Transfer Tweets - 2021/22 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't get the point of this tweet. obviously, if Trippier wants to move to Manchester United then A.Madird will have to look for a replacement.

I suspect it's more they were pretty confident he would stay and actually there may be something in it, seemingly they aren't confident of keeping him so will have to go shopping which they hadn't planned
 
How long have you been watching football mate? People at the heads of their clubs don't go around and randomly telling other clubs what the release clause fees are. Those are probably the best kept secrets in the world. These things only get out to the public if someone has an agenda. I have just told you how that thing is you can believe that or believe your imaginary world where all the heads are sitting and dicussing how to weaken their teams.

Haaland knows what contract he signed and what agreements he made, therefore his agent, Raiola, knows this as well. Therefore everyone who is interested in that information, especially the conditions of a release clause, can get it from Raiola.
 
I don't get the point of this tweet. obviously, if Trippier wants to move to Manchester United then A.Madird will have to look for a replacement.
There's very little point in trying to make sense of tweets. It's full of chancers that want to make a living through peddling bs
 
It is quite crazy how desperate we are for SAncho really. We have one of our most talented youth players in years breaking through at right wing and we have spent £60m odd on a championship player and two teenagers in the last three years.

Were last summer deals desperation or were we expecting more from these players in a debut season in a new culture?If its neither and the plan was to go back in for Sancho, why on earth were we spending so much on two teenagers?

Time will tell if either were good deals and I like us signing talented youngsters, but you have to consider a SAncho deal....where an earth does Pellestri fit in long term?
He’s nowhere near Sancho level right now but as Vickery said last year, he’s a great but raw talent. He’s clearly more direct and has a trick or two up his sleeve. So in that regard he’s more talented than James whos future we’ve yet to decide on. Bringing him back here makes no sense whatsoever. Getting games at a good European club or one of the promoted clubs is a better way to go. The lad has improved steadily and that’s what we can expect from him next season
 
Dortmund aren't going to sell Haaland this summer. They've been firm on that front and Haaland himself said he respected their decision.

And we know that when Dortmund say something, they mean it.
Last summer they sold only €5m worth of talent. They have two summers worth of sales to do in just a few months.
 
Just like every summer newspaper create ridiculous amount of transfer stories but in the end the Big 6 clubs will sign 2-3 players each max and that's it.
 
Is there a reason that we're all conveniently glossing over this? We know that Dortmund don't budge (see last summer with Sancho). What makes people think that Dortmund will budge over Haaland? @Damien made this point before, yet people still think that Dortmund will somehow give in.
It all depends on the money. If Chelsea offer over 120m+ I reckon Dortmund will be very interested.
 
trippier seems like a sensible transfer. also if and when sancho comes, could make watching England more interesting again, like the old days with half the first team potentially reds.
 
It all depends on the money. If Chelsea offer over 120m+ I reckon Dortmund will be very interested.

Think theyll need to go alot higher than that... If they sell both Sancho and Haaland they might miss out on CL, and poof there goes all that profit.
 
Pellestri is not even close to being a reason to not sign Sancho. He was a cheap punt who is very much a "eh lets see what happens". He'll go out on loan again next season, who knows if he'll ever even play for the first team.
The reason not to buy Sancho is the money must be spent on a top class central defender and defensive midfield both of who should start when fit. After emergency holes have been fixed in the roof you can have the luxuries you want.
 
It is quite crazy how desperate we are for SAncho really. We have one of our most talented youth players in years breaking through at right wing and we have spent £60m odd on a championship player and two teenagers in the last three years.

Were last summer deals desperation or were we expecting more from these players in a debut season in a new culture?If its neither and the plan was to go back in for Sancho, why on earth were we spending so much on two teenagers?

