If it's too harsh, maybe edit it out?
Fecking nothing. She said it was daft to say "people who menstruate" instead of "women", which it is. The rest of the stuff is just a bunch of frantic and ill-advised attempts to defend herself against the horde of cnuts who came along to score points by demonstrating to each other how offended they are.
It is daft though isn't it. Five syllables to two. Why?It's not 'daft' to say that, why do you care that it is phrased like that? What impact does it have on your life?
It is daft though isn't it. Five syllables to two. Why?
because they want to be inclusive. hth.It is daft though isn't it. Five syllables to two. Why?
Has nothing to do with feelings. It's a simple facticity. Women menstruate, men don't. If you had to try and define a key difference between the sexes it would be that and all the other minutia surrounding the birth giving ritual.Yeah who cares about people's feelings, I want to be able to type less words.
The LGBT community using it makes more sense but outside of that it's a stretch. You'd have to make the argument that the term is discriminatory when that's simply not true.because they want to be inclusive. hth.
She claims she supports trans rights, but then goes on to undermine that same claim. @sullydnl laid it out pretty well in their post.
In addition, she'll signal boost some very anti-trans opinion-havers, who generally don't try to hide their true opinions on trans people the way she does.
Maybe she just needs to have an open and constructive conversation with the trans community to understand these issues? My issue with Twitter is people seem to leap to attack very easily.
Just when I think I'm caught up with the current lingo something new pops up that has me running back to Google.I've a great admiration for anyone with genuine gender dysphoria who is genuinely Trans. However the Trans Activist movement has been taken over by a bunch of Auto gynephile narcissists who have a disturbing fascination with gaining access to women only spaces like female prisons and loos.
I've no problem with Transitioned women accessing such spaces. But some bloke just "self identifying" as a woman in order to gain access is just a perverts charter.
Just look up jess Bradley for instance or jessica yaniv for further info.
Yes, absolutely. If you've ever worked in an area that has to take precautions against the actions of sexual predators then some of what these activists try and claim access too is just ridiculous.Or Rachel McKinnon. Awful human being.
My general perception of trans activists (or at least the ones who desperately seek media attention) are that they are totally out of sync with the views of most of the people they claim to speak for, before you even get to their disagreements with the gay community and feminists.
TLDR Version- perverted sexual fascination with wearing women's clothing / spying on women, rather than a genuine desire to become a woman or feeling uncomfortable as a man.Just when I think I'm caught up with the current lingo something new pops up that has me running back to Google.
And we've moved on to transphobia. Cool.I've a great admiration for anyone with genuine gender dysphoria who is genuinely Trans. However the Trans Activist movement has been taken over by a bunch of Auto gynephile narcissists who have a disturbing fascination with gaining access to women only spaces like female prisons and loos.
I've no problem with Transitioned women accessing such spaces. But some bloke just "self identifying" as a woman in order to gain access is just a perverts charter.
Just look up jess Bradley for instance or jessica yaniv for further info.
You incredible twat.
Yes, absolutely. If you've ever worked in an area that has to take precautions against the actions of sexual predators then some of what these activists try and claim access too is just ridiculous.
Some are also funded by american "pray the gay away" types whose solution to the "problem" with being gay is to change sex.
I'm through trying to explain to your type. Perhaps shaming you with your own words might get you to adopt an ounce of decency.narcissists who have a disturbing fascination with gaining access to women only spaces like female prisons and loos.
But some bloke just "self identifying" as a woman in order to gain access is just a perverts charter.
Just look up jess Bradley for instance or jessica yaniv for further info.
sexual predators
perverted sexual fascination with wearing women's clothing / spying on women
I don't get the point you are making. Are you happy to endorse the behaviour of those people?I'm through trying to explain to your type. Perhaps shaming you with your own words might get you to adopt an ounce of decency.
And don't go blaming anyone else, you dredged all this up by yourself, it was not a reply or engaging with another poster - other than agreeing with that guy.
You brought up sexual predation and criminality in a thread about J.K Rowling's transrights twitter meltdown. And now you are asking me if I endorse the behaviour of criminals and sex offenders in the same thread.I don't get the point you are making. Are you happy to endorse the behaviour of those people?
