Looks like a sale is imminent here.
As I said, I wouldn't bet on us, but I'm not going to throw in the towel just yet
It's also still too early for me to identify a clear favourite with all the clubs after him. a lot will depend on what happens at those clubs over the season.
The thing that, for me, I wonder about his supposed urge to join United- why didn't he then?
Fair enough.Pretty sure we wouldn't agree to the release clause and the structure of the deal Raiola wanted.
Fair enough.
I just wonder why anyone would think it's more practicable to not sign a player, who wants to come as you claim, with a release clause for a small transfer fee and then convince him to extend his stay at the club for real and without such a clause, but instead you let him go somewhere else to then convince him to join again two years later, for a huge contract and a much higher transfer fee, facing huge competition.
Something does not add up with that story..
his arms are too hairy to be a success in the pl.
Because you're not a stepping stone club?United don't include release clause for any player. It would have caused issue with future contract negotiations and players that United buy. Hence United passed on the opportunity to sign him.
Could be that Milan are just bluffing and hoping we relent in our negotiation stance.
Supposedly we want €5m in loan fee and an option/obligation for €15m. That seems pretty fair to me. If they want him so bad, pay up!
I think that is obvious.Because you're not a stepping stone club?
Fair enough.
I just wonder why anyone would think it's more practicable to not sign a player, who wants to come as you claim, with a release clause for a small transfer fee and then convince him to extend his stay at the club for real and without such a clause, but instead you let him go somewhere else to then convince him to join again two years later, for a huge contract and a much higher transfer fee, facing huge competition.
Something does not add up with that story..
I am not going to advocate for him, but he didn't look lost in his full game against Belgium, his performances in Milan have been alright and I think 5m euros is a fair asking price, considering he's our stronger RB back up.Really? I’m not seeing any progress from him as yet? Which is why our asking price is too much
Amine Adli is a 21-year-old attacking player who can out wide or behind the striker.
EDIT: English Tweet
5m loan followed by another 15m for buying. That puts his price at 20m. More than we paid for him. We can’t possibly justify thatI am not going to advocate for him, but he didn't look lost in his full game against Belgium, his performances in Milan have been alright and I think 5m euros is a fair asking price, considering he's our stronger RB back up.
So if Haaland shared that perception and considers Man Utd as a preferred permanent destination, why would he insist on a release clause in the first place, why wouldn't it be possible to negotiate a contract without it?I think that is obvious.
Surely not as big a payoff to dad and Raiola as we all are facing next year so that argument makes little sense.Essentially the deal couldn't be done with what Raiola wanted. I'm sure there was a very big pay off to the agent and his dad too in addition to the release clause.
Dortmund were pretty much agreeable to it all whilst United weren't.
Unless you believe only United and Dortmund were interested and it was simply the players choice to go to Dortmund and play in Germany? I think a few teams were put off with the proposed deal that Dortmund accepted.
That's what I was thinking, but he's like Musiala in that he can play in all attacking positions, not just out wide. That'd make him more than a 4th-choice winger, no?The „4th option“ is meant to be that he would be their 4th winger behind Coman, Gnabr and Sané.
Haaland at that time wasn't the sure thing he's now, though.Surely not as big a payoff to dad and Haaland as we all are facing next year so that argument makes little sense.
Still no agreement tonight between PSG and Lionel Messi. The Argentinian will therefore not come to the capital in the evening.
Yeah but Utd were trying to sign him weren't you. And the transfer sum was a joke, what was it 20m €?Haaland at that time wasn't the sure thing he's now back then, though.
So if Haaland shared that perception and considers Man Utd as a preferred permanent destination, why would he insist on a release clause in the first place, why wouldn't it be possible to negotiate a contract without it?
As I said, something doesn't add up.
Unless you assume the attractiveness to Haaland as a destination of Man United 2022 has fundamentally changed from Man United 2020. It's possible, but for that you need to have a head-turning season, in my view.
Yes they were, but it's easy to understand United being willing to agree to Raiolas demands now that he's a superstar compared to Raiolas demands when he came from the Austrian league.Yeah but Utd were trying to sign him weren't you.
