Negative news seems to be instantly accepted as truth, regardless of the source.
Tweets Only 2010/14 Archive
- Thread starter KM
- Start date
- Status
Negative news seems to be instantly accepted as truth, regardless of the source.
Inter are broke anyway arent they? and plus there team is on the downfall.
Why would anybody want to join them? there the Liverpool of Italy.
Why would anybody want to join them? there the Liverpool of Italy.
Especially on the Caf, although given the last few windows that's to be expected.
Thanks for the breaking news from the ever reliable Football_Juice that reports suggest he will join Inter Milan. People seriously need to stop believing everything they read.
Agree, that is one shitty post, why oh why do people post from unreliable sources
Sorry...
This. We have the Lucas thread full of people saying there is no way we would ever be interested in signing Lucas for the sort of money being touted and rubbishing Daily Mail articles. However in threads such as Oscars after the Daily Mail report that he was signing for Chelsea people began saying how good Chelsea would be next year, and that's even after a number of people mentioned the fact the Internacional President said they hadn't been in negotiations with anyone over Oscar.
I enjoy being a bit of a transfer muppet and hoping against hope that we will sign a player like Lucas. I just can't understand people who post regularly in the transfer forum to tell people we won't sign anyone decent.
That was posted on the SkySports official Twitter.
When?
5th July 2012, at 4.04pm. I could be wrong though, just a guess.
If it's a repost, then I apologise.
I've been away the weekend, and it appeared on my timeline today.Christ, there's no subtle way of taking the piss out of someone for posting shit around here is there?
Clearly not.
There is this cool thing called money, Chelsea have a load of it and we dont. Just sayin.
A long long time ago unless it was done again.
This money you talk of, would it by any chance be similar in appearance and value to the units of payment we offered to Lille for Eden Hazard?
And besides that I don't see how that means tabloid articles regarding Chelsea should be taken as the truth while ones about United should be treated with scepticism?
Sky Italia: PSG have offered €65m for Ibra and Silva. The agreement has been reached. Raiola is in Sweden to talk with Ibra.
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/report-milan-accept-psg-bids-pair-185021635.html
There as well. Only waiting for Ibra to say yes now apparently.
http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/report-milan-accept-psg-bids-pair-185021635.html
There as well. Only waiting for Ibra to say yes now apparently.
Has it ever officially been confirmed by the club that we bid for Hazard?
That old chestnut huh.
Ehrm, Silva signed a new 5 year contract last week.
Ibra has mounted up a total sum in transfers that can only be challenged by Robbie Keane at this rate.
You really think the club will actually confirm a bidding for a player, whom we've lost out to?
Quite the deal if it's true.
Aye, the manager will invariably say we were interested in a player if asked, been done before. Ronaldinho springs to mind.
The club haven't confirmed it, but as KM said why would they. It was widely accepted that we were one of his options and Hazard has said he chose Chelsea over us and I'm pretty sure the Lille president confirmed we were one of the teams vying for his signature when the whole transfer saga was ongoing.
stfu up you!
Yeah well when Fergie says so I will gladly accept that. Anyway my whole point is I can see why people have this double standard when it comes to us being linked to players and when the likes of City and Chelsea have been. I don't particularly agree with it but I can see what they do it.
As class as Ibra is, it's a great deal for a cash-strapped Milan. I bet he's earning feck loads and is 31 in October. Of course, if they replace him with Carroll, the world's gone slightly mad.
Works out at just over £50m. I don't think that it is that great a deal for their two best players.
40m Euros and 25m Euros for Ibra ain't a bad deal at all. That money might help them rebuild.
Fair enough. I don't know who they can buy that will be as good as Silva or Ibra.
I can see where you're coming from in the sense that tabloid speculation like this suits the transfer strategies of big spending clubs like City and Chelsea more than United. Still don't see why certain people seem so desperate to believe other teams speculation while so reluctant to entertain the idea that United could sign a highly sought after player.
i agree.
that is a shit deal for milan.
ibra is a one-man machine in serie a and keeping him always gives you a chance in the league without question.
and silva is only 27 and a world class CB.
If i was a milan tifoso i would be livid.
Exactly. Even if they are getting paid a fortune, it is because they are fantastic. I'd want players like Pato, Muntari and even Robinho out ahead of them, as I imagine they would be earning a lot as well. £50m for two of the best players in their position in the world just seems a bit silly.
Again, why would Silva sign a 5 year deal and then leave a week later? Plus I'm sure the solitary bid for Silva alone was around 40-50 million. So they'd be taking a loss on the previous bid?
If true then Milan are retarded.
If true then Milan are retarded.
PSG is going to be mental, if this continues they'll end up trying to buy Messi and Iniesta soon
Again, why would Silva sign a 5 year deal and then leave a week later? Plus I'm sure the solitary bid for Silva alone was around 40-50 million. So they'd be taking a loss on the previous bid?
If true then Milan are retarded.
Not sure. Put value up? Get some clauses or something written into contract? Perhaps he's allowed to go if they bid again? Although if like you say this bid is lower than the previous one it doesn't make much sense.
- Status