Two more Matrix films announced?

Why should you need it to be something of an achievement to decipher? Do you need a film to stimulate your intelligence in order to stimulate your ego so you can sit in a coffee shop with your laptop open loudly discussing what obsucre novel they are clearly referencing?

It seems a little ironic that the same people that are arguing that this blockbuster is trying to be too clever for it's own good is also lacking completely on the subtle front.

Because I like movies to be subtle when trying to be cerebral. But as I said before... I loved Matrix, but you're the one looking far more into this film than anyone else... and claiming the vast majority didn't get it. I'm pointing out it wasn't particularly philosophical...and as Mike suggested you should read a book or something, if you think it was. Most of us agree it was a great action flick, with brilliant effects and a decent storyline...whereas the other two failed epically. And that's it really.
 
But that's just my very point Mockney, why should it interest you? It doesn't and therefore you are part of the 99% I spoke of and despite making the point that it's a matter of taste rather than intelligence you still tried to imply that I was making out that the 99% were stupid and I was putting myself in an elite 1%.

Fair enough. I'm not telling you not to like it, I'm just telling you not to tell me I'd like it if I paid more attention...which you DID say (though not to me)

If you watch all the Animatrix aswell as actually make a point of understanding the storyline instead of switching off like a 9 year old with ADD because your upset Neo isn't beating stuff up on the screen, then you'll find that they have actually built a world and storyline comparable with some of the best Novels out there.

...

I suspect you don't care enough to read up on it and would rather call it shit because you have completely missed the "points" that are made but if you do I think you will be pleasantly surprised by how brilliant it is.

That's all....but hey. Sorry for being a bit over zealous.

First off, my post was soley aimed to illustrate that the film makes constant nods to the above philosophies, which it does. And that these thoughts are nothing new, which they aren't. Isn't that also what you're attempting to say!?

I don't really know what your problem is, ....

Sorry, I was having a go at the film (and I suppose the post) as opposed to the poster. Nothing personal intended...the 'dude' bit was probably a bit facetious, but it went nicely with the rant.
 
Fair enough. I'm not telling you not to like it, I'm just telling you not to tell me I'd like it if I paid more attention...which you DID say (though not to me)

That's all....but hey. Sorry for being a bit over zealous.

Aye on second read that doesn't come across well, what people enjoy is up to them though I think what I am trying to say is that perhaps you'd appreciate the craft of what they have actually achieved in terms of writing.

I have said time and time again that as far as blockbusters go I can understand it's not to everyones liking and it's definitely not an easy watch. I just think people dismiss it far to easily as "rubbish" when there is more to it than just an "action flick".
 
Remember that stupid long dance/sex scene in the second one? Man that was a shit film.
 
I have to admit something. I kinda like Keanu Reeves. He's done some good stuff. And some.. other stuff.

He's not actually human

tumblr_kwrwrcUFGV1qzm75ro1_500.jpg
 
Remember that stupid long dance/sex scene in the second one? Man that was a shit film.

You mean the one that beautifully contrasted the harsh orderly mechanichism of the machines that were soullessly heading towards them? :)
 
I think I actually liked the second and third one at the time, can't for the life of me remember anything about them though so I guess they were pretty forgettable in the end.
 
You mean the one that beautifully contrasted the harsh orderly mechanichism of the machines that were soullessly heading towards them? :)

Well if that was what they were going for then it utterly failed given how clinical and lacking in any energy the scene was. It looked like an episode of Ibiza Holiday Reps set in a novelty Santa's grotto, all filmed in tortuous slow motion.
 
Slow motion makes every thing cool Mike. When we're running a bit short for time, we should just end every scene with a slow motion walk away.

Sadly underwriting doesn't seem to be our strength. Write door dings.

Crazy considering some of The Events that have happens in his life. He should look about 90.

This is a positive thing for potential sequels, naturally. The problem of course is that Keanu is impervious to 3D. Being so one dimensional as an actor that an added extra dimension will only boost him up to 2D.
 
You mean the one that beautifully contrasted the harsh orderly mechanichism of the machines that were soullessly heading towards them? :)
No he was right with his description.

