You want to spend well in today's reality, then forget about Muani, Kane and Hojlund. You start season with Martial and Sancho in attack and a cheap striker on loan. That's the logic, that will lead us to usual results, while opponents pay way more for some players, who aren't even world class just yet, and on top of that they're making additional purchase.
Can't you see, that this whole Hojlund deal is a proof, in your face, that money isn't exactly a problem for United, and all main targets for the summer can be reached ?
You pray if Hojlund works out ? I'm praying Hojlund won't be injured or suspended, because then we have to reach for our striker bench options. Perhaps then I will start praying, because I'll have way better reason, than a huge club like United spending their own money, on things they need.
How do you even make everday shopping, when you know market rules and inflation are caused not by you, but other factors, like pandemic, geopolitical shift, war for territory, war on resources etc. Do you stand in line in your local shop, and tell everybody how daft their thinking is, while buying same products for the same inflated prices ?
Klopp is rebuilding his team twice, in 5 years, and didn't look remotely worried after overkill spending on Darwin. We possibly need a backup striker option, to secure good results, in case of complications, and that's the way of thinking I'm getting behind.
Be worried, I'm not stopping you, bang on your money subject, like it's religion, and when Hojlund will turn 25, his fee to United will probably mean nothing. In 5 years Chelsea will break their own records multiple times, and £88.5m Mudryk could be a grounded in reality sum for player with potential.