TheGame
Full Member
About sums it up:
Good, it means that we can just get Brexit done. It's been on for too long, almost like the minute and a half it takes to microwave baked beans. It's time to get on with it, like waiting in traffic for too long we just need to hop the curb and drive on. Hurry up. Get. It. Done.
It's really simple, just like making any other kind of business deal. At least that's what me and my mates tell each other. I mean, it has to be simple right? If it was more complicated than that then it would mean me and my mates aren't smart enough to understand it, and we're not willing to admit that.
Jeremy Corbyn Eats Babies.This post is way too complicated for me. Could you please distil it down to an easily remembered phrase, perhaps three words?
Gerron wiv it?This post is way too complicated for me. Could you please distil it down to an easily remembered phrase, perhaps three words?
We are further along the road to North Korean standards for UK state media now.They’re an absolute joke.
What analysis is this? I understood the opposite to be true.I guess if the analysis is right that Leave votes in Labour seats are primarily drawn from non Labour voters then it still has the effect of splitting the brexit vote as much as it potentially does splitting the Labour vote.
We buy cars.This post is way too complicated for me. Could you please distil it down to an easily remembered phrase, perhaps three words?
I'm ok with the Mail having an agenda. Or the Guardian, Sky, ITV etc. But the BBC, a public broadcaster should only report the news - not create their own interpretation of it. There's dozens of examples of state news manipulating the truth over the years and none of them have been in nations you would call transparent.BBC uses old clip of Boris Johnson at cenotaph instead of video of his wreath gaffe
A three-year-old clip of the Tory Leader at the Cenotaph was broadcast on Breakfast this morning
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/breaking-bbc-uses-old-footage-20858947
I mean, this should not be a major issue (unless Corbyn had laid the wreath upside down), but it demonstrates the lengths the BBC will go to backup this Tory government.
Only thing Farage hates is not being in the spotlight. It’s clear to me he’s started to panic now that his party are dropping in the polls.I thought Farage hates the deal? He really is just a coward.
I find it funny when those on the right accuse the BBC of having a leftist bias.I'm ok with the Mail having an agenda. Or the Guardian, Sky, ITV etc. But the BBC, a public broadcaster should only report the news - not create their own interpretation of it. There's dozens of examples of state news manipulating the truth over the years and none of them have been in nations you would call transparent.
Only thing Farage hates is not being in the spotlight. It’s clear to me he’s started to panic now that his party are dropping in the polls.
Labour were never going to flip many tory seats with Corbyn in charge, so Brexit Party also not competing there makes little difference to Labour. Though it does harm Lib Dems.I guess if the analysis is right that Leave votes in Labour seats are primarily drawn from non Labour voters then it still has the effect of splitting the brexit vote as much as it potentially does splitting the Labour vote.
Posted at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/election-2019-50372495
Crunching the numbers - what does Brexit Party move mean?
Peter Barnes BBC political analyst
The Brexit Party’s decision to stand aside in constituencies the Conservatives won in 2017 should make it easier for them to hold on to those seats.
In marginals like St Ives and Mansfield, it ought to help them keep a bigger share of the pro-Leave vote.
However, to win a majority in the House of Commons, the Conservatives need to win more seats - not just hold onto what they have.
And in those places the presence of a Brexit Party candidate may get in the Conservatives’ way.
The best estimates suggest that 29 of the Conservatives top 50 targets, and 59 of the top 100, are in Labour-held seats that voted Leave in the referendum.
If the strategy is to target Leave voters in those places, it would probably better to have a clear run - without The Brexit Party.
Labour were never going to flip many tory seats with Corbyn in charge, so Brexit Party also not competing there makes little difference to Labour. Though it does harm Lib Dems.
Labours problem is still how to attract moderate centre left's with Corbyn's policies.
Another factor is that it may focus the election narrative on Brexit, which is generally seen as bad for Labour, who prefer to talk about other domestic issues.
I thought that too, looks like a bottle job. He's too lazy and fears another failure to run as a candidate and the Tories have told him to jog on so this is his only remaining play to give an illusion of control.
Also, Trump told him to start a pact with Boris Johnson.I thought that too, looks like a bottle job. He's too lazy and fears another failure to run as a candidate and the Tories have told him to jog on so this is his only remaining play to give an illusion of control.
