Completely my own original take here and haven't stolen this at all!
Just as the Thatcherites and the Cameronites were the dynasty of finance capital, so the Borisites are the dynasty of the retiree. The chosen one of the retiree is not the Boris who submitted to parliament but the Boris who dismissed parliament.
The property owning retiree forms an enormous mass whose members live in similar conditions but without entering into manifold relations with each other. Their mode of living isolates them from one another instead of bringing them into mutual intercourse. The isolation is furthered by poor means of communication(Be it the lack of such things as the internet or the lack of ability to use the internet correctly), transport(Lack of public transport or they already own a car) and the semi poverty of the retirees. Their field of living - semi-detached homes, permits no application of science, and therefore no multifariousness of development, no diversity of talent, no wealth of social relationships(Rupert Murdoch plays a large role here). Each individual retiree is almost self-sufficient, directly paying most of their consumer needs, and thus acquires their means of life more through an exchange with tesco than in intercourse with society. A semi-detached, the retiree and his/her property; beside it another semi-detached, another retiree and another semi detached. A few score of these constitute a village, and a few score villages constitute Hartlepool.
Insofar as millions of retirees live under conditions of existence that separate their mode of life, their interests, and their culture from those of the other classes, and put them in hostile opposition to the latter, they form a class. Insofar as there is merely a local interconnection among these property owning retirees, and the identity of their interests forms no community, and no political organization among them, they do not constitute a class. They are therefore incapable of asserting their class interest in their own name, whether through a parliament or a referendum. They cannot represent themselves, they must be represented. Their representative must at the same time appear as their master, as an authority over them, an unlimited governmental power which protects them from the other classes. The political influence of the property owning retiree, therefore, finds its final expression in the executive power which subordinates society to itself.
Historical tradition gave rise to the english retiree belief in the miracle of a referendum that would bring all glory back to them. And there turned up an individual who claims to be the man of the referendum - Boris.
But let us not misunderstand. The Boris government represents not the revolutionary, but the conservative retiree; not the retiree who strikes out beyond the condition of his/her social existence, but rather one who wants to consolidate his/her existence; not the countryfolk who in alliance with the cities want to overthrow the old model through their solitary , but on the contrary those who, in solid seclusion within this old model want to see themselves and their houses saved and favored by the ghost of Empire. It represents not the enlightenment but the superstition of the retiree; not his judgment but his prejudice; not his future but his past.