I repeat myself, something doesn't add up. I laid out my reasoning above. Apart from that, I have no clue, and of course it's very possible he joins you next summer.
Surely not as big a payoff to dad and Raiola as we all are facing next year so that argument makes little sense.
It's not like he was a nobody....Yes they were, but it's easy to understand United being willing to agree to Raiolas demands now that he's a superstar compared to Raiolas demands when he came from the Austrian league.
Yeah but Utd were trying to sign him weren't you. And the transfer sum was a joke, what was it 20m €?
I repeat myself, something doesn't add up. I laid out my reasoning above. Apart from that, I have no clue, and of course it's very possible he joins you next summer.
Yeah I get that. As it should be.It's not really an argument. It's what was reported. No one knows exactly but as mentioned earlier United have a history of not doing release clauses (don't think any of the big English clubs do) and this was a major sticking point.
Atlético will sign one forward. Not two. One and that's it. Rafa Mir, tied up, but not fully closed yet. Surely the most likely as of today. Dusan Vlahovic is another option but not easy. There are some more. The club keeps working.
Not really adressing any of my points, but ok.Most players want to win titles. The PL, unlike the Bundesliga, is a competitive league where any team can fall of the top. Man Utd from 2013-2021 is a great example of that. That obviously make teams like Man Utd and Liverpool less attractive than Real Madrid and Bayern for some players. But what a joke it is how these teams have ruined competition in La Liga and Bundesliga (Bayern obviously way worse than Real Madrid).
But that do not make Man Utd a stepping stone-club. Man Utd can also attract the biggest name in football despite not being at it best. I mean, players like Pogba in 2016 and Sancho in 2021 would probably not even consider Bayern despite them being a guarantee for a league title.
Yeah but Utd were trying to sign him weren't you. And the transfer sum was a joke, what was it 20m €?
I repeat myself, something doesn't add up. I laid out my reasoning above. Apart from that, I have no clue, and of course it's very possible he joins you next summer.
Nat Phillips wants more first-team football. With Van Dijk, Konaté, Matip, and Gomez all fit now, Phillips has no way to get enough first-team football.I thought Phillips was the better of their young CBs? That other one who they kept having to play was hopeless.
I thought Phillips was the better of their young CBs? That other one who they kept having to play was hopeless.
Right. That's a good argument if you believe he was afraid of the competition back then.The big change is we weren’t prepared to guarantee Haaland the starting position when he moved to Dortmund. Now he’d be coming in as the new no9 guaranteed starter.
At 24 he’s not really a youngster anymore. They have four established senior CBs in VVD, Gomez, Konate and Matip so he’s surplus to requirements.
Not really adressing any of my points, but ok.
You didn't. You responded like I was trying to big up Bayern as favourites to sign him, which I didn't and don't, as you can clearly read at the start of the discussion.Yes I did, just not the way you wanted it to be. But ok.
I have to meet the president of Rubin after August 12. With 85-90% probability, Kvaratskhelia will change teams and play in a very high level club in Europe. There is a lot of interest – from England, Italy or Germany. Everything will be clear by the end of August.
I do not understand where the information is spread by people who have no relationship with the player, the club or the agent. I say with full responsibility that there was no interest from Milan and we did not contact the former captain of the Georgian national team about this issue. There was interest from a Milan club, but it was Inter whose leadership we met in April. As for Tottenham, I will confirm the information in this case, there’s a serious interest from them. I cannot say anything new about Leeds and Khvicha.
Khvicha is wanted by almost every team in the English Premier League, for example, Everton, Brighton and Wolves, but one thing is interest and the other is a real offer. Apart from Inter from Italy, Kvaratskhelia is also wanted by Juventus. There’s the interest of Atalanta, Napoli and Lazio. The initiative is shown by at least five clubs of the German Bundesliga. At this stage, active negotiations are underway with only two clubs, one of which is in England and the other in Italy. They know all the details related to the player transfer.
You didn't. You responded like I was trying to big up Bayern as favourites to sign him, which I didn't and don't, as you can clearly read at the start of the discussion.