Whoever he would start and play for.There's only one choice there really.
Whoever he would start and play for.There's only one choice there really.
Whoever he would start and play for.
I was thinking about the second-best club in Germany with a track record of developing youngsters as opposed to a basket case like Derby.
If he's as good as we hope he is, Amad should get game time at BVB. If fit, Haaland and Reus are the only guaranteed starters in their attack which leaves either 1 or 2 spaces depending on their set up. He should at least be in contention to get game time there, though Dortmund may want some kind of incentive for short loan, possibly an option to buy or an option to extend the loan to next season.
Derby under Rooney would be a good loan. Mengi had a very good spell there until he got injured. They’d be doing very well without the points deduction and actually play good football.I was thinking about the second-best club in Germany with a track record of developing youngsters as opposed to a basket case like Derby.
Would he play?I was thinking about the second-best club in Germany with a track record of developing youngsters as opposed to a basket case like Derby.
What a massively underwhelming signing. The richest club in the World and they are signing Championship level managers & players.
Derby under Rooney would be a good loan. Mengi had a very good spell there until he got injured. They’d be doing very well without the points deduction and actually play good football.
Would he play?
If BVB bought Amad outright, then yes, they would give him game time to develop, but, as loan, not so sure, afterall, they have Haaland, Reus, Reyna, T.Hazard, Brandt, & Melen as their forwards (strikers/wingers), and he would not get ahead of any of them.
do they have some sort of injury crisis to be looking for a player like Amad on loan?
They have to start somewhere. They're in a relegation battle so they won't be signing top players for a few years yet.
If he's as good as we hope he is, Amad should get game time at BVB. If fit, Haaland and Reus are the only guaranteed starters in their attack which leaves either 1 or 2 spaces depending on their set up. He should at least be in contention to get game time there, though Dortmund may want some kind of incentive for short loan, possibly an option to buy or an option to extend the loan to next season.
They won't be getting out of the relegation zone with the manager they have and the players they have brought. I guess they aren't into throwing money at the problem, like City did when they won the lottery.
Loan??? No issue with either of those but Dortmund is the higher risk, higher reward. Be good for himThere's only one choice there really.
He almost never plays though.We have zero depth in midfield as it is, makes no sense
We have zero depth in midfield as it is, makes no sense
If we’re getting a player better suited to positions in need, then making space by moving on a surplus player, then it’s very logical.We have zero depth in midfield as it is, makes no sense
Wasn't this the whole point of appointing a Football Director (Murtough), to ensure that the club continues to operate as normal throughout regime changes? Players like Pogba and Lingard will be out of contract before a new manager comes on board, so we have to decide whether to sell, let the contract run down or try to extend. VDB seemingly wants out so that decision needs to be made by the club.We won’t sign any player this season. I can’t see any player coming in know he may not be fancied by our new manager in the summer. Why would United go and spend 30m on a player when we’d expect the squad to be re assessed once the new manager has had time to identify what he needs. It’s another cycle but hopefully we get it right next time round
Yes Derby all day long….There's only one choice there really.
Goal.com Charles WattsTielemans was linked with Arsenal the other day, did anyone catch who the outlet and reporter behind it was?
Tielemans was linked with Arsenal the other day, did anyone catch who the outlet and reporter behind it was?
Last season he played a lot, this season he's been slapped on the bench by their new manager Seoane. I guess Amiri wants first team football and has peaced out, but going to Genoa who are currently in 19th in Serie A is a big step down.
Yeah, I guess the lack of football would be a drawback, though I was expecting him to get more minutes given how he's more reliable. I'm kind of surprised that Bellarabi and Adli are getting more minutes given their issues, but he is more limited than them.He's more like second or third fiddle, currently. Wirtz, Demirbay, Diaby, Adli, Paulinho and Bellarabi all seem to be ahead of him in the hierarchy. He had a brief period under Bosz when he really excelled but that soon vanished again. Not really unexpected if you ask me, Amiri was always more of a "he's cheap, you can't do anything wrong signing him" but he was always the most limited talentwise. Wish him all the best though, I like the guy
I hope so. I had this theory that one of the reasons we are keeping him is because ETH is in line to be the next manager.I imagine this means offered by his agent, not the club.
Yeah, Limited is the wrong word in comparison to Bellarabi, specifically, but I guess Bellarabi's more direct and a better fit for the wide areas.I certainly wouldn't call him more limited than Bellarabi, who is very limited, but has a different profile. Bellarabi is a specialist wide dribbler, Amiri is more of a 8-ish/10-ish midfielder, no? So he's got Wirtz ahead of him.