They're monitoring how close we are to destroying ourselves rather than them. The truth is out there.
UAP - Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon
- Thread starter altodevil
- Start date
No, I have relatives in the royal navy.
To the planet. To ourselves. Perhaps our resources are unique to this planet and so there's interest in preservation for their own sake. I don't say that nuclear is a threat to them, only to this planet.
There have been multiple instances of NHI's shutting down warheads over bases in the last fifty years. The testimony is out there from 4 star generals and the highest ranking brass.
Thank you. This guy gets it.
What is an NHI?
Yeah I read it. He's the one who first said that UAPs are unmanned drones made-to-spec and developed at a base under the sea off the coast of the United States.
It was really odd seeing all the witness reports recently from the NJ police saying that drones are repeatedly retreating to the sea.
Non Human Intelligence. It's the abbreviation used in US special access programs instead of saying alien because alien can't be taken seriously.
Cheers, I wonder why?
How do they know they're intelligent?
I don't know if anyone has seen this yet but it's fascinating. From this week ignore the writing in the tweet.
In Arizona, a drone approached what looks like some kind of orange orb. It circles it, then tries to engage it up close. The drone then has some kind of systematic fallure and crashes to the ground.
In Arizona, a drone approached what looks like some kind of orange orb. It circles it, then tries to engage it up close. The drone then has some kind of systematic fallure and crashes to the ground.
For those who haven't seen, a 1st hand witness has come forward as a whistblower, albeit anonymously as 'U.S. Navy X', and was part of James Fox's new documentary, "The Program". The whistleblower released the following first-hand testimony of what he saw whilst working in the military.
Maybe they are like galactic bee keepers, regularly checking on our nuclear weaposn to make sure we don't blow the feck out of our own planet.
It’s funny you say that, because I was just reading through the previously mention 4chan leaks out of curiosity and that’s pretty much how the supposed leaker described the situation.
No, it was the playing of Indian Love Calls by Slim Whitman om the radio that stopped it
Well they've been evading humans for about a century so that suggests they're more intelligent than us
Or someone's been rewatching The Abyss again
I'm losing brain cells reading this thread.
Of course we've all seen it, what kind of uncivilized rubes do you take us for!
Who has the most tin foil hats?
Arguments of the form: "This speculated motive/cause doesn't make sense, therefore the observation that inspired it is false" are fallacious.
The observation is the observation. Should we dismiss it simply because a speculative motive/cause for it seems ridiculous? No. To get at the truth, we need to first figure out whether the observation is true or false, and only if true worry about motives/causes. Arguing the other way is begging the question.
Reminds me of the trouble scientists had accepting the reality of meteorites a couple of centuries ago: Newtonian laws are 'perfect', there are no rocks/iron chunks in space and therefore the observation of falling rocks/iron chunks by 'illiterate peasants' - who were apparently the only ones who observed such things - cannot be true. Never mind that the Romans, etc. wrote about them (dismissed as superstition as they also wrote about blood, etc. falling out of the sky). Yet it was right there! If some brave scientist had overcome the social stigma to investigate the truth/falsity of the observation first, they might have found themselves on the road to understanding Solar System formation much, much earlier.
BTW, anything that can convert mass into energy directly, and deliver that quickly and to a small volume, however crudely, is no joke. Whatever your level of technology. cee-squared doesn't play. That weapon represents something about us, good and bad.
And who says NHI are from other galaxies anyway (billions of stars in the Milky Way alone)? Are they even extraterrestrial/alien?
Speculations:
It's less about the weapons themselves than about what these weapons signify (to us). E.g. Prof. Bob Jacobs' account of the Vandenberg AFB missile incident suggests NHI are demonstrating overwhelming superiority and control. Are these weapons your state-of-the-art? LOLZ. We can knock them out of the sky, or (de-)activate them at will across thick, shielded concrete. Bet you can't even figure out how we did it, can you? Ditto the Nimitz encounters: we can come and go as we please, do what we need to do right in the middle of your AO, and there's sweet feck all you can do to stop it. And hey! That uber-secured, super-duper secret CAP point of yours? Yeah, we know where that is too. Just watch me zip there after you tried to interdict me. Can your fancy jet even keep up? LOLZ.
