Probably wants to just concentrate on his footballThat's nice of him, I'm sure there must be LOADS of offers...
Probably wants to just concentrate on his footballThat's nice of him, I'm sure there must be LOADS of offers...
So you're saying instead of Delap/Cunha we should sign Chris Wood?
Newcastle know that to progress to CL or do well once in CL they need a number of options and can't simply run Isak into the ground. They have Isak and Wilson but Wilson is usually injured every season. Meanwhile, our fans want us to just lump all eggs in the Delap basket.
Newcastle have the right idea, Delap should be one of a couple of striker options at the club and prove himself to be worthy of full time starting. There are enough games to go around and you can't just pick up a player who has had one decent season and just expect him to be your number 1 guy, playing at a much higher level and expectation than he is used to.
I'd guess 95% of our fans don't want that at all, going from everyone's comments on this and the Delap thread. Nearly everyone is of the same opinion, Delap would be fine to bring in to replace Hojlund if we had a more experienced striker as well, we don't, and the only reason people are coming around to the idea is because of the potential addition of Cunha too.Newcastle know that to progress to CL or do well once in CL they need a number of options and can't simply run Isak into the ground. They have Isak and Wilson but Wilson is usually injured every season. Meanwhile, our fans want us to just lump all eggs in the Delap basket.
Newcastle have the right idea, Delap should be one of a couple of striker options at the club and prove himself to be worthy of full time starting. There are enough games to go around and you can't just pick up a player who has had one decent season and just expect him to be your number 1 guy, playing at a much higher level and expectation than he is used to.
Newcastle know that to progress to CL or do well once in CL they need a number of options and can't simply run Isak into the ground. They have Isak and Wilson but Wilson is usually injured every season. Meanwhile, our fans want us to just lump all eggs in the Delap basket.
Newcastle have the right idea, Delap should be one of a couple of striker options at the club and prove himself to be worthy of full time starting. There are enough games to go around and you can't just pick up a player who has had one decent season and just expect him to be your number 1 guy, playing at a much higher level and expectation than he is used to.
Yeah I am definitely in that campI'd guess 95% of our fans don't want that at all, going from everyone's comments on this and the Delap thread. Nearly everyone is of the same opinion, Delap would be fine to bring in to replace Hojlund if we had a more experienced striker as well, we don't, and the only reason people are coming around to the idea is because of the potential addition of Cunha too.
I'd guess 95% of our fans don't want that at all, going from everyone's comments on this and the Delap thread. Nearly everyone is of the same opinion, Delap would be fine to bring in to replace Hojlund if we had a more experienced striker as well, we don't, and the only reason people are coming around to the idea is because of the potential addition of Cunha too.
Also massively unrealistic…Delap plus Watkins would be fantastic if some sort of Rashford deal can be done
I’d prefer Delap plus Mateta, he’s more physical which is what we need two physical fast CFW’s so the two 10’s can play off themDelap plus Watkins would be fantastic if some sort of Rashford deal can be done
Certainly more viableI’d prefer Delap plus Mateta, he’s more physical which is what we need two physical fast CFW’s so the two 10’s can play off them
Joan García has several offers to leave Espanyol in June
Offers from England, Germany and Spain, although at the moment, none are from Real Madrid.
Tier 2:
- Betis want Antony on loan for all of next season as well under the same terms
- Reminder: Betis are covering 84% of Antony's United salary + bonuses
Tier 2:
- Betis want Antony on loan for all of next season as well under the same terms
- Reminder: Betis are covering 84% of Antony's United salary + bonuses
Yea who knows if he is just having a purple patch right now. We must sell him as long as he is playing well.Hopefully we sell the player and get the cash instead of yet another loan.
I’d prefer Delap plus Mateta, he’s more physical which is what we need two physical fast CFW’s so the two 10’s can play off them
Seems more likely we'll loan back to Betis with an obligation to buy at the end. I think at that point it wouldn't negatively impact PSR.Hopefully we sell the player and get the cash instead of yet another loan.
Seems more likely we'll loan back to Betis with an obligation to buy at the end. I think at that point it wouldn't negatively impact PSR.
I think a loan with an (unconditional) obligation to buy at the end counts as a sale in PSR.Seems more likely we'll loan back to Betis with an obligation to buy at the end. I think at that point it wouldn't negatively impact PSR.
Tier 2:
- Betis want Antony on loan for all of next season as well under the same terms
- Reminder: Betis are covering 84% of Antony's United salary + bonuses
It does not. In fact, the only reason to do a loan with an unconditional obligation would be to get around PSR rules.I think a loan with an (unconditional) obligation to buy at the end counts as a sale in PSR.
I'm only happy loaning him back if they cover 100% of his wages, cover in a loan fee his amortisation value for next season with a mandatory clause to sign him next summer, for the remainder of his amortisation value.
Hopefully we sell the player and get the cash instead of yet another loan.
His amortisation charge for next year is about £16m, I'm not sure they'd be willing to pay that much (certainly not much beyond that anyway) to buy him permanently never mind for a loan with an obligation afterwards.I'm only happy loaning him back if they cover 100% of his wages, cover in a loan fee his amortisation value for next season with a mandatory clause to sign him next summer, for the remainder of his amortisation value.
