Plugsy
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 6,584
Who will replace Suarez if he leaves? Even if they get Sanchez, he isn't an out and out striker.
Who will replace Suarez if he leaves? Even if they get Sanchez, he isn't an out and out striker.
Sky Reporter outside Anfield just mentioned that from unconfirmed sources Liverpool and Barca are in talks of a deal for Suarez in excess of £70m.
What the hell does that mean?
So one striker? When they will also be playing in the Champions League?What are you talking about? They brought in Lambert...
Who will replace Suarez if he leaves? Even if they get Sanchez, he isn't an out and out striker.
No idea, can't get the fecking thing to load!
Ain't a genuine quote
So what Scholes has suddenly turned Anti- United like Keane?
Scholes is my most favourite player ever and have huge respect for him but he needs to shut the feck up or start giving examples of other clubs if he wants to make a point. He knows it was Moyes here last year and now he is gone.
Is Tom McDdermott actually genuine? He seems to be a nobody and I've seen no evidence he actually works for who he claims to work for...
I'd expect one possibly two after the WC. There's a lot of players tied up right now, the Club will be looking at a few things.
Can't see Herrera and Shaw being our only transfers. I'm guessing we'll be going for a CB, another CM and a Winger before the window closes. I'd imagine we'll want to get the deals done quickly to help the players bed in over the summer and to avoid anymore deadline day drama (though you can't beat a good deadline day!)
Is Tom McDdermott actually genuine? He seems to be a nobody and I've seen no evidence he actually works for who he claims to work for...
Is Tom McDdermott actually genuine? He seems to be a nobody and I've seen no evidence he actually works for who he claims to work for...
Here is a working link: http://www.fifpro.org/suarez-fair-solution-is-still-possible.html
I'll copy/paste it.
SUAREZ: FAIR SOLUTION IS STILL POSSIBLE
Having reviewed the full report of the FIFA Disciplinary Committee, FIFPro is aware of the positions taken by the respective parties in the case relating to Luis Suarez.
FIFPro stands by the principle of fair play and the importance of upholding the duty of care each player owes his fellow professional. FIFPro reminds all players it represents across the world of the responsibility they carry as role models, a privilege which is magnified at World Cup level.
With his case subject to appeal, Luis Suarez has the right to due process. FIFPro believes all affected parties may benefit with time to remove the emotion, reflect and re-establish the facts in a calm and considered setting.
This is a very serious matter, as reflected by the sanctions imposed by FIFA's Disciplinary Committee. The sanction will be reviewed and FIFA will have to focus especially on the accumulation of sanctions including a four-month ban from all football activity.
The fact that Suarez is prohibited from working for a long period must be addressed as it directly infringes his right to work. Also the fact that Liverpool FC is affected needs to be an important issue.
Luis Suarez should receive all the support he needs to deal with any off-field issues he may be experiencing at this time. This means that the focus should be on the rehabilitation and serious treatment of the player. FIFPro believes that treatment must be a part of any sanction.
Luis Suarez deserves all the support he needs including legal support in the appeal case in order to achieve a reduction of the sanctions.
All affected parties will benefit from a well-advised decision especially when done in the interests of ensuring that he makes a successful return to the game.
Is Tom McDdermott actually genuine? He seems to be a nobody and I've seen no evidence he actually works for who he claims to work for...
He's definitely genuine, just not like Ogden or somebody who only posts finished things. Sky sports follow him on twitter so he's obviously not a bullshit account.Nope, thought it was found out last year that he hasn't a clue what he's on about. Sure someone working for one of the places he claims to pulled him up on it too, either way he should be on the blacklist.
He's definitely genuine, just not like Ogden or somebody who only posts finished things. Sky sports follow him on twitter so he's obviously not a bullshit account.
They follow him because he wrote an article for them about Reading vs West Brom, there's nothing else on there linked with them and him. He was pulled up as a fraud last year, he just jumps on other sources or pulls shite out of his arse.
He also sniffs his mums knickers.