Yes you made it explicitly clear what you thought about sexual predators and criminals within the trans community as well as your exclusionary views, in a thread about Harry Potter's mum.I am saying they are not genuinely trans, just opportunistic sexual predators jumping on a bandwagon and hoping to exploit weak safeguarding in areas such as education, prisons etc.
I don't use any negative language about genuine transexuals and have worked alongside people transitioning in a variety of different workplaces.
narcissists
disturbing
bloke
perverts
sexual predators
perverted
The only people I hear using negative phrases are generally the Trans Activists who like to categorize people as "TERF" and "cis"
narcissists
disturbing
bloke
perverts
sexual predators
perverted
You are a "type" that presents a bigoted point of view, conflating sexual abnormality, predatory behaviour, criminality and perversion with trans rights issues.Interesting that I am apparently a "type" rather than presenting a point of view.
I wish I could take it in good faith but the deception and bigotry in your posts suggests insincerity.Good luck with your own journey.
Eric Weinstein
I haven't read the rest if the thread but this post jumped out to me because Pogue is usually very switched on and I thought it was worth informing him and other members of the Caf that this wasn't some explosion of idiocy in response to twitter pile ons, it was Rowling coming out as the public face of Transphobia in the UK.She’s been the bottom of numerous pile-ons from people with strong opinions about trans rights for a while now. Which, I think, started because of how she portrayed a character in one of her books?
Hence she’s ended up taking them on. Obviously, nobody comes out of this looking well.
He's part of the anti-trans intellectual dark web but I listen to him the same way I listen to Joe Rogan, like if the subject or guest interests me enough, I'm willing to put a pause on my feelings about them and pirate the episode.Whats wrong with Weinstein? One of my friend watches his Podcast a lot. Is he a part of the Peterson crowd as well?
Someone who went to the university of MarylandWhat's a TERP
Someone who went to the university of Maryland
Saw it trending on twitter. This thread is out of my league.
I kind of feel the same.
Are TERFs feminists that perceive male to female trans people as men getting all up in women's business again, like some sort of threat to femininity ?
I feel the same..
TERF is a pejorative term for a group of feminists who think that the progression of trans rights will infringe on the rights of biological females so a distinction between biological and trans females should be maintained.
I'm being generous and accepting that overall understanding of the logic on face value.
Summed it up perfectly. They have a militant lesbian wing too largely because of the reasons you listed here but that is a another discussion entirely.I feel the same..
TERF is a pejorative term for a group of feminists who think that the progression of trans rights will infringe on the rights of biological females so a distinction between biological and trans females should be maintained.
I'm being generous and accepting that overall understanding of the logic on face value.
I think TERF’s main beef with trans rights is that they believe gender is a societal construct. A construct that suppresses women and benefits the patriarchy. Which is something that the whole concept of gender dysphoria goes against. TERFs want to get rid of gender roles altogether. Biological sex is all that matters.
The constant bickering about toilets and safe spaces is a bit of a side show to this fundamental philosophical disagreement.
They also don’t seem to like the word TERF. I’m not sure how they would prefer to be labelled.
North America also, those of two spirits were often revered within the tribes. Again the Europeans came across and that part of the culture has been lost.Summed it up perfectly. They have a militant lesbian wing too largely because of the reasons you listed here but that is a another discussion entirely.
Ultimately it comes down to trans people being some of the most violently oppressed people in the world, largely due to European colonisers and the weird pseduo-Christian morality they spunked all over planet earth. If you go back far enough, trans people used to be revered, especially in and around India. Now? Not so much.
Not sure it is about cancel culture mate, they probably just recognise that arguing about other people's genitalia is a bit creepy and weird but go off. Honestly I just feel sorry for all the trans kids out there who were big HP fans. Personally I was more of an Animorphs guy but each to their own.I think half the people in this thread being scared to have any opinion at all illustrates pretty well why I can't be arsed with all this "cancel culture" shit and the politics of being offended in general.