Man, both those sequels sucked.
 
Slow motion makes every thing cool Mike. When we're running a bit short for time, we should just end every scene with a slow motion walk away.

Sadly underwriting doesn't seem to be our strength. Write door dings.



This is a positive thing for potential sequels, naturally. The problem of course is that Keanu is impervious to 3D. Being so one dimensional as an actor that an added extra dimension will only boost him up to 2D.

:lol::lol:
 
This is a positive thing for potential sequels, naturally. The problem of course is that Keanu is impervious to 3D. Being so one dimensional as an actor that an added extra dimension will only boost him up to 2D.

:lol:
 
I do think anyone that dislikes a Nolan (written) film ought to be fired out of some form of cannon, it has to be said. Have been wanting to rewatch the Prestige for a couple of weeks but can't find my dvd (and am too cheap to pay £2.99 for a new one), which annoys me greatly.
 
WTF am I reading here? Inception shit, Dark Knight most overrated film ever.. Of course the experts here could do better.. :rolleyes:

Inception is overrated though, and a bit of a waste of a good concept. It's a good film though. The Dark Knight is a great action movie but not really one of the greatest movies of all time like many people say it is.
 
I do think anyone that dislikes a Nolan (written) film ought to be fired out of some form of cannon, it has to be said. Have been wanting to rewatch the Prestige for a couple of weeks but can't find my dvd (and am too cheap to pay £2.99 for a new one), which annoys me greatly.

I'm not his biggest fan and I always have a hard time explaining why. It's like he makes the audience think his movies are really clever and genius when they're actually not. They're usually action movies masquerading as something else.
 
Inception is overrated though, and a bit of a waste of a good concept. It's good film though. The Dark Knight is a great action movie but not really one of the greatest movies of all time like many people say it is.

They may be overrated by people (which lets face it happens with every movie) but they are still great movies.. Let's just say they're not for a second, theres no way Dark Knight is one of the most overrated films 'ever'. It's these sensationalistic comments that do it.
 
The Dark Knight is shit. Sure, it's not Phantom Menace shit, but shit it is.

History will prove me right, fellas. The only films that stand the test of time are those with a strong story/plot and an interesting protagonist. The Dark Knight's story is vacant, and it's protagonist spends most of the film mumbling

This disappoints me so greatly being that it was made by a film-maker who has the ability to craft mind-bending, clever plot lines when he applies himself.
 
I was a massive Matrix nerd back when it came out. I didn't hate the sequels, but they certainly didn't live up to the original. Haven't watched any of them in a few years though. May have to watch them again, now that I'm probably more neutral in my thoughts on the Matrix.
 
People I never want to be stuck next to at a dinner party part 3452: People who think the Matrix sequels are actually brilliant misunderstood epics, and that it's actually all my fault for not "getting them." rather than any lapse in genius on the film makers part, cos they're amazing, which I'd agree with if only I'd take the time to read an exasperatingly long post on the internet about all the wooly religious guff it's ripped from.

Films are more than just "how cool the story is". An equal amount of it's substance comes from the way this story is told. Regardless of how poignant and utterly amazing the story they were attempting to tell may have been, the solid gold nugget of truth remains that they told it badly. Hence the large amount of distain many people hold the sequels in compared to the almost universal praise of the original. Blaming the audience for not being intelligent/inquizitive enough to seek out things that can excuse it's quality and explain it's misgivings (which conveniently seem to always be in the form of "a post on an internet forum") is the ultimate cop out of cop outs. It's also rather insulting, presuming said audience must be stupider than you and have the attention span of "a 9 year old" for not seeing the obvious truth that you do.

It's laughable that it's even being proposed tbh. By all means claim you liked them, but to blame it's turkey status on other people's stupidity, or inability to "get it maaaan" or their refusal seek out the things you have is down right ridiculous.

In short, feck off speccy, they were shit.

This is easily the best post on this forum I've read in 2011.
 
The Dark Knight is shit. Sure, it's not Phantom Menace shit, but shit it is.