Time will tell if either were good deals and I like us signing talented youngsters, but you have to consider a SAncho deal....where an earth does Pellestri fit in long term?
Not 60m, £50m max. Pellestri = 11m, Amad = 20m, James = 18m. Amad's fee will rise after clauses have been triggered when he plays. Why does everyone have to exaggerate so much. Constant exaggeration in football is mind-numbing. The lad gave 200% today.
 
The reason not to buy Sancho is the money must be spent on a top class central defender and defensive midfield both of who should start when fit. After emergency holes have been fixed in the roof you can have the luxuries you want.

we’ve had a creative hole on the RW for near enough a decade.
 
The reason not to buy Sancho is the money must be spent on a top class central defender and defensive midfield both of who should start when fit. After emergency holes have been fixed in the roof you can have the luxuries you want.
FFS since Nani we have not had a RW.
 
I think that settles James to the RCB role, good signing any case if it happens.

Despite playing their a bit in youth games he's only been a CB 4 times in his senior career losing 3 and winning 1. I think it's more a scenario that he'll end up being backup for RB and eventually sold.
 
Despite playing their a bit in youth games he's only been a CB 4 times in his senior career losing 3 and winning 1. I think it's more a scenario that he'll end up being backup for RB and eventually sold.
James wont be at Chelsea in 2 years. I guarentee it.
 
How the hell are Chelsea financing £56m for a full back after last summer's spending and covid?
Their owner is one of the richest men in the world and Chelsea are not in the business to be profitable so they couldn't care less about big expenditure. City and Chelsea will easily outspend everyone else this summer.
 
How long have you been watching football mate? People at the heads of their clubs don't go around and randomly telling other clubs what the release clause fees are. Those are probably the best kept secrets in the world. These things only get out to the public if someone has an agenda. I have just told you how that thing is you can believe that or believe your imaginary world where all the heads are sitting and dicussing how to weaken their teams.



And your point is?





You really have to pay attention.
Yeah, we bought Lukaku, we won the summer of 2017. But then we have the history to look at.
We bought Lukaku for 75 million pounds + 15 million in add-ons. That is 90 million pounds. And then we sold Lukaku for 68 million pounds out of which 50 million is still unpaid and we are haggling with Inter. So our net profit on that deal was cool -22 000 000 pounds.
Chelsea bought Alvaro Morata for 60 million pounds. Then they loaned and they sold him to Atletico for 58 million pounds. net profit - 2 million pounds.
You are totally correct. we totally won that deal.
But why are you looking at just 2 transfers?
Lets take a look at when Marina took over as chief of transfers in 2014. Edward had already been in office for 2 transfer windows. So...
Since 2014 -
Chelsea until last summer had spent -15 million pounds net. But we will add last summer to this also to make numbers look better for our club. So -219 million pounds spent over 7 seasons. And for that money they have won 2 premier leagues, 1 FA cup, 1 Champions League cup, 1 Europa cup and 1 league cup.
WE have spent - 646 million british pounds and for that money we have won 1 FA cup, 1 Europa cup and 1 League cup.
So if someone is arguing about Chelsea vs Man Utd. Just shut up and stay still in the corner. Don't interrupt. And that same argument goes for vs Liverpool, vs Man City.
We are badly run club and we will still be badly run after Glazers replace Edward Woodward with Richard Arnold
My point is you a re a very angry person who needs to calm down before they answer, as you are getting lost in contradictions and double truths.

You compared Chelsea signing Haaland (they havent) and their signing of Havertz as a way of showing how ruthless Chelsea are in the market compared to us.

You seem to miss out on the fact that Chelsea are run completely different to us as a club, with Chelsea it's either win or bust - there isn't any inbetweens. There's no stability and the player turnover is massive.
They are a perrenial cup team, chopping and changing their manager based on whether they are under performing in the league or not. Thats fine if you'd like United to be run that way, but it isn't sustainable.
 
Seems that he wants a very big, very expensive shiny new toy each and every summer & subsequently get rid of the previous very big very expensive shiny new toy that was bought the previous summer.

My point is you a re a very angry person who needs to calm down before they answer, as you are getting lost in contradictions and double truths.