Not if Emery keeps on benching himAlso massively unrealistic…
Could only see it if we sell Hojlund and win EuropaYes likewise. Love the idea of mateta here
Interesting. PWC's guidance on football accounting (link, see section 9) says they should when preparing accounts. But I don't to what degree PSR solely goes from audited accounts.It does not. In fact, the only reason to do a loan with an unconditional obligation would be to get around PSR rules.
If the obligation kicked in on July 1, 2026, then it wouldn't count as a sale for PSR purposes until the first day of the 2026-2027 season.
Or the deal could be that they can have him for a cheaper price, if they pay a compensation fee to cancel Tottenham's first right option for Cardoso, and give him for free. Something like 25m plus Cardoso for Antony.Another loan to Betis has No sense. You should include Antony in a deal with Jesus Rodriguez and Jonny Cardoso.
Can add Garnacho to that list as well unless he leaves this summerI'll get slated for saying this but I think we will come to regret a sale of Højlund. I genuienly don't see Delap as an upgrade. Other than carries and clearances in Delap's and passing in Hojlud's favor there isn't much of a difference. Delap isn't scoring goals for us this year if you had swapped them before the season. There's so little quality in terms of service into the striker here it's pathetic. We need a proper finished article number 9 and there's no reason to spend on another young striker to serve as understudy AND take a loss on Højlund. Delap is also currently overperforming his xg while Højlund is right in line with his xg. Delap this season per 90 npxG plus npxA is .4 and Højlund is .3 (rounded up). Not exactly an upgrade worth depleting limited financial resources.
I'd only loan Antony at the end of the window if we haven't gotten a decent sale over the line.
If we get Cunha then we have Bruno, Cunha, Amad, Mainoo, and then Mount and Zirkzee as options at the number 10s.
So, to me Cunha and a proper striker are key. Then use sales to fund the drastic improvement needed in the centre of midfield.
I get what you are saying about wanting an experienced striker, however outside of Gyokeres the other options are considered too old in the case of Watkins and Mateta.I'll get slated for saying this but I think we will come to regret a sale of Højlund. I genuienly don't see Delap as an upgrade. Other than carries and clearances in Delap's and passing in Hojlud's favor there isn't much of a difference. Delap isn't scoring goals for us this year if you had swapped them before the season. There's so little quality in terms of service into the striker here it's pathetic. We need a proper finished article number 9 and there's no reason to spend on another young striker to serve as understudy AND take a loss on Højlund. Delap is also currently overperforming his xg while Højlund is right in line with his xg. Delap this season per 90 npxG plus npxA is .4 and Højlund is .3 (rounded up). Not exactly an upgrade worth depleting limited financial resources.
I'd only loan Antony at the end of the window if we haven't gotten a decent sale over the line.
If we get Cunha then we have Bruno, Cunha, Amad, Mainoo, and then Mount and Zirkzee as options at the number 10s.
So, to me Cunha and a proper striker are key. Then use sales to fund the drastic improvement needed in the centre of midfield.
Athletico Madrid and Juventus are both interested and they can both pay €40m/£32mHopefully we sell the player and get the cash instead of yet another loan.
Athletico Madrid and Juventus are both interested and they can both pay €40m/£32m
We won't pay the wages that Saudi are offeringMy worry with Delap is he has 12 in 32 in the league at a team where there is pretty much zero scrutiny and very little pressure.
Hojlund scored 10 in 30 in the league hast season with a massive transfer fee over his head and Haaland vs Hojlund nonsense the press was spewing.
I have massive doubts as to whether Delap to be our guy to lead the line for a few years knowing the flack he’ll get if and when he goes a few games without scoring.
I know Amorim isn’t a massive fan of big egos ruining the balance of a dressing room but I don’t think it’s a bad thing in a CF. We need a proven (for more than 1 season) goal scorer and someone who is obsessed with scoring like Evan used to be.
I’d pay whatever it took to sign Omishen, including selling Hojlund if we had to.
If we do sign Delap as only CF signing I think we’ll be kicking ourselves next year.
Tier 2:
- Betis want Antony on loan for all of next season as well under the same terms
- Reminder: Betis are covering 84% of Antony's United salary + bonuses
I like Hojlund, I think he has all the traits to be a good ST, he showed he had potential last season, but this season he has decided to wrestle CBs, instead of running into space which is his best trait.I'll get slated for saying this but I think we will come to regret a sale of Højlund. I genuienly don't see Delap as an upgrade. Other than carries and clearances in Delap's and passing in Hojlud's favor there isn't much of a difference. Delap isn't scoring goals for us this year if you had swapped them before the season. There's so little quality in terms of service into the striker here it's pathetic. We need a proper finished article number 9 and there's no reason to spend on another young striker to serve as understudy AND take a loss on Højlund. Delap is also currently overperforming his xg while Højlund is right in line with his xg. Delap this season per 90 npxG plus npxA is .4 and Højlund is .3 (rounded up). Not exactly an upgrade worth depleting limited financial resources.
I'd only loan Antony at the end of the window if we haven't gotten a decent sale over the line.
If we get Cunha then we have Bruno, Cunha, Amad, Mainoo, and then Mount and Zirkzee as options at the number 10s.
So, to me Cunha and a proper striker are key. Then use sales to fund the drastic improvement needed in the centre of midfield.
Good news, because we need to be busy.
Good news, because we need to be busy.