Also, Trump told him to start a pact with Boris Johnson.
Not yet there isn't...There isn't a pact though is there? This is Farage acting independently it seems, could be wrong. Looks to me that the Tories wouldn't engage and he's saving face.
Not yet there isn't...
How is the UK media killing off all this russian financing of the Tories? I've seen next to nothing on it.
BeanzThis post is way too complicated for me. Could you please distil it down to an easily remembered phrase, perhaps three words?
How is the UK media killing off all this russian financing of the Tories? I've seen next to nothing on it.
Alexander Temerko 1.2 Million to the Tories
Lubow Tschernuchina 450K to the Tories
Alexander Lebedew unspecified.
Evgeny Lebedew unspecified.
Yes exactly - farage has been in panic mode since Boris became PM and claimed the Brexit high ground. Desperate to get a “pact”, farage is trying to save face as you say.There isn't a pact though is there? This is Farage acting independently it seems, could be wrong. Looks to me that the Tories wouldn't engage and he's saving face.
Did anyone seriously think Farage would stand a Brexit Party candidate in every seat?
Nigel knows the only way to be sure to get Brexit through following an election is for the Tories to be in power; however, they will lose some seats in the south to remain, so they need to make up that shortfall mostly in the north, they cannot do that without Brexit Party compliance.
Some Labour voters in the North with Leave tendencies might be tempted to vote Tory (holding their noses), but many more would vote Brexit if they could. Tories can now concentrate on their heartlands, Brexit Party will now 'home-in' on disgruntled Labour voters (and not just leavers) in both the North and the South who might have considered voting Tory if there were no Brexit Party candidate to vote for; now there is a clear signal, for Leavers in particular, but also other Labour voters who are not enamoured by Corbyn, on how to vote in a large majority of the Constituencies.
Of course all these 'tactical' voting schemes, leave or remain are OK in theory, but something else in practice, they all need a basic requirement to be effective and that is to convince people to believe they are not throwing their vote away. Farage started off with a make believe stand off to Boris, to try to avoid an air of over confidence, but now barely a week into the campaign he has been effective in his dexterity of shifting the emphasis; in not subjecting himself to scrutiny at the ballot box and now allowing the Tories collectively to 'stiffen the sinews and summon up the blood' and go out to fight the good fight, knowing TBP has their backs!
Love him or hate him, he is arguably the most influential Politician in the Country right now.
Corbyns anorak didn't go down well last year eitherMichael Foot was practically a traitor because he wore a short coat at the Cenotaph.
About sums it up:
Nothing wrong with a bit of diversity.I've always found the Trident debate really very odd. Common sense says it should be scrapped and the huge amount of money saved invested in better areas.
Can't wait to meet these guys again the run up to the election
Remind us all again how many seats Farage has won in his entire career?Did anyone seriously think Farage would stand a Brexit Party candidate in every seat?
Nigel knows the only way to be sure to get Brexit through following an election is for the Tories to be in power; however, they will lose some seats in the south to remain, so they need to make up that shortfall mostly in the north, they cannot do that without Brexit Party compliance.
Some Labour voters in the North with Leave tendencies might be tempted to vote Tory (holding their noses), but many more would vote Brexit if they could. Tories can now concentrate on their heartlands, Brexit Party will now 'home-in' on disgruntled Labour voters (and not just leavers) in both the North and the South who might have considered voting Tory if there were no Brexit Party candidate to vote for; now there is a clear signal, for Leavers in particular, but also other Labour voters who are not enamoured by Corbyn, on how to vote in a large majority of the Constituencies.
Of course all these 'tactical' voting schemes, leave or remain are OK in theory, but something else in practice, they all need a basic requirement to be effective and that is to convince people to believe they are not throwing their vote away. Farage started off with a make believe stand off to Boris, to try to avoid an air of over confidence, but now barely a week into the campaign he has been effective in his dexterity of shifting the emphasis; in not subjecting himself to scrutiny at the ballot box and now allowing the Tories collectively to 'stiffen the sinews and summon up the blood' and go out to fight the good fight, knowing TBP has their backs!
Love him or hate him, he is arguably the most influential Politician in the Country right now.