Just another in a long list of examples of why treating a centuries old piece of paper as gospel is a bad idea.
Trump/Russia/SDNY investigation
- Thread starter Raoul
- Start date
Just another in a long list of examples of why treating a centuries old piece of paper as gospel is a bad idea.
Agreed.
Not many criminals with this luxury.
Soon to be followed by:
We’ve over-criminalised corruption
We’ve over-criminalised money laundering
We’ve over-criminalised bribery
We’ve over-criminalised treason
We’ve over-criminalised sexual assault
In fact we’ve over-criminalised all laws related to government officials.
We’ve over-criminalised corruption
We’ve over-criminalised money laundering
We’ve over-criminalised bribery
We’ve over-criminalised treason
We’ve over-criminalised sexual assault
In fact we’ve over-criminalised all laws related to government officials.
Mueller's prosecutors wrote quite clearly in the sentencing documents that the bigger crime wasn't campaign finance fraud but misleading the voting public over suppressing McDougal's story. If Trump had simply paid the women off with his own money he wouldn't be in this shit but we all know he wouldn't spare a cent of his own if he could help it.
Smocking. Maybe they haven't found the one he thinks he is guilty of, yet.
Edit.
Holy crap that second tweet is really something.
to the second tweet. The Newyorker summarizes every Trump plan ever.
I like the idea of "smocking guns" all the victims walking around in confusion wearing new smocks.
It's a death threat, he meant shrowding gun.
That or he's taken up embroidery. Which is oddly appropriate somehow.
There's something slightly unnerving about Trump's confidence that he believes he's done nowt wrong.
Minor his twitter rants he seems,when he's out in the open, controlled.
Minor his twitter rants he seems,when he's out in the open, controlled.
There's no confidence, it's all bluster.
More delusion and ignorance of the law than confidence.
"Smocking gun"...a real stable genius.
The amazing thing about Trump is that he keeps admitting to just about every allegation lobbed at him once it can no longer be refuted. It's like his Twitter is a long incoherent record of admittals. Perhaps his lawyers are straight up banking on Twitter rants being inadmissible in court.
He continues to out do himself.
He’ll probably claim at some point that he’s never heard of Twitter, doesn’t use Twitter and that Hillary has been tweeting all these things pretending to be him.
He’s trying too hard with those tweets. Literally spelling shit wrong on purpose the transparent motherfecker.
Smock on the water, fayer in the sky.
He didn't need to they have his tapes.
Feck.
What does this mean? Who is she?
Actually, there is no law or anything in the constitution that says a sitting president cannot be indicted. It comes from an old Justice Department directive (ironically when Nixon was in office) that has never been challenged in court, probably because no one expected things to get this bad.
She was a Russian spy accused of trying to infiltrate Republican political circles.
And also the "journalist" who first got Trump on record about his position towards Russian sanctions.
Which is why an indictment may still be used without an actual follow on prosecution or trial, especially since the statute of limitations on his Cohen allegations will have run out if he gets reelected.
Would you look at that . The heat is on for all of these people
She's on Putin's naughty list if she talks or not. She's safer out of jail probably.
These Republicans think everyone else operates like them
Exactly. They're so accustomed to doing as they please that they don't understand why others kick up a fuss.
I dunno... You would like to think the prison would at least search for novichok and polonium
Meanwhile, back on the ranch..
Is the Mueller investigation at all covered on Faux News?
It is covered on the non-propagandist shows like Shep Smith, Chris Wallace, Napolitano has also been pretty bleak about Trump's prospects.