Dannn411
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2022
- Messages
- 3,348
If I had to choose only one out of the three to sign, it would be Rice because of the critical need in midfield and the age upside. Kane is clearly the best of the three but we are not in a situation where we are just one striker away. Our base (i.e. our back 6) still needs quite a bit of work to get to the level where we can contend regularly for a long time. Plus spending £100m on a 30 year old is extremely risky. Way riskier than spending £100m on a 24 year old who is already a premier player in his position. For £100m, I would like at least 6-7 years of top level service. I am closer to getting that with a 24 year old vs a 30 year old.Seriously how do we plan to sign Mount, Rice and Kane? No ffp?