I think Grealish has already signed on the dotted line pal. Kane on the other hand has a meet and greet with Santo.
He's already signed for city (Grealish)
Eh? James isn't crucial to any aspect of winning, he's bang average. Pellistri, Amad and Hannibal could get his minutes in the easier games.
Meh rather have Sancho.
What a weird video...
His good defensive work is overrated. He's doing a lot of chasing, but not giving the ball away more than he wins it back. Lingard can offer similar quality while being less wasteful with possession. Lingard is not crucial in nothing for us. So is JamesHe is crucial though, if you need a player to do a good defensive job and keep the shape, with the ability to break forward with directness and pace, he is the best we've got. At least until Marcus gets back.
I guess but how often does a club come out and state exactly how much the fee was etc. Seems weird.Given how so many Villa fans are angry about Grealish leaving Villa, I can see why Purslow made this announcement.
Currently British record fee for someone who has been open to move for few seasons now, in COVID time. Not like the club forcing him out against his desire. Their fans are overreacting.I guess but how often does a club come out and state exactly how much the fee was etc. Seems weird.
I guess but how often does a club come out and state exactly how much the fee was etc. Seems weird.
Anger for what? Villa fans should learn their place with all due respect. If a big club came in he was always going to go...Attempt to move their fans anger from Villa to City
What a weird video...
I get what you mean, but Purslow did state that there was a release clause, so disclosing the amount doesn't seem that weird, IMO.I guess but how often does a club come out and state exactly how much the fee was etc. Seems weird.
What a weird video...
Makes no difference if he stated the fee or not. Could quite easily have said there was a release clause that was met...I get what you mean, but Purslow did state that there was a release clause, so disclosing the amount doesn't seem that weird, IMO.
ExactlyWhy does he specify their transfer strategy and the fee? Surely the selling clubs will try to rinse them now that they understand Villa have 100m in the bank?
I guess but how often does a club come out and state exactly how much the fee was etc. Seems weird.
They already signed his replacements.Why does he specify their transfer strategy and the fee? Surely the selling clubs will try to rinse them now that they understand Villa have 100m in the bank?
Why does he specify their transfer strategy and the fee? Surely the selling clubs will try to rinse them now that they understand Villa have 100m in the bank?
Neither can Villa. Good luck negotiating with teams that know they have just received £100 Million ( up front too I guess with a release clause...)Good, City's PR team can’t downplay the fee.
You're right, it's not common, but here we are. Add this to one of those rare instances.Makes no difference if he stated the fee or not. Could quite easily have said there was a release clause that was met...
How often do clubs publicly come out and confirm transfer fees?
This already started with Ings. It's only going to get worse for them.Why does he specify their transfer strategy and the fee? Surely the selling clubs will try to rinse them now that they understand Villa have 100m in the bank?
No they weren'tIn his thread they were tracking a plane to liverpool
Why does he specify their transfer strategy and the fee? Surely the selling clubs will try to rinse them now that they understand Villa have 100m in the bank?
Why does he specify their transfer strategy and the fee? Surely the selling clubs will try to rinse them now that they understand Villa have 100m in the bank?
Why does he specify their transfer strategy and the fee? Surely the selling clubs will try to rinse them now that they understand Villa have 100m in the bank?
Neither can Villa. Good luck negotiating with teams that know they have just received £100 Million ( up front too I guess with a release clause...)
Seems incredibly stupid and counterproductive unless they are finished for the summer.
And if they try and sign anybody else?they already signed 3 good players for 90 mil or less, so they won't be rinsed, even though I think Ings is a tad bit expensive, the other 2 cost reasonable fees.
Attacking players yeah. What if they try and buy somebody else. Seems a bit stupid.They have already signed the 3 attacking players they want.
They want to ensure the fans that the club was handsomely compensated. There's more to PR than transfer strategy. You often see the selling club disclose the fee (provided it was high) in order to appease their stakeholders. United did with Ronaldo back in the day too.Makes no difference if he stated the fee or not. Could quite easily have said there was a release clause that was met...
How often do clubs publicly come out and confirm transfer fees?
I guess but how often does a club come out and state exactly how much the fee was etc. Seems weird.
Chelsea want 40 million Pounds for Tammy Abraham. If Villa are really keen, then yeah, they have no chance of negotiating that down.Attacking players yeah. What if they try and buy somebody else. Seems a bit stupid.