I also strongly suspect we are mere nuisances NHI have to deal with - or keep an eye on - once in a while as they pursue their true purpose. They've probably been here, or 'nearby', a long, long time. And while they appear to have unrestricted range (undersea, land, air, space), we certainly don't. So our observations of them occur only within a limited set of possible scenarios. Which means said observations are not necessarily representative of the true scope and nature of NHI activities. Our observations are biased by our limitations and NHI posture toward us within those limitations.
NHI: 'Non-Human Intelligence'; because 'alien' implies extraterrestrial (from another planet in this or other solar system). That's an extra assumption.
I suppose it's one of the only explanations that would explain an advanced civilisation travelling across the vastness of cosmos utilizing technology that would break the laws of physics as we know it to visit a small planet to look at nuclear technology.
I suppose it's one of the only explanations that would explain an advanced civilisation travelling across the vastness of cosmos utilizing technology that would break the laws of physics as we know it to visit a small planet to look at nuclear technology.
I mean the first explanation for me would be that it's a load of bullshit but an interesting read none the less
NHI is a new one to me. Can’t beat an acronym for making batshit theories sound fractionally less batshit.
I mean the first explanation for me would be that it's a load of bullshit but an interesting read none the less
Most likely, my point was explaining it if it was true.
How on earth could you possibly know what their intentions are?
Guesses piled ontop of speculation.
Eye witness testimony uncorroborated by actual physical evidence which can be independently examined, is worthless.
Last edited:
Also, they could be time travelling humans, like from Interstellar. Also ChatGPT is an NHI. I guess we'll shortly need a new acronym which takes that into account. NFIs - "No Fecking Idea".
I don't like NHI, that acronym contains another assumption. These might be a form of human intelligence we aren't widely aware of yet, for example it might be people astro projecting or absolutely tripping their nuts off.
I'd maybe accept that if they were also buzzing all the non nuclear ways we could destroy ourselves. Maybe they should be buzzing bioweapon labs. Or buzzing the OpenAI servers. Or buzzing fossil fuel burning power stations. Or buzzing twitter.
one thing Mars Attacks got spot-on was how easily the aliens dealt with nukes
Yeah if they were really here and trying to stop us from destroying our environment and ultimately ourselves. They'd have given up years ago.
Please stop using NHI they'll think its catching on and somehow translate it to their batshit crazy ideas finally getting validation...
There is not a single one evidence of NHI in the whole existence, yet people still want to believe..how stupid race are we still, arent we?!
There's no evidence they don't exist either, so technically it's 50-50.
Have you heard of these things called religion and ideologies? I hear they are quite popular.
As beliefs go, wanting to believe in the existence of extraterestrial life is pretty harmless. Remember when the feds freaked out over the idea that civilians would storm Area 51 en masse and like 5 people showed up?
there's no evidence of that santa clause doesn't exist either, technically it's 50/50 too
Every time anything happens, anywhere, about 100 different people have caught it clearly in 4k on their iPhone. There's footage of it backwards, in slow motion, with some silly Snapchat filter applied.
Yet with these UHIFOs or whatever it's always one person with some 1990s phone camera who can't hold it straight or in focus, mumbling to someone else off camera and for some reason filming the sky half obscured by a tree or some buildings. Well I say for some reason. It's probably similar to that godzilla film where repeatedly ALMOST seeing godzilla helped keep the cgi costs down.
Why would aliens or any more advanced intelligence waste time flyibg a bunch of drones about pestering our aircraft? They'd either come have a look and feck off again, or just introduce themselves along the lines of "hi guys. We're here now so, you know, feck off"
Yet with these UHIFOs or whatever it's always one person with some 1990s phone camera who can't hold it straight or in focus, mumbling to someone else off camera and for some reason filming the sky half obscured by a tree or some buildings. Well I say for some reason. It's probably similar to that godzilla film where repeatedly ALMOST seeing godzilla helped keep the cgi costs down.
Why would aliens or any more advanced intelligence waste time flyibg a bunch of drones about pestering our aircraft? They'd either come have a look and feck off again, or just introduce themselves along the lines of "hi guys. We're here now so, you know, feck off"