You compared Chelsea signing Haaland (they havent) and their signing of Havertz as a way of showing how ruthless Chelsea are in the market compared to us.

You seem to miss out on the fact that Chelsea are run completely different to us as a club, with Chelsea it's either win or bust - there isn't any inbetweens. There's no stability and the player turnover is massive.
They are a perrenial cup team, chopping and changing their manager based on whether they are under performing in the league or not. Thats fine if you'd like United to be run that way, but it isn't sustainable.

Why don't you just become a Chelsea fan if you love them so much?

BTW Richard Arnold isn't the new CEO. No one is. It hasn't been announced yet.

You always get this upset over things that haven't happened yet?

How long have you been watching football mate? People at the heads of their clubs don't go around and randomly telling other clubs what the release clause fees are. Those are probably the best kept secrets in the world. These things only get out to the public if someone has an agenda. I have just told you how that thing is you can believe that or believe your imaginary world where all the heads are sitting and dicussing how to weaken their teams.



And your point is?





You really have to pay attention.
Yeah, we bought Lukaku, we won the summer of 2017. But then we have the history to look at.
We bought Lukaku for 75 million pounds + 15 million in add-ons. That is 90 million pounds. And then we sold Lukaku for 68 million pounds out of which 50 million is still unpaid and we are haggling with Inter. So our net profit on that deal was cool -22 000 000 pounds.
Chelsea bought Alvaro Morata for 60 million pounds. Then they loaned and they sold him to Atletico for 58 million pounds. net profit - 2 million pounds.
You are totally correct. we totally won that deal.
But why are you looking at just 2 transfers?
Lets take a look at when Marina took over as chief of transfers in 2014. Edward had already been in office for 2 transfer windows. So...
Since 2014 -
Chelsea until last summer had spent -15 million pounds net. But we will add last summer to this also to make numbers look better for our club. So -219 million pounds spent over 7 seasons. And for that money they have won 2 premier leagues, 1 FA cup, 1 Champions League cup, 1 Europa cup and 1 league cup.
WE have spent - 646 million british pounds and for that money we have won 1 FA cup, 1 Europa cup and 1 League cup.
So if someone is arguing about Chelsea vs Man Utd. Just shut up and stay still in the corner. Don't interrupt. And that same argument goes for vs Liverpool, vs Man City.
We are badly run club and we will still be badly run after Glazers replace Edward Woodward with Richard Arnold
 
How the hell are Chelsea financing £56m for a full back after last summer's spending and covid?
Try the £1.3 billion they owe Roman??

People talk about United debt, no one ever discusses the fact that Chelsea have the biggest debt out of every club in the world.
 
Seems that he wants a very big, very expensive shiny new toy each and every summer & subsequently get rid of the previous very big very expensive shiny new toy that was bought the previous summer.



Why don't you just become a Chelsea fan if you love them so much?

BTW Richard Arnold isn't the new CEO. No one is. It hasn't been announced yet.

You always get this upset over things that haven't happened yet?
Yes he does it seems....
 
Despite playing their a bit in youth games he's only been a CB 4 times in his senior career losing 3 and winning 1. I think it's more a scenario that he'll end up being backup for RB and eventually sold.
What a waste of a talent and big slap in the face to Chelsea academy graduates.
 
Despite playing their a bit in youth games he's only been a CB 4 times in his senior career losing 3 and winning 1. I think it's more a scenario that he'll end up being backup for RB and eventually sold.
Yeah, maybe I'm being a bit too optimistic for his Chelsea future.
 
Reece James isn’t going anywhere you jokers. :lol:

It‘s Azpi’s place in the XI that’s under threat if we sign Hakimi, not RJ’s. No more playing the aging Azpi as a wingback when he’s very limited attacking wise and has lost considerable pace. Azpi will become a guy who can fill in at numerous positions as a rotation option.

James RCB, Hakimi RWB.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.