Transgender Athletes

I would be very interested to see if male snooker players had phyiscal advantages over female snooker players. Maybe in their cue action. Maybe i emphasize because i dont know.

Even in something like chess the males are at advantage.
 
Well if nothing else it's going to be very interesting watching the event from a technical point of view.

The clean and jerk should be pretty standard, but the snatch could be very unconventional.

I'm sorry.
 
I don't think there is an alternative which is fair, but life isn't fair I guess. Laurel probably doesn't consider it fair having to live in a male body for 30 odd years despite identifying as a woman.

Only thing I can think of is reducing testosterone levels required further? If that solves the problem I don't know. Gun to my head I'd probably ban MTF athletes competing alongside athletes born female, it's shit and unfair but maybe the less unfair choice.

I'd also add that those women who are competing against Laurel for Olympic gold have more than likely been through a state sponsored doping program most of their lives, so also not fair. I know our (GB) athlete Emily in the category is clean, but she won't be (although I'd love it if she did) going for gold.

That’s a bit of a stretch isn’t it?
 
That’s a bit of a stretch isn’t it?

Unfortunately not, Olympic weightlifting is full of state sponsored doping. I'd be amazed if 80% of gold medals haven't involved it over the past 20 years. China, Russia, anywhere Eastern Europe, old Soviet Block, or South American. USA and Germany are probably one of the only few examples of clean good performance.

Edit: I should add this I do (for once) actually know the subject, I'm a Olympic weightlifting lifter, coach and technical official and know many of the elite GB squad and Olympic squad. I've trained many times with one of Laurels direct competition, Emily Campbell. Emily and other GB women (Emily Godley, Sarah Davies) are hopefully showing promise in a clean system with some European medals this year.
 
Last edited:
Interesting to see Tennis brought up here because we had Renee Richards male-to-female transwoman competing and highest rank was 20th and no WTA titles to name. Never made it past 3rd round in US open (eliminated twice in the first round).

There's Cece Telfer, track and field athlete that right wing media I remember having an aneurysm over who hardly did very well either
https://www.outsports.com/2019/3/10/18257930/ncaa-cece-telfer-trans-woman-athlete-track-field

And a lot of trans athletes who compete lose too, and many just give unremarkable performances. They're hardly the unstoppable juggernauts as they're sometimes claimed or believed to be. There's a reasonable article here from a MMA woman's fighter who was previously against Fallon Fox competing here I found interesting
https://www.outsports.com/2021/6/16/22536714/rosi-sexton-mma-trans-athletes-fallon-fox

Its tricky because I think the goalpost isn't as often claimed "we don't want trans athletes to dominate women's sport". Because they've been allowed to compete for a while, 2003 in the Olympics according to IOC guidelines but instead its closer to "we don't any of them winning anything" at all as we're seeing now with Laurel Hubbard potentially getting gold (apparently tricky though since getting a debilitating elbow injury at the 2018 Commonwealth Games) and recently with Veronica Ivy's achievements in cycling.

I'm a 40 years old male, if I become a transgender tomorrow and face Serena williams, chances are she'll beat me 100-0.

Changing gender doesn't mean you'll be number 1, but comparing apple to apple let's say the trans trained since 10 vs a natural woman who also starts training at 10 the transgender athletes would still be ahead of the curve. And just because you eventually don't win the number 1 spot doesn't mean it's OK. It simply means it's ok if they "cheat" they never won it anyway. And olympics only have 3 medals for each class doesn't mean being 4th is meaningless for some.

Sorry to be pedantic but this isn't true and highlights why this is so complicated. A 4 year old male is not beating a 25 year old female at any sport, a 4 ft Male basketball player is not beating a 6ft 4 female player. There is a huge spectrum of overlap between male/female physical attributes and capabilities that are as varied as you and me (ie small, frail, hairless biologically male - tall, large frame, hairy biologically female and anything in between) therefore the most fundamental "base" separation in classification cant be Male/female.

To extend an olive branch, the "common sense of it" splitting male and female does largely group correctly over the general population, however it;

A: doesn't fit every case, therefore failing in its utility as a category especially in a professional athlete level were the edges of the curve are almost essential(human beings define categories for their utility, i'e they have a usefulness, they don't exist outside of social constructs in the vast majority of cases. we say that pieces of wood assembled in a shape we can sit on are "chairs" but chairs as a category of thing don't exist in the universe outside of our interpretation.

