struggling as a whole, just like we did under Moyes.Pedro, Firmino and Falcao mainly this year. And Last year we were linked with a host of Dutch players like Janmaat, Martins Indi, Clasie who were seen as must haves and I may be missing few other players too
I'm not saying that will definitely happen with Pérez mind. But Laurent Koscielny had played just one season in Ligue 1 before signing for Arsenal, and now he's considered to be arguably the best central defender in the Premier League with Smalling and Kompany. Santi Cazorla was a nothing player for Villarreal and was sold to Real Club Recreativo. In his very first season at Recreativo, he emerged as one of the best players La Liga, even won the Don Balón award for best Spanish player, Villarreal bought him back for 3 times the amount of money he was sold for, and he was a major contributor for Spain in 2008 despite having never played for the national team before. David Villa was playing in Segunda division before Real Zaragoza signed him, and he became one of the best strikers in La Liga in only 1 season, and Spanish international, and eventually their highest ever scorer ahead of Raúl.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that we can't just sign marquee name players for the team. We also have to think about improving the squad, getting impact players, goalscorers, and all of that to build a strong squad from top to bottom. And we could stand to taking chances from time to time if Van Gaal believes the player can help the team. That's all there is to it, provided the reports are atleast semi-credible, which hasn't always been the case under Van Gaal.
Really? Good on the lad. Spain seem really short on strikers though, especially now Costa has proved he wasn't the final piece of the puzzle. How about Aduriz and Paco Alcacer?who if reports are to be believed, is on the verge of featuring for the Spanish national team for the first time.
The Guardian seem to think there's something in it (Louise Taylor is an idiot though) -
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/nov/15/newcastle-united-ayoze-perez-manchester-united
This line is complete nonsense aswell -
'There are shades of Jari Litmanen – and compliments rarely come bigger – David Silva, Peter Beardsley and Matt Jansen about his three-dimensional'
One of those is not like the rest.
Not enough bling.The shiny new toy brigade don't like this one.
Why not both of we can manage it?Rather have Mane to be honest.
Really? He's not near Martial's level. He may be on par with Lingard but he isn't developed in Manchester United. He certainly isn't better than Mata or Herrera or even Rooney or nevermind, he is.His versatility, age and the fact we have so few attacking options mean he might be a decent buy if the fee is not too steep.
Really? He's not near Martial's level. He may be on par with Lingard but he isn't developed in Manchester United. He certainly isn't better than Mata or Herrera or even Rooney or nevermind, he is.
We MUST aim higher, especially when there are significantly better attackers on the market for the right money, there's no doubt about that.
Edit: If we're going to develop Pereira, we can't stack up with mediocrity in his positions.
He's not a bad player but if you are looking down the league for players to get in January there are surely other names you'd have above him in the pecking order.
Not saying he's good enough but he's certainly more talented than Lingard and based on what we are seeing on the pitch, offers us more than Rooney. To be fair, most players offer more than Rooney nowadays.Really? He's not near Martial's level. He may be on par with Lingard but he isn't developed in Manchester United. He certainly isn't better than Mata or Herrera or even Rooney or nevermind, he is.
We MUST aim higher, especially when there are significantly better attackers on the market for the right money, there's no doubt about that.
Edit: If we're going to develop Pereira, we can't stack up with mediocrity in his positions.