Iron Stove
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2006
- Messages
- 5,748
Thank God for Sport Witness
Interesting this.
Sport Witness@Sport_Witness
Regarding the latest claims about Man United reaching agreement for Gaitan, they are same as Portuguese claims last week.
Apart from the Nani bit, or was that mentioned last week as well?
Apart from the Nani bit, or was that mentioned last week as well?
Gianluca Di MarzioVerified account@DiMarzio
#ManchesterUnited, c’è l’accordo con #Gaitan del #Benfica: la situazione http://gianlucadimarzio.com/campionati-esteri/calcio-internazionale/manchester-united-ce-laccordo-con-gaitan-del-benfica-la-situazione/…
Translation: Manchester United have an agreement with Gaitain
I wasn't.Last year everyone was saying Di Marzio is very reliable and one of the better informed journo's. Now he is saying what a lot of people don't want to hear and all of a sudden he is unreliable and rubbish.
Fully deserves it if true.
Last year everyone was saying Di Marzio is very reliable and one of the better informed journo's. Now he is saying what a lot of people don't want to hear and all of a sudden he is unreliable and rubbish.
Even Gaitan rubbished those rumours Di Marzio.... He should say if he is quoting another source, now it is his reputation taking hit.
Yeah, I never got why he was held in such high esteem. He did - and apparently still does - have 'sources' and information from every major league around, with many never coming to fruition.I wasn't.
Yeah, I remember last summer he said Caulker was going to Everton.Yeah, I never got why he was held in such high esteem. He did - and apparently still does - have 'sources' and information from every major league around, with many never coming to fruition.
Speaking after Benfica’s 2-1 victory over Maritimo in the final game of the Portuguese domestic season, Gaitan said, “I’m used to talks of Man United, I’ve heard about for the last 5 years. No one has talked to me. I’ve a contract here.
“I’m used to talks of Man United, I’ve heard about for the last 5 years. No one has talked to me. I’ve a contract here.
“If it was my last game in a Benfica shirt? Yes, for this season. I haven’t received any offers, neither yesterday or today.”
I wasn't.
Well, this should quite it down a bit, right?
Mirror FootballVerified account@MirrorFootball
Angel Di Maria rubbishes Man United exit talk http://mirr.im/1M8QwZn
Yeah, I remember last summer he said Caulker was going to Everton.
Well, this should quite it down a bit, right?
Mirror FootballVerified account@MirrorFootball
Angel Di Maria rubbishes Man United exit talk http://mirr.im/1M8QwZn
ilmessaggero@ilmessaggeroit
Lazio, in arrivo Van Persie: accordo vicino con il Manchester http://goo.gl/K9K1IK
Translation: Lazio coming Van Persie, close to agreement with Manchester
ilmessaggero@ilmessaggeroit
Lazio, in arrivo Van Persie: accordo vicino con il Manchester http://goo.gl/K9K1IK
Translation: Lazio coming Van Persie, close to agreement with Manchester
Not possible unless you mean in the group stage or something.Signs for Lazio and knocks us out of the CL.
Even though Di Maria is saying he wants to stay, all the noise in the press about him leaving has to be either his agent or mufc.. And i personally think its from his agent.. Seems like he doesnt mind leaving if someone's ready to pay up imo but at the same time keeping a good rapport with fans since the odds are he will stay..
Last year everyone was saying Di Marzio is very reliable and one of the better informed journo's. Now he is saying what a lot of people don't want to hear and all of a sudden he is unreliable and rubbish.
Why does it have to be his agent or mufc? Can't it just be speculation, like most of the articles are? Di Maria has never never said otherwise than that he wants to be here untill he goes back to Argentina. I never believed he wanted out, some poor form doesn't mean that he wants to leave.
There are very few clubs who could even afford him, Bayern Munchen, RM and probably some English clubs. None of them seem realistic. I don't think PSG will pursue him, they already went after cheaper option Memphis and are limitted by FFP. If they pay anything close to what we've paid with the current Euro they couldn't strengthen elsewhere, don't think they'll do that.
Rejoice it just means we are running a tight ship this time around. No one outside those in charge at United knows our intentions but the journalists just can't afford not to write stuff about us.Is it just me or is the media's coverage worse than ever before this summer ?
According to Metro - we have agreed deals for Schneiderlin, Alves and Gundogan. I wouldn't be surprised if none of them are at O.T in 2 months (even if I would love for them to be correct)
Previously - they have linked this and this and this player to various clubs - but this year it's "deal agreed" "deal to be announced" etc...
Is it just me or is the media's coverage worse than ever before this summer ?
According to Metro - we have agreed deals for Schneiderlin, Alves and Gundogan. I wouldn't be surprised if none of them are at O.T in 2 months (even if I would love for them to be correct)
Previously - they have linked this and this and this player to various clubs - but this year it's "deal agreed" "deal to be announced" etc...
They will, once they read your post while scouring the web for 'sources'Sort of shocked that none of these lazy journalists or papers have linked RvP with a return to Arsenal.
elpartidodelas12Verified account@partidodelas12
NOTICIA @partidodelas12: Unai Emery se queda en el Sevilla http://www.cope.es/detalle/Unai-Emery-se-queda-en-el-Sevilla.html…
Translation: Unai Emery stays at Sevilla
The Metro isn't a proper newspaper with on the beat journalists.
It should be a banned source on here, to be honest. It's a free newspaper, and the people that work there rehash the news from other sources, wherever the may be, and put them into their own copy. That's why they are saying we've agreed deals with aforementioned players, using foreign media as the initial source. They're fine to do that, it's the reason the newspaper is free.
They don't have contacts, they don't have the money to ensure they do have contacts and they will never break a story because that isn't the purpose of the newspaper, both logistically and financially.
Basically, blacklist Metro.
They will, once they read your post while scouring the web for 'sources'
The Metro isn't a proper newspaper with on the beat journalists.
It should be a banned source on here, to be honest. It's a free newspaper, and the people that work there rehash the news from other sources, wherever the may be, and put them into their own copy. That's why they are saying we've agreed deals with aforementioned players, using foreign media as the initial source. They're fine to do that, it's the reason the newspaper is free.
They don't have contacts, they don't have the money to ensure they do have contacts and they will never break a story because that isn't the purpose of the newspaper, both logistically and financially.
Basically, blacklist Metro.