B: Doesn't guarantee a fair sporting event. If your aim was to guarantee a fair sporting event you would group virtually every sport into extremely precise categories. 18-24 basketball, weight range limit, height range limit, wing span limit etc.

Why do we enjoy sport, is it to gawp at freaks of nature destroying their competition? is it to try to determine who is the best based on work ethic? talent? intelligence at their sport? these are incredibly hard to nail down.

I don't know what the answer is, it clearly isn't allowing a biological male who experienced a full puberty, now compete as a female at the Olympics. But hiding behind Male/females categories also fails the litmus test.

The male and female classification is not the only one, it's one of the First thing you classify. When they finished with male and female, they'll move on with age, weight, etc.

Name any professional sport that only classified male / female.

We want to see determination, perseverance, strength, skill, mental fortitude, and probably bit of luck for the drama when we see sports. While not perfect the current classifications is the closes mankind can get, where players trained hard, and the eventual winner is normally within the same wave length, only separated by things that are beyond their capabilities to train and improve. In this system, normally (off course there's always exceptional case like Caster Semenya) players compete in a healthy competition where everyone that puts roughly the same amount of effort can compete in a similar difficulty.

We can never be 100% fair, but at least we tried. Putting a transgender against natural woman is beyond reason, it skews the curve too far.
 
Unfortunately not, Olympic weightlifting is full of state sponsored doping. I'd be amazed if 80% of gold medals haven't involved it over the past 20 years. China, Russia, anywhere Eastern Europe, old Soviet Block, or South American. USA and Germany are probably one of the only few examples of clean good performance.

Edit: I should add this I do (for once) actually know the subject, I'm a Olympic weightlifting lifter, coach and technical official and know many of the elite GB squad and Olympic squad. I've trained many times with one of Laurels direct competition, Emily Campbell. Emily and other GB women (Emily Godley, Sarah Davies) are hopefully showing promise in a clean system with some European medals this year.

Lance Amstrong says hi
 
Unfortunately not, Olympic weightlifting is full of state sponsored doping. I'd be amazed if 80% of gold medals haven't involved it over the past 20 years. China, Russia, anywhere Eastern Europe, old Soviet Block, or South American. USA and Germany are probably one of the only few examples of clean good performance.

Edit: I should add this I do (for once) actually know the subject, I'm a Olympic weightlifting lifter, coach and technical official and know many of the elite GB squad and Olympic squad. I've trained many times with one of Laurels direct competition, Emily Campbell. Emily and other GB women (Emily Godley, Sarah Davies) are hopefully showing promise in a clean system with some European medals this year.

We're gonna need some pics of your muscles for proof. :drool:
 
How many trans people have qualified for the Olympics since 2004 when they were first allowed to compete?
 
Unfortunately not, Olympic weightlifting is full of state sponsored doping. I'd be amazed if 80% of gold medals haven't involved it over the past 20 years. China, Russia, anywhere Eastern Europe, old Soviet Block, or South American. USA and Germany are probably one of the only few examples of clean good performance.

Edit: I should add this I do (for once) actually know the subject, I'm a Olympic weightlifting lifter, coach and technical official and know many of the elite GB squad and Olympic squad. I've trained many times with one of Laurels direct competition, Emily Campbell. Emily and other GB women (Emily Godley, Sarah Davies) are hopefully showing promise in a clean system with some European medals this year.

I know there is a lot of doping in weightlifting but that’s totally different than a born male competing with women isn’t it? There is a lot of doping in cycling too but it would be even more unfair if Lance Armstrong would go in transitioning and ride with the women.

It’s sad that it’s unfair and I fully understand that you want to compete with women if that’s what you identify as and in amateur sports I don’t see a problem but it is unfair.
 
There's a big difference in strength based sport rather than skill and stamina based.

Unfair to say the least.
 
Sorry to be pedantic but this isn't true and highlights why this is so complicated. A 4 year old male is not beating a 25 year old female at any sport, a 4 ft Male basketball player is not beating a 6ft 4 female player. There is a huge spectrum of overlap between male/female physical attributes and capabilities that are as varied as you and me (ie small, frail, hairless biologically male - tall, large frame, hairy biologically female and anything in between) therefore the most fundamental "base" separation in classification cant be Male/female.

To extend an olive branch, the "common sense of it" splitting male and female does largely group correctly over the general population, however it;

A: doesn't fit every case, therefore failing in its utility as a category especially in a professional athlete level were the edges of the curve are almost essential(human beings define categories for their utility, i'e they have a usefulness, they don't exist outside of social constructs in the vast majority of cases. we say that pieces of wood assembled in a shape we can sit on are "chairs" but chairs as a category of thing don't exist in the universe outside of our interpretation.

