Wilt
Full Member
- Joined
- May 22, 2017
- Messages
- 7,443
Shocking new footage. Unbelievable they were allowed bail.
You know that makes it worse not better right?It's all about what his honestly held belief was at the time after having been attacked, colleagues incapacitated and somebody grabbing his holster.
Don't forget these are not run of the mill police dealing with a Friday night town centre.
People have a misconception that the threshold for use of force is this really high bar and based on what a mutual party would think but that isn’t the case. It’s what the officer believes at the time and how he justifies his actions and with what use of force powers were used. As @11101 said..If I was on a committee and he tried to argue all of that, I wouldn’t know whether to laugh at him or not.
You know that makes it worse not better right?
That a policeman entrusted with a weapon has THAT temperament?
The family probably doesn't have the money to hire anyone and lawyers of his reputation (from what I've seen in this thread) will either be smelling a payout and offering their services on a pay if you win basis or looking for the publicity the case will bring.On a side note, I do find it baffling the family decided to go with such an obnoxious solicitor now knowing what we do about what fully transpired. Heads deffo should have been kept down.
Were both of the female officers armed as well as carrying tasers?
If they were, it's not exactly a great look that a 3 vs 2 situation with armed police could have ended up with 2 guns being taken off the police almost immediately. Lucky one of them gets back up and gets the taser shot off.
Read it as wouldn't bother would've*
In an airport? It absolutely would. You aren't going to let a highly aggressive person loose in such a setting with any sort of weapon. In the US the first contact would have been the police shooting. Questions to follow. But around Europe and beyond, at the point the situation had escalated to such a point the risk level increased from an arrest gone wrong to a potential threat to the public. You're getting shot.
Even in the UK there are examples of a person trying to take a police officers weapon and lethal force being justified at that point. The UK is fairly reserved compared to even our closest neighbours when it comes to firearms so I've no doubt at all that the end restikt would have been worse for the guy elsewhere.
Where is this idea that guns were taken off the police come from? The police haven't said that happened and I don't see any evidence in the video.
The police in their initial statement said it was a scuffle and that there was a danger the officers could have had their weapons taken, as if to excuse any disproportionate response, but they never said it actually happened.
They weren't taken off them but the risk of that happening was huge. The fact you have two armed officers dropped almost instantly, there's the potential for the guy who punched them to the ground going for their tasers or guns. Luckily he didnt and went for the male officer instead. Also lucky there was only 2 people fighting, because a third guy in the fight could have prevented the female officer getting back up and using the taser to end the guys aggression.
It's not clear in the video but the male officer might have had one or both of the guys trying to grab his taser or his holster as they were fighting.
To be fair you’re entitled to free legal over here. He’d have been better getting that than this absolute chancer.The family probably doesn't have the money to hire anyone and lawyers of his reputation (from what I've seen in this thread) will either be smelling a payout and offering their services on a pay if you win basis or looking for the publicity the case will bring.
To be fair you’re entitled to free legal over here. He’d have been better getting that than this absolute chancer.
The ones arrested will deserve everything they get for attacking officers doing their job. The cop who kicked the guy in the head after he was down/tazzered isn't fit to be a gun carrying cop - although it would seem that the kick wasn't quite a premeditated and the original video suggested. Both things can be true at the same time.Deciding against posting again. Can’t be bothered.
It’s sad some want to take sides over this when there’s absolutely no winners here.
All of the footage is hard to watch for anyone with empathy.
I mean, you could *maybe*argue he had more reason to shoot him while being assaulted than he did for kicking and stomping him after he was tazed and on the ground. That's how wrong I think that was.If you view the seconds prior to the head kick, teal punches the officer from behind and drags him to the ground as he is tasered by another officer. During the fall, teal has his hand on the side of the officer around where his gun is holstered. The officer who has just been assaulted, could easily have interpreted this as an attempt to take his weapon.
Teal is lucky he was tasered, or he could have ended up being shot.
The fact you believe the above is the least surprising post of the thread.I guess given that you align with the same section of the public as Lee Anderson that makes total sense.
Deciding against posting again. Can’t be bothered.
It’s sad some want to take sides over this when there’s absolutely no winners here.
All of the footage is hard to watch for anyone with empathy.
What happened before they attacked the cops? Sounds like the cops were responding to another incident.
What a shit show.The rumours (not verified as far as I'm aware) are that the mum of the two guys attacking the police was on a flight to the UK and racially abused on the plane.
On landing she then pointed him out to the 2 guys. They confronted him. This confrontation then escalated.
How this then went to these guys punching police officers (if true) I have absolutely no idea.