History will prove me right, fellas. The only films that stand the test of time are those with a strong story/plot and an interesting protagonist. The Dark Knight's story is vacant, and it's protagonist spends most of the film mumbling

This disappoints me so greatly being that it was made by a film-maker who has the ability to craft mind-bending, clever plot lines when he applies himself.

Yup. The Dark Knight is cack. Probably the best of the superhero genre (I can't think of a better one anyway, all the spider/superman films have been utter shite) but cack all the same.
 
Dark Knight is decent, that scene on the two boats is dumb though, as if they wouldn't have blown each other up.
 
that scene on the two boats is fecking dumb though, as if they wouldn't have blown each other up.

Yea, in terms of realism, this is where that film made me stop believing. I thought it was a documentary up until that point.
 
TDK was overhyped due to the Heath Ledger death and its as pure and simple as that, still a very good watch mind and miles ahead of any of the Matrix sequels.

The original matrix would piss over any Batman film though.
 
I preffered Batman Begins myself. I wouldn't call the Dark Knight shit though, it was alright until the ridiculous sensor thing at the end that made absolutely no sense whatsoever.
 
Can anyone explain why Dark Knight was 'shit'.

My main qualms were the lack of any kind of back story for Ledger's over-rated Joker, as I described earlier in this thread...

I'm a lifelong Batman fan and I HATED the Dark Knight, I thought it was basically just one long action sequence punctuated with bad, hackneyed lines. The complete lack of ANY backstory for Ledger's Joker was shocking - the whole premise of super-villains is how they fell from grace into the tragedy that consumes them.

I really liked the first Nolan Batman film, with the whole 'what would make a man REALLY choose this life for himself' approach. It delved deep into the psychology of fear and vegeance, which is what Batman is all about. And I was so excited to see Joker get the same treatment, but alas, there is no character development at all. Ledger was well up for the role and if there had've been an actual character for him to take on - rather than a 2 dimension, stylized husk of a 'baddie' - I think he would've nailed it.

And secondly, the lack of an enthralling, interesting plot.

Now, the first point is objective - Nolan breaks the golden rule of super-hero/villain character development and gives Joker NO back story at all, no one could deny that, but he has thus far gotten away with it.

The second point - the plot - is subjective I know, and it does seem that the vast majority of the public didn't have any problems getting into the plot, and even hailing it as a 'classic superhero' movie.

I've never found myself to have such a divide with the generally accepted view of a film before in my life, and I'm interested to see how people react to the film on second and third viewings. I'm not too sure the film will age as well as some might expect. But we'll have to wait and see.

Another poster asked me what I think is the best Batman movie, my answer, in no order...

Batman (1989 Tim Burton)
Batman Begins
Batman: Mask of the Phantasm
 
Now, the first point is objective - Nolan breaks the golden rule of super-hero/villain character development and gives Joker NO back story at all, no one could deny that, but he has thus far gotten away with it.

That was part of his mystique, he was supposed to be chaotic and knowing why he was chaotic would have given him a weakness because you could somehow relate to him.

He furthers this when he tells us how he got his scars:
My father was...a drinker, and one night when he was especially crazy. My mother grabbed a kitchen knife, and daddy didn't like that. No, not at all. He took the knife, and started cutting up her face, laughing the whole time. After he's done, he looks at me and says, "Why so Serious?" He comes over to me, puts the knife in my mouth, and tells me, "Lets put a smile on that face!"

You then think, "Oh you poor man, I can see why you are fecked up. That's horrific"

Then later he say's:

So I had a wife, beautiful...like you...who tells me, I worry too much, who tells me I oughta smile more. Who gambles and gets in deep...with the sharks. One day they carve her face. And we have no money for surgeries. She can't take it. I just wanna see her smile again...hmm. I just want her to know that I don't care about the scars. So...I stick a razor in my mouth and do this...to myself. And you know what?...SHE CAN'T STAND THE SIGHT OF ME! She leaves...Now I see the funny side...Now I'm always smiling!

After he said this you think "Wait a minute... you're just a manipulative c*nt"