B: Doesn't guarantee a fair sporting event. If your aim was to guarantee a fair sporting event you would group virtually every sport into extremely precise categories. 18-24 basketball, weight range limit, height range limit, wing span limit etc.

Why do we enjoy sport, is it to gawp at freaks of nature destroying their competition? is it to try to determine who is the best based on work ethic? talent? intelligence at their sport? these are incredibly hard to nail down.

I don't know what the answer is, it clearly isn't allowing a biological male who experienced a full puberty, now compete as a female at the Olympics. But hiding behind Male/females categories also fails the litmus test.

This is flawed because all else equal and the male almost always beats the female. Why is this important ? Because it's an unfair advantage.

Now saying there are other unfair advantages might be right. Like Federer had a world class coach while my family couldn't afford bread but that's not something we introduce as a rule at least.
 
I know there is a lot of doping in weightlifting but that’s totally different than a born male competing with women isn’t it? There is a lot of doping in cycling too but it would be even more unfair if Lance Armstrong would go in transitioning and ride with the women.

It’s sad that it’s unfair and I fully understand that you want to compete with women if that’s what you identify as and in amateur sports I don’t see a problem but it is unfair.

You're right, I was more making a daft point about weightlifting being unfair in general, this is just another on the list.
 
It’s just daft allowing them to compete - it’s the whole you can be anything you want to be sentiment. Well, if you are a biological male transitioned to female that’s great, but one of things you’ll have to give up to do that is competing in some sports. It’s a shame but it’s just the way it is.

what’s going to happen if she wins a medal at the expense of a biological female? That would be awful.
 
What will be really hilarious is if she doesn't get within an ass's roar of a medal.
 
I'd only be for it if physicality didn't come into it.
Strong disagree. There's no sport that doesn't have some element of physical sexual dimorphism. Motor racing, horse racing, even darts. Whether that influences competing against same sexes is a different matter, but you can't have a physicality metric.
 
I would be very interested to see if male snooker players had phyiscal advantages over female snooker players. Maybe in their cue action. Maybe i emphasize because i dont know.

They already have to make the greens in golf smaller for females. One thing that caught my eye was Sergio Garcia saying that even if let women have an advantage against men with regards the length of the greens, they still would struggle with something to do with generating spin.

They make the greens smaller for female golfers?

Why on earth to they do that? If anything, that would suggest female golfers are better and more accurate than males. The would need to be better at generating spin to have the balls stop on these smaller greens. It also sounds like a groundskeeping nightmare.

Are you sure you're not thinking about them having different tee boxes for female golfers? They play a shorter version of the entire hole, but then so do seniors, amateur golfers, members, pros and various other categories of golfer.
 
They make the greens smaller for female golfers?

Why on earth to they do that? If anything, that would suggest female golfers are better and more accurate than males. The would need to be better at generating spin to have the balls stop on these smaller greens. It also sounds like a groundskeeping nightmare.

Are you sure you're not thinking about them having different tee boxes for female golfers? They play a shorter version of the entire hole, but then so do seniors, amateur golfers, members, pros and various other categories of golfer.

Yea it could be that. They make something shorter.
 
This is a simple issue. Transwomen (with an XY chromosome pair) should not be competing in women's sport. Putting transwomen up against biological women is trashing women's rights. If you see it as an issue of competing rights, then there are way more biological women in the world than transwomen. So biological women's rights rule.
 
This is a simple issue. Transwomen (with an XY chromosome pair) should not be competing in women's sport. Putting transwomen up against biological women is trashing women's rights. If you see it as an issue of competing rights, then there are way more biological women in the world than transwomen. So biological women's rights rule.
Most people tend to subscribe to this view from what I’ve seen, hence the controversy around the recent ruling that she will be competing.
 
It’s the tee boxes.

Their courses are shorter in comparison to PGA tour events, but the LPGA courses are still in the 6500-7000 yard range, which is long for what non-professional men play.

Cheers my bad.

What though was Sergio Garcia saying about spin? I can vaguely recall it. Something about the female players not being able to generate enough spin.
 
Quite different, I'm talking about doping at a state level, it would be surprising to me if USA cycling (or whatever they are called) would be th one aiding Lance in his cheating.

You have to be very naive to think that “marginal gains” and “more training” led to Sky / British cycling dominating and mediocre cyclists at 25 like Froome becoming GOATs.

It is a classical Western view, dirty foreigners cheating against clean locals.
 
Cheers my bad.

What though was Sergio Garcia saying about spin? I can vaguely recall it. Something about the female players not being able to generate enough spin.
He’s talking about the ball’s spin rate. The spin rate affects ball flight and the ability to make the ball stop on greens & roll different directions after it has landed.

PGA average spin rate for a 6 iron is about 6200 rpm while the LPGA average for a 6 iron is about 5900.
 
He’s talking about the ball’s spin rate. The spin rate affects ball flight and the ability to make the ball stop on greens & roll different directions after it has landed.

PGA average spin rate for a 6 iron is about 6200 rpm while the LPGA average for a 6 iron is about 5900.

Cheers thanks.
 
He’s talking about the ball’s spin rate. The spin rate affects ball flight and the ability to make the ball stop on greens & roll different directions after it has landed.

PGA average spin rate for a 6 iron is about 6200 rpm while the LPGA average for a 6 iron is about 5900.

Do you know anything about snooker? Would there be a similar difference in controlling the cue ball between male and female players?
 
You have to be very naive to think that “marginal gains” and “more training” led to Sky / British cycling dominating and mediocre cyclists at 25 like Froome becoming GOATs.

It is a classical Western view, dirty foreigners cheating against clean locals.
You realize that his original comment is being made about weight lifting, a sport that he’s already said he is involved with at the Olympic training level?

He isn’t who brought cycling into a discussion about weight lifting.
 
In competitive sports it’s dangerous. Ridiculous that there was a trans MMA fighter fighting women.

Putting peoples lives at risk to avoid offending people
 
Quite different, I'm talking about doping at a state level, it would be surprising to me if USA cycling (or whatever they are called) would be th one aiding Lance in his cheating.
You have to be very naive to think that “marginal gains” and “more training” led to Sky / British cycling dominating and mediocre cyclists at 25 like Froome becoming GOATs.

It is a classical Western view, dirty foreigners cheating against clean locals.

Read Tyler Hamilton's book a few months ago who was a team mate of Armstrong.

Basically they're all on it (or were at the time, probably still are now) and the smallest of percentage of gains due to PEDs would make a huge difference to them. Interesting book really probably pick it up pretty cheap now due to the amount of stuff that's out there about Armstrong.
 
Interesting to see Tennis brought up here because we had Renee Richards male-to-female transwoman competing and highest rank was 20th and no WTA titles to name. Never made it past 3rd round in US open (eliminated twice in the first round).

There's Cece Telfer, track and field athlete that right wing media I remember having an aneurysm over who hardly did very well either
https://www.outsports.com/2019/3/10/18257930/ncaa-cece-telfer-trans-woman-athlete-track-field

And a lot of trans athletes who compete lose too, and many just give unremarkable performances. They're hardly the unstoppable juggernauts as they're sometimes claimed or believed to be. There's a reasonable article here from a MMA woman's fighter who was previously against Fallon Fox competing here I found interesting
https://www.outsports.com/2021/6/16/22536714/rosi-sexton-mma-trans-athletes-fallon-fox

Its tricky because I think the goalpost isn't as often claimed "we don't want trans athletes to dominate women's sport". Because they've been allowed to compete for a while, 2003 in the Olympics according to IOC guidelines but instead its closer to "we don't any of them winning anything" at all as we're seeing now with Laurel Hubbard potentially getting gold (apparently tricky though since getting a debilitating elbow injury at the 2018 Commonwealth Games) and recently with Veronica Ivy's achievements in cycling.

Yeah, you make some very good points. I’ve generally thought that trans women competing vs cis women is wrong/unfair but it’s easy to forget how tiny this problem really is.

Obviously elite male athletes are far superior to elite female athletes in almost every sport you can imagine but I don’t think many average male athletes would cause the best female athletes many problems.

If you imagine a venn diagram of “men good enough at sports to beat elite female athletes” vs “men who transition” the cross over must be absolutely tiny.

That’s not to say that some biological females won’t lose out to trans women and feel hard done by as a result. But maybe that small number of disaffected athletes is a price worth paying to make trans women feel more accepted in sport at all levels?
 
With chess there simply is not enough female chess players playing.

Yes, there are few ones but when women play against men of the same elo they perform worse, it can be something psychological but the same happens in other type of sports like motorsports or e-sports.