Transfer Tweets - 2021/22 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.
Feck me Mbappe and his team are really milking this. It’s infinitely worse than Fridge’s lower division transfer updates.
 


Source:

When asked about the difference between the two offers from Real and PSG, Mbappe's mum replied:
The 2 offers are similar, there are no big differences, now we await Kylian's choice.

Mrs Faiza Al Amiri continues:
In Real Madrid's offer we have full power of the image rights, on the other side [PSG] there is a financial compensation for this, in short there is no difference between the two they are similar
 


What league do Inter Mailand play in?

Italian league is the worst for players moving to competitive rivals. Just the other day Dybala's absolutely tearing it at his last home game for Juve. Now he's moving to a league challenger.
 


Source: Calciomercato

He still has one year on his contract with the Blues, the priority is renewal. At the moment, however, Chelsea cannot operate on the market for issues arising from the Abramovich sale, so we will meet with the club to discuss it.

The Juventus officials didn’t call me, surely because they know that at Chelsea at the moment nothing can be done without a license for the transfer market. Obviously, a profile like Jorge’s would serve many teams, even in Italy. I repeat, we will see the Chelsea situation first, because his priority is the renewal with the Londoners. In any case, I repeat, to date no one has come from Italy to ask me.
 

Can somebody fill me in on this?

All I could find on CVC and Barca was a two-month old article claiming they were close to receiving additional revenue from a TV deal spanning La Liga with the private equity firm CVC Capital Partners. It would seem odd to me that Barca would only just have become aware of this being an option for them unless I'm missing a crucial recent update to the story?
 
Last edited:
Atletico Madrid president Enrique Cerezo on Griezmann:


Reminder: Griezmann's currently on loan to Atletico Madrid from Barcelona. Atletico does have a purchase option, however.

EDIT: Replaced Spanish Tweet with an English one


If Griezzman plays more than 50% of the matches in which he is available Atletico has a mandatory purchase of €40m.
Last year he already surpassed it.
 
Yesterday, RMC Sport reported that William Saliba told Marseille about wanting to stay.

Info RMC Sport : Saliba told OM that he wanted to stay

Jorge Sampaoli also wants Saliba to stick around and has this as one of Marseille's biggest priorities this summer. However, despite how happy William Saliba is at Marseille, that doesn't necessarily mean that Arsenal would be willing to loan him back out to Marseille.

The permanence of William Saliba at Marseille is far from certain. We will see in the coming days how it ends.
 
Yesterday, RMC Sport reported that William Saliba told Marseille about wanting to stay.



Jorge Sampaoli also wants Saliba to stick around and has this as one of Marseille's biggest priorities this summer. However, despite how happy William Saliba is at Marseille, that doesn't necessarily mean that Arsenal would be willing to loan him back out to Marseille.


should do a swap deal of Martial and him from Arsenal
 
We priced Dalot at €20m last summer and there was no interest.
That's not true according to multiple sources. We had journalists last summer saying once it was confirmed Trippier wasn't coming we told Dalot's suitors that he wasn't leaving.
 
Isco was supposed to be the next big thing, I guess it didn't work out?
He had a solid career at Real Madrid and contributed to their Champions League wins in the past several years, but he wasn't necessarily an undisputed starter for them throughout his tenure. He didn't necessarily flop, but he didn't also deliver on the massive promise from his Malaga days.
 
Can somebody fill me in on this?

All I could find on CVC and Barca was a two-month old article claiming they were close to receiving additional revenue from a TV deal spanning La Liga with the private equity firm CVC Capital Partners. It would seem odd to me that Barca would only just have become aware of this being an option for them unless I'm missing a crucial recent update to the story?

RM, Barca and Atleti are all opposed to the CVC deal AFAIK because the deal gives TV rights to CVC for the next 50 years whereas currently the big teams in La Liga can negotiate their own more lucrative individual deals. That was my understanding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.