And he's gone.
I don't expect us to sign anyone else until the club is sold, I would be genuinely shocked if we do. At best we'll get a stop-gap player on loan (Depay maybe).
And he's gone.
Who is he replacing?
Ten Hag gna be PISSED.
Tier 1:
Translation:
How?We messed it up again
How?
How is it obvious? We need a striker, they guy isn't one.Its obvious ETH wanted him - so when we badly needed a striker after Ronaldo left - why didn't we just agree a deal ?
We messed it up again
Its obvious ETH wanted him - so when we badly needed a striker after Ronaldo left - why didn't we just agree a deal ?
Not sure if serious? Are you one of them who really think we were after a right footed player who play best on the left wing when we are in need of a proper CF. This place kills me at times.
Gakpo would never play over Rashford on the left wing, who happens to be twice the player. Same as second striker over Bruno. So unless he can play CF, it's pointless.Nice arrogant reply there
A young winger who is right-footed and plays on the left - hm...did you ever see Thierry Henry at Monaco or in his early days at Arsenal ? And why are we in need of a proper CF ? We are in need of a goalscorer - and Gakpo is one. City before Haaland arrived, Arsenal, Newcastle and Liverpool have done really well without a "proper" CF - because they have wingers or attacking midfielders who score goals.
Oh and the last time I checked Salah was a left-footed player who plays on the right - and he seems to score a few goals.
Nice arrogant reply there
A young winger who is right-footed and plays on the left - hm...did you ever see Thierry Henry at Monaco or in his early days at Arsenal ? And why are we in need of a proper CF ? We are in need of a goalscorer - and Gakpo is one. City before Haaland arrived, Arsenal, Newcastle and Liverpool have done really well without a "proper" CF - because they have wingers or attacking midfielders who score goals.
Oh and the last time I checked Salah was a left-footed player who plays on the right - and he seems to score a few goals.
I believe I read he had fallen down the pecking order at Ajax this season under the new manager and that he had been asked to be let go. As a mark of respect as he's been a good player for them for a long time, they were inclined to grant it.That seems surprising. Is it?
Could be a good move for him.I believe I read he had fallen down the pecking order at Ajax this season under the new manager and that he had been asked to be let go. As a mark of respect as he's been a good player for them for a long time, they were inclined to grant it.
I had read some murmurings of him going to Bruge too, which I think is where Overmars is now as DOF and another former Ajax coach in charge if I'm not mistaken.
Financial wishes,oh dear
Surely that’s sensible?
Felix or Depay could fit this
We’ll get someone on loan. The Antony signing was clearly influenced by the disastrous start to the season and the immense pressure on the Glazers following it. They never planned that outlay in the summer and we’ll see the knock-on effect in January. The only change is the Ronaldo contract off the books, I’m no accountant but doesn’t that lend itself more to another loan anyway?
Anything they can use to act all emo about United, they will use it
This would explain why:Its obvious ETH wanted him - so when we badly needed a striker after Ronaldo left - why didn't we just agree a deal ?
No, I wouldn't give that decision already now. I think he is on a loan for one season. During the season, when the season is coming to an end, we will take a decision and that depends on a lot of factors. He is playing really well at Nottingham Forest.