@ brain scans. Just let everyone watch an episode of Mrs Browns Boys and anyone that laughs gets their vote taken away.
A great idea!
@ brain scans. Just let everyone watch an episode of Mrs Browns Boys and anyone that laughs gets their vote taken away.
Ah the Caf, everyone is an armchair political expert (yet called both elections wrong) and so far left it's hilarious, "everyone must be stupid, bigoted, racist, old, young, millennial" and on and on.
The far left is as bad as the far right, the inability of the left to understand the concerns of the right make them just as bad. Throwing around names, accusations and calling democracy out won't solve anything and actually encourages the opposite (often dangerous voting whereby far right parties gain advantages through no effort of their own).
FFS. The leftist in the election was Bernie. He spoke exactly about the same issues: jobs, trade (and also healthcare). Hillary is a (self-defined) centrist. Same with the remain campaign (centre/centre-right). If you like, you can group them all under liberals.
But that is distinct from leftists.
It's the quote of 2016. Will hopefully be looked back on with shame in decades to come, rather than being a sign of where modern political discourse is going.When Michael Gove said people were fed up of experts, I think he might've been more on the money than either himself or the rest of us realised.
How about not restricting the voting population and restricting the candidates based on their profile?
That's the point of the vote, isn't it?
How about not restricting the voting population and restricting the candidates based on their profile?
That voting population voted for Trump as the "Republican" candidate. He was voted in based on his profile, the fact that it was totally different from the established GOP. He blew them out of the water.
Yeah, restricting people's voting rights isn't exactly the progressive solution I was hoping for.
It's the quote of 2016. Will hopefully be looked back on with shame in decades to come, rather than being a sign of where modern political discourse is going.
No, even before we go for a vote..
There was actually a liberal 'progressive' making the case for this on Radio 4 after the Brexit vote.
Politics affects the immediate as well as the future so there should be no restrictions on the elderly IMO.
Read my post above. I am talking about restricting the candidacy itself.
That's fair enough but I wouldn't want them to mix with politics or have any influence in it let alone having the PM in their pockets
and most are. I happen to be quite versed with unions. They care about
their own interest > their members interest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>national interest
There was actually a liberal 'progressive' making the case for this on Radio 4 after the Brexit vote.
Politics affects the immediate as well as the future so there should be no restrictions on the elderly IMO.
What falls in between millenial and baby boomer? Cause I don't have a pension, and I'll be damned if I ever join snapchat.
After several discussions today, my honest opinion is that people are fed up with extremely passive liberal leftists who don't do anything.
I am a few years older (not many) than @Penna and experienced life before and after the EEC. It was not easy getting on the housing ladder then either, especially with interest rates much much higher than they are now and property prices were rocketing then far more than they are now.
More people own property now than they did 40 50 or 60 years ago. Council houses were sold off.
When I first bought a property I really struggled to pay the mortgage and we didn't have mobile phones, sound sytems, massive TVs, computers and all the rest
that people now take for granted. Just to live and eat was a struggle. The Uk was not a bed of roses in the 60s and 70s.
As you know I am a strong EU supporter and the problem is that the older generation remember the good things that happened but don't remember the struggles. It is more a question of education and not being able to distinguish between lies and reality plus people believing what they wanted to believe.
Even the immigration issue was similar then with resentment of the colonial immigrants of the 50s and 60s.
Nothing really changes, other than now it is more acceptable to voice one's prejudices
Generation X, we are usually described as the lost generation that got fecked from both sides.
Not saying I agree with the result. I think it has just come across recently that people want something to change. It's very unfortunate IMO, it's just been a perfect storm for nutters to take control.What do you think Trump will do that "passive liberal leftists" wouldn't?
The most obvious answer to me is start World War III.
I know it wasn't a bed of roses (I was born in the 70's), but the absolute explosion in both house prices and rents has had an extremely heavy effect. When people buy houses now they're taking on insane amounts of debt to do it, and the huge numbers who can't even imagine being able to get the money for buying are paying huge proportions of their wages in rent. There's a reason why they reckon this generation could be the first to end up worse off than their parents were.
I know it wasn't a bed of roses (I was born in the 70's), but the absolute explosion in both house prices and rents has had an extremely heavy effect. When people buy houses now they're taking on insane amounts of debt to do it, and the huge numbers who can't even imagine being able to get the money for buying are paying huge proportions of their wages in rent. There's a reason why they reckon this generation could be the first to end up worse off than their parents were.
What do you think Trump will do that "passive liberal leftists" wouldn't?
The most obvious answer to me is start World War III.
Some liberals aren't always great at being liberal. Elderly people of course have as much right to have a say in their country as anyone else.
Besides, one of the problems in the UK and US seems to be that a lot of people are disillusioned with the political system as is. Introducing restrictions that push the vote back towards the establishment would only increase that problem.
With regard to both sexuality and race, the Britain of 2016 is a far better place to live. I can't believe this is even up for debate.
Religion is a more complex dynamic, however, with certain prejudices having increased in recent years, and between multiple communities.
Things do look grim for young people right now but they looked plenty grim, plenty of times, for the older generation who have supposedly cruised their way through life without any adversity. For example, my parents had to raise a young family in the middle of a savage recession combined with spiralling interest rates and the imminent threat of nuclear armageddon. If you could put yourself in their shoes the future would have looked just as grim as it does for any millenial right now.
We are in a period of great stagnation, what happened to Japan in the 80s is happening in the rest of the Western world. I think that's why the outlook is bleak
Women's brains mature quicker than men's though so they should be able to vote sooner. Then you have the issue of intersex people, maybe some type of brain scan at the polling station to ascertain how developed their brains are?
Maybe brain scans for everyone is the way forward. Only healthy and mature brains of those under 60 should get the vote.
What type of profile do you have in mind?
We aren't on the same level of politicians or those, in Trump's case, running for political office. They are elite. Trump is a 1 percenter. The only thing I have in common with Trump is the fact that we are American citizens and we both voted yesterday. He can say whatever he wants because of free speech. And more than enough people believe in Trump, just like those people believe in Sanders or Clinton.
Some kind of intelligence test, maybe a literacy test, I think those worked well in the past and were never abused to suppress the vote.
...but that basically says, if you're not very intelligent, you're not allowed to speak up and have a say.
Look, I'm as devastated as the rest that Donald has found his way into power, but I really don't see how engineering the system through exclusion to suit our agenda is ever acceptable.
How about for starters, expect them to be dignified and not make the comments he had made over the last year or so.
I mean, if you or me made those comments we would be jobless right now...
Do you not see that's wrong.
It's not that it's wrong, it's just plain fact. He may not be a career politician, but he has money only people can dream of and most importantly, he's got influence and he built an audience. We're not born into equal settings which is obvious. The thing that made America so unique, for so long is the ability to climb the socialeconomic ladder upwards. It's harder and harder each passing year for millions of Americans. You see that with the diminishing so called American middle, working class with stagnant wages, increasing or unbalanced local, state and federal taxes.
I am not arsed by what is happening to the majority of the world because young voters are actually being progressive as their vote will show. The future will be better and this is just a step backward at the moment for humankind.
If not, the science community will leave them behind and we can create a better society in another planet. Reading everything about EM Drive, reuseable fuel and quantum computing, I am excited about the future. So, feck all these backward thinking, singled minded, bigoted and negative -ism individuals.
You dont get my point at all, do you??... People here are talking about restricting voters by age, intelligence, brain scans , etc.., I am saying why do it from bottom up, when you can screen these candidates with high degree of standards even before they are considered as nominees.